This study examines the coping mechanisms used by public welfare supervisors to deal with organizational stress. The findings, based on a qualitative study, indicate that the 14 supervisors examined employed two different coping categories which differ with regard to (a) their focus, (b) the source of stress, (c) the target person who is meant to benefit from them, and (d) the specific coping mechanisms. The first category is basically problem-focused, and serves the purpose of buffering subordinates from policy-ambiguity. The second category is essentially emotion-focused, and aims at buffering supervisors from stressful expectations of management and peers.
ASHFORD, S. J.Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 1988, 24(1), 19-36.
2.
BANTZ, C. R.Ethnographic analysis of organizational cultures. In S. L. Herndon and G. L. Kreps (Eds.), Qualitative research: Applications in organizational communication. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 1993, pp. 107-119.
3.
BRYMAN, A., BRESNEN, M., BEARDSWOTH, A., & KEIL, T.Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Human Relations, 1988, 41(1), 13-30.
4.
BURKE, R. J., & WEIR, T.Coping with the stress of managerial occupations. In C. L. Cooper and R. Payne (Eds.), Current concerns in occupational stress. New York: Wiley, 1980.
5.
DEWE, P. J.Examining the nature of work stress: Individual evaluations of stressful experiences and coping. Human Relations, 1989, 42(11), 993-1013.
6.
DEWE, P. J., & GUEST, D. E.Methods of coping with stress at work A conceptual analysis and empirical study of measurement issues. Journal of QOaizatal Behavior, 1990, 11, 135-150.
7.
ERERA, I. P.Social support under conditions of organizational ambiguity. Human Relations, 1992, 45(3), 247-264.
8.
JACKSON, S. E., & SCHULER, R. S.A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work situations. Organizational Behavior and Human Perfornance, 1985, 36, 16-78.
9.
KAHN, R., WOLFE, D., QUINN, R., SNOEK, D., & ROSENTHAL, R. A.Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley, 1964.
10.
KENNY, G. H., BUTLER, R. J., HICKSON, D. J., CRAY, D., MALLORY, G. R., & WILSON, D. C.Strategic decision making: Influence patterns in public and private sector organizations. Human Relations, 1987, 40(9), 613-632.
11.
LAZARUS, R. S., & FOLKMAN, S.Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer1984.
12.
LAZARUS, R. S., & LAUNIER, R.Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L. A. Pervin and M. Lewis (Eds.), Perspectives in interactional psychology. New York: Plenum, 1978, pp. 189-217.
13.
MILES, R. H.Role requirements as sources of organizational stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 172-179.
14.
MOOS, R. H., & BILLINGS, A. G.Conceptualizing and measuring coping resourcesand processes. In L. Goldberg and S. Breznitz (Eds.), The handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New York: Free Press, 1982.
15.
NELSON, D. L., & SUTION, C.Chronic work stress and coping: A longitudinal study and suggested new directions. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33(4), 859-869.
16.
NEWMAN, J. E., & BEEHR, T. A.Personal and organizational strategies for handling job stress: A review of research and opinion. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 1979, 32, 1-43.
17.
OSIPOW, S. H., & DAVIS, A. D.The relationship of coping resources to occupational stress and strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1988, 32, 1-15.
18.
OSIPOW, S. H., DOTY, R. E., & SPOKANE, A. R.Occupational stress and strain, and coping across the life span. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1985, 27, 98-108.
19.
PARASURMAN, S., & CLEEK, M. A.Coping behaviors and managers affective reactions to role stressors. Journal and Vocational Behavior, 1984, 24, 179-193.
20.
SCHNEER, J. A., & CHANIN, M. N.Manifest needs as personality predispositions to conflict-handling behavior. Human Relations, 1987, 40(9), 575-590.
21.
SMITH-RING, P., & PERRY, J. LStrategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(2), 276-286.
22.
STRAUSS, A. L.Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
23.
STRAUSS, A., & CORBIN, J.Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
24.
WHETTEN, D.Coping with incompatible expectations: An integrated view of role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 197823, 254-269.
