Empirical work to date on the Freudian concept of projection is assessed. Previous reviews are considered and recent work integrated as well as material from several disciplines. This is an area with a substantial but convoluted research literature from which elements are distilled which seem essential for progress in the clarification of Projection, particularly with reference to its defensive qualities and its targeting. Of the many forms of projection that have been included in previous literature, two, Classical and Attributive (Holmes, 1868), are isolated as relevant to this paper. A “checklist” of pertinent factors for future designs is drawn up which integrates the strongest strands from work done under the rubric Social Psychology. It is concluded that despite the tenacity of the projection concept, work so far has provided a series of methodological caveats and much suggestive, but little conclusive data.
ADORNO, T. W. , FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK, E. , LEVINSON, D. J. , & SANFORD, R. N.The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper , 1950.
2.
ANDREWS, G. , POLLOCK, C. , & STEWART, G.The determination of defense style by questionnaire . Archives of General Psychiatry, 1989, 46, 455-460 .
3.
ASCH, S. E.Forming impressions of personality . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1946, 41, 258-290 .
4.
BENNETT, D. H. , & HOLMES, D. S.Influence of denial (situational redefinition) and projection on anxiety associated with threat to self esteem . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 915-921 .
5.
BION, W.Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock , 1961.
6.
BLACHA, M. S. , & FANCHER, R. E.A content validity study of the Defense Mechanism Inventory . Journal of Personality Assessment, 1977, 41, 402-404 .
7.
BOND, M. , GARDNER, S. T. , CHRISTIAN, J. , & SIEGEL, J. J.Empirical study of self-rated defense styles . Archives of General Psychiatry, 1983, 40, 333-338 .
8.
BRAMEL, D.A dissonance theory approach to defensive projection . Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 121-129 .
9.
BRAMEL, D.Selection of a target for defensive projection . Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 318-324 .
10.
BREMS, C.Defense mechanisms in clients and non-clients as mediated by gender and sex role . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1960, 46(5), 669-675 .
11.
BURISH, T. G. , & HOUSTON, B. K.Causal projection, similarity projection, and coping with threat to self-esteem . Journal of Personality, 1979, 47, 57-70 .
12.
CACIOPPO, J. T. , BERNTSON, G. G. , & ANDERSEN, B. L.Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome, 1991: Contributions from social psychophysiology . Psychological Assessment, 1991, 3(3), 321-336 .
13.
CALVIN, A. , HANLEY, C. , HOFFMAN, F. , & CLIFFORD, L.An experimental investigation of the “pull” effect . Journal of Social Psychology, 1959, 49, 275-283 .
CRAMER, P.The development of defense mechanisms . Journal of Personality, 1987, 55, 597-614 .
16.
CRUICKSHANK, P. J.A stress and arousal mood scale for low vocabulary: A reworking of Mackay et al. (1978) . British Journal of Psychology, 1984, 75, 89-94 .
17.
DAHLSTROM, W. G. , & WELSH, G. S.An M.M.P.I. handbook: A guide to use in clinical practice and research. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press , 1960.
18.
DOLLINGER, S. J. , & CRAMER, P.Children's defensive responses and emotional upset following a disaster: A projective assessment . Journal of Personality Assessment. 1987, 54(1-2), 116-127 .
19.
DUCAT, S.Science and psychoanalysis: The implications of recent findings in psychopathology research and neurophysiology for the Freudian theory of the mind . International Journal of Biosocial Research, 1985, 7(2), 94-107 .
20.
EDLOW, D. , & KIESLER, C.Ease of denial and defensive projection . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966, 2, 56-69 .
21.
ENDRESEN, I. M.A Norwegian translation of the Plutchik questionnaire for psychological defense . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1991, 32, 105-113 .
22.
EPSTEIN, R. , & BARON, R. M.Cognitive dissonance and projected hostility towards outgroups . Journal of Social Psychology, 1969, 79, 171-182 .
23.
ERDELYI, M. H.Psychoanalysis: Freud's cognitive psychology. New York: Freeman , 1985.
24.
FESHBACH, S. , & FESHBACH, N.1963. Influence of the stimulus object upon the complementary and supplementary projection of fear . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 498-502 .
25.
FREUD, S.Extracts from the Fliess papers. In The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 1). London: Hogarth , 1966 (originally published in 1895).
26.
FREUD, S.Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia. In The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. (Vol. 12). London: Hogarth , 1958 (originally published in 1911).
27.
FREUD, S.Totem and taboo. In The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13). London: Hogarth , 1955 (originally published in 1913).
28.
FREUD, S.The unconscious. In The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14). London: Hogarth , 1957 (originally published in 1915).
29.
FREUD, S.Some neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia, and homosexuality. In The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18). London: Hogarth , 1955 (originally published in 1922).
30.
GLESSER, G. C. , & IHILEVICH, D.An objective instrument for measuring defense mechanisms . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33(1), 51-60 .
31.
HAFNER, R. J.Marital systems of agoraphobic women: Contributions of husbands' denial and projection . Journal of Family Therapy, 1983, 5(4), 379-396 .
32.
HALPERNS, J.Projection: A test of the psychoanalytic hypothesis . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1977, 86, 536-542 .
33.
HALPERN, J. , & GOLDSCHMITT, M.Attributive projection: Test of defensive hypotheses . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 42, 707-711 .
34.
HAYES, S. P., Jr.The predictive ability of voters . Journal of Social Psychology, 1936, 7, 183-191 .
35.
HEILBRUN, A. B.Style of adaptation to perceived aversive maternal stimulation and selective attention to evaluative cues . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 77, 340-344 .
36.
HEILBRUN, A. B.Style of adaptation to perceived aversive maternal control and internal scanning behavior . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972(a), 39, 15-21 .
37.
HEILBRUN, A. B.Tolerance for ambiguity in late-adolescent males: Implications for a developmental model of paranoid behavior . Developmental Psychology, 1972(b), 7, 288-294 .
38.
HEILBRUN, A. B.Adaptation to aversive maternal control and perception of simultaneously presented evaluative clues: Further test of a developmental model of paranoid behavior . Journal of Consuling and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 41, 301-307 .
39.
HEILBRUN, A. B.The influence of defensive styles upon the predictive validity of the Thematic Apperception Test . Journal of Personality Assessment, 1977, 41, 486-491 .
40.
HEILBRUN, A. B.Projective and repressive styles of processing aversive information . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46(1), 156-164 .
41.
HEILBRUN, A. B. , & CASSIDY, J. C.Toward an explanation of defensive projection in normals: The role of social cognition . Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1985, 3(2), 190-200 .
42.
HEILBRUN, A. B. , & NORBERT, N.1972 style of adaptation to aversive maternal control and paranoid behavior . Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1972, 120, 145-153 .
43.
HEILBRUN, A. B. , & PEPE, V.Awareness of cognitive defenses and stress management . British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1985, 58, 9-17 .
44.
HEILBRUN, A. B. , BLUM, N. , & GOLDREYER, N.Defensive projection: An investigation of its role in paranoid delusions . Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1984, 173(1), 17-25 .
45.
HELLMAN, R. , & HOUSTON, B. K.A study of the stress-reducing effect of attributive projection. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Austin , 1970.
46.
HOLMES, D. S.Dimensions of projection . Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69(4), 248-268 .
47.
HOLMES, D. S.Compensation for ego threat: Two experiments . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 234-237 .
48.
HOLMES, D. S.Attribution (projection) of one's undesirable traits: Self-defense or person-perception? Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas , 1976.
49.
HOLMES, D. S.Projection as a defense mechanism . Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, 677-688 .
50.
HOLMES, D. S.Existence of classical projection and the stress-reducing function of attributive projection: A reply to Sherwood . Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90(3), 460-466 .
51.
HOLMES, D. S. , & HOUSTON, K. B.The defensive function of projection . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 208-213 .
52.
HOLT, R. R.The accuracy of self-evaluations: Its measurement and some of its personological correlates . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1951, 15, 95-101 .
53.
JOHNSON, J. H. , & SARASON, I. G.Recent developments in research on life stress. In V. Hamilton and D. M. Warburton (Eds.), Human stress and cognition: An information processing approach. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1979, pp. 205-233.
54.
JUNI, S.Classical projection: A critique of experimental methodologies . Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1980, 101, 119-146 .
55.
JUNI, S.The composite measure of the Defense Mechanism Inventory . Journal of Research in Personality, 1982, 16, 193-200 .
KIESLER, C. A. , & SINGER, R. D.The effects of similarity and guilt on the projection of hostility . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1963, 19, 156-162 .
58.
KLINE, P.Fact and fantasy in Freudian theory (2nd ed.). London: Methuen , 1981 (originally published in 1972).
59.
KRAGH, U.Studying effects of psychotherapy by the Defense Mechanism Test-Two case illustrations . Archiv fur Psychologie, 1983, 135(1), 73-82 .
LACEY, J. I.Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In E. A. Rubinstein and M. B. Parloff (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy (Vol. 1). Washington: American Psychological Association , 1959, pp. 160-208.
62.
LAZARUS, R. S.A cognitively oriented psychologist looks at biofeedback . American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 553-561 .
63.
LEMANN, G. F. J.Group characteristics as revealed in sociometric patterns and personality ratings . Sociometry, 1952, 15, 7-90 .
64.
MACKAY, C. , COX, T. , BURROWS, G. , & LAZZERINI, T.An inventory for the measurement of self-reported stress and arousal . British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 17, 283-284 .
65.
MAMALAKIS, G. M. , NEVELS, R. M. , BLAIR, G. E. , & WEBSTER, E. G.Interpersonal attraction and defensive style . Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 128(2), 275-277 .
66.
MARKOWITZ, A. , & FORD, L. H.Defensive denial and selection of a target for projection . Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1967, Z272-277 .
67.
McGILVRAY, D. B.The 1987 Stirling Award essay: Sex, repression, and sanskritization in Sri Lanka?Ethos, 1988, 16(2), 99-127 .
68.
MINER, M. M.Horatio Alger's Ragged Dick: Projection, denial and double-dealing . American Imago, 1990, 47(3-4), 233-248 .
69.
MINTZ, E.An example of assimilative projection . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 5Z270-280 .
70.
MULLEN, B.The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1985, 21(3), 262-283 .
71.
MULLEN, B. , & HU, L.Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 27(4), 333-356 .
72.
MURRAY, H. A. In H. H. Anderson and G. L. Anderson (Eds.) An introduction to projective techniques. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall , 1951.
73.
MURSTEIN, B. I.The projection of hostility on the Rorschach and as a result of ego-threat . Journal of Projective Techniques, 1956, 20, 418-428 .
74.
MURSTEIN, B. I. , & PRYER, R. S.The concept of projection: A review . Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 353-374 .
75.
OBEYESEKERE, G.The cult of the Goddess Pattini. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1984.
76.
ORIVE, R.Social projection and social comparison of opinions . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988, 54(6), 953-964 .
77.
PAGE, H. A. , & MARKOWITZ, G.The relationship of defensiveness to rating scale bias . Journal of Psychology. 1955, 40, 431-435 .
78.
PLUTCHIK, R. , KELLERMAN, H. , & CONTE, H. R.A structural theory of ego defenses and emotions. In C. E. Izard (Ed.), Emotions and psychopathology. New York: Plenum , 1979.
79.
POWER, M. , & BREWIN, C. R.From Freud to cognitive science: A contemporary account of the unconscious . British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1991, 30, 289-310 .
80.
ROKEACH, M.Studies in beauty: II. Some determiners of the perception of beauty in women . Journal of Social Psychology, 1945, 22, 155-169 .
81.
SEARS, R. R.Experimental studies of projection: I. Attribution of traits . Journal of Social Psychology, 1936, 7, 151-163 .
82.
SECORD, P. F. , BACKMAN, C. F. , & EACHUS, H. T.Effects of imbalance in the self-concept on the perception of persons . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 442-446 .
83.
SELYE, H.The stress of life (revised ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill , 1976.
84.
SHERWOOD, G. G.Classical and attributive projection . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1979, 88, 635-640 .
85.
SHERWOOD, G. G.Self-serving biases in person perception: A reexamination of projection as a mechanism of defense . Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90(3), 445-459 .
86.
SHERWOOD, G. G.Consciousness and stress reduction in defensive projection: A reply to Holmes . Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 91(2), 372-375 .
87.
SHULMAN, D. G.The investigation of psychoanalytic theory by means of the experimental method . International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1990, 71(3), 487-498 .
88.
SINGER, R. D.A cognitive view of rationalized projection . Journal of Projective Techniques, 1963, 27, 236-243 .
89.
SKYNNER, A. C. R.One flesh: Separate persons. London: Constable , 1976.
90.
STEIN, H. F.Social role and unconscious complementarity . Journal of Psychoanalytic Anthropology, 1986, 9(3), 235-268 .
91.
STEVENS, H. , & REITZ, W.An experimental investigation of projection as a defense mechanism . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1970, 26, 152-154 .
92.
TAUSCHKE, E. , MERSKEY, H. , & HELMES, E.A systematic inquiry into recollections of childhood experiences and their relationship to adult defence mechanisms . British Journal of Psychiatry, 1990, 157, 392-398 .
93.
TAYLOR, S. E. , & FISKE, S. T.Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic , 1978.
94.
VENABLES, P. H. , & CHRISTIE, M. J.Research in Psychophysiology. London: Wiley , 1975, pp. 50-68.
95.
WAGNER, W. , & GERARD, H.Similarity of comparison group, opinions about facts and values and social projection . Archiv fur Psychologie, 1983, 135(4), 313-324 .
96.
WEISSMAN, H. A. , RITTNER, K. , & GORDON, R. M.Reliability study of the defense mechanism inventory . Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, 1237-1238 .
97.
WELLS, W. , & GOLDSTEIN, R.Sears' study of projection: Replications and critique . Journal of Social Psychology, 1964, 64, 169-179 .
98.
WORKIE, A.Inferring personality characteristics of Ethiopian societies from intergroup perceptions . Journal of Psychology, 1985, 119(1), 21-30 .
99.
ZEMORE, R. , & GREENOUGH, T.Reduction of ego threat following attributive projection . Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1973, 8, 343-344 .
100.
ZIMMER, H.The roles of conflict and internalized demands in projection . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 50, 188-192 .
101.
ZUK, G. H.Murder in the family: An analysis of two Poe short stories . Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 1990, 12(6), 467-476 .
