Heightened worker autonomy and participation characterize emerging workplace relations in the 1990s. Some analysts fear that, while such relations may make the workplace more hospitable for workers, they may also undermine workers' solidarity and unity. We investigate this thesis using a telephone survey of a random sample of employed persons from a Midwestern state. Participation increases rather than decreases worker solidarity and it is a more important factor in this regard than job autonomy. In addition, participation heightens workers' concerns with organizational injustice. These findings contrast sharply with fears that heightened autonomy and participation will undermine workers' autonomous cultures of solidarity and resistance.
ABRAMIS, D. J.Semiconductor manufacturing team. In J. R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990, pp. 449-470.
2.
ALTHAUSER, R. & BRAIN, D.Control and Consent in the Work of Health Care Occupations. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, August, 1991.
3.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. American Psychologist: Special Issue on Organizational Psychology, 1990, 45, 2-2.
4.
ARONOWITZ, S.Working-class hero: A new strategy for labor. New York: Pilgrim Press, 1983.
5.
BARON, J. N., JENNINGS, P. D., & BOBBIN, F. R.Mission control: The development of personnel systems in U.S. industry. American Sociological Review, 1988, 53, 497-514.
6.
BREAUGH, J. A.The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 1985, 38, 551-570.
7.
BREAUGH, J. A., & BECKER, A. S.Further examination of the work autonomy scales. Human Relations, 1987, 40, 381-400.
8.
BRECHER, J., & COSTELLO, T.Common sense for hard times. New York: Two Continents, 1976.
9.
BURAWOY, M.Manufacturing consent. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1979.
10.
COLEMAN, J. S.Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology1988, 94 (Suppl.), 95-120.
11.
CORNFIELD, D. B.Economic segmentation and expression of labor unrest: Striking versus quitting in the manufacturing sector. Social Science Quarterly, 1985, 66(2), 247-265.
12.
DERBER, C. & SCHWARTZ, W.Toward a theory of worker participation. Sociological Inquiry, 1983, 53(1), 61-78.
13.
DOHSE, K., JURGENS, U., & MALSCH, T.From "Fordism" to "Toyotism?" The social organization of the labor process in the Japanese automobile industry. Politics and Society, 1985, 14(2), 115-146.
14.
EVANS, B. K. & FISHER, D. G.A hierarchical model of participatory decision-making, job autonomy, and perceived control. Human Relations, 1992, 45, 1169-1189.
15.
FANTASIA, R.Cultures of solidarity. Berkeley: University of California, 1988.
16.
FINLAY, W.Workers' control and control of workers: The Case of West Coast longshoremen. Insurgent Sociologist, 1982, 11(2), 51-61.
17.
FINLAY, W.Work on the waterfront. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1986.
18.
FREEMAN, C.The "understanding" employer. In J. West (Ed.), Work women and the labour market. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983, pp. 135-153.
19.
FRIEDMAN, A.Industry and labour. London: Macmillan, 1977.
20.
GANSTER, D. C., & FUSILIER, M. R.Control in the workplace. In C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989, pp. 235-280.
21.
GARTMAN, D.Ideology in the labor process: A review of Burawoy's Manufacturing Consent. Insurgent Sociologist, 1982, 11(3), 91-95.
22.
GRAHAM, J. W., & VERMA, A.Predictors and moderators of employee responses to employee participation programs. Human Relations, 1991, 44, 551-568.
23.
GRENIER, G. J.Inhuman relations: Quality circles and anti-unionism in American industry. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1988.
24.
HACKMAN, J. R. (Editor). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
25.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
26.
HERMAN, A.Conceptualizing control: Domination and hegemony in the capitalist labor process. Insurgent Sociologist, 1982, 11(3), 7-22.
27.
HODSON, R.Good jobs and bad management: How new problems evokes old solutions-in high-tech settings. In P. England and G. Farkas (Eds.), Industries, firms, and jobs: Sociological and economic approaches. New York: Plenum, 1988, pp. 247-279.
28.
JERMIER, J. M.Sabotage at work. In N. DiTomaso (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1988, pp. 101-134.
29.
JOYCE, P.Work, society and politics: The culture of the factory in late Victorian England. New Brunswick: Rutgers University, 1980.
30.
JURAVICH, T.Chaos on the shop floor. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1985.
31.
KIMELDORF, H.Working class culture, occupational recruitment and union politics. Social Forces, 1985, 64(2).
32.
KLEIN, J. A.A reexamination of autonomy in light of new manufacturing processes. Human Relations, 1991, 44, 21-38.
33.
KUSTERER, K.Know-how on the job: The important working knowledge of "unskilled" workers. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1978.
34.
LAMPHERE, L.Bringing the family to work: Women's culture on the shop floor. Feminist Studies, 1985, 11(3), 519-540.
35.
LITTLER, C. R., & SALAMAN, G.Class at work: The design, allocation, and control of jobs. London: Batsford, 1984.
36.
MARSHALL, G.Some remarks on the study of working-class consciousness. Politics and Society, 1983, 12(3).
37.
MOBERG, D.No more junk: Lordstown workers and the demand for quality. Insurgent Sociologist, 1978, 8(2-3), 63-69.
38.
MONGE, P. R., & MILLER, K. I.Participative processes in organizations. In G. M. Goldhaber and G. A. Barnet (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1988, pp. 213-229.
39.
MONTGOMERY, D.Workers' control in America. New York: Cambridge University, 1979.
40.
ORGAN, D. W.A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. Journal of Management, 1988, 14(4), 547-557.
41.
PARKER, M.Inside the circle: A union guide to OWL. Boston: South End Press, 1985.
42.
PETERSON, R. A., & RATH, M. J.Structural determinants of piecework rates. Industrial Relations, 1964, 4(1), 92-103.
43.
REICH, R. B.Entrepreneurship reconsidered: The team as hero. Harvard Business Review, 1987, 65(3), 77-83.
44.
SIRIANNI, C. (Ed.). Worker participation and the politics of reform. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1987.
45.
SPECTOR, P. E.Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 1986, 39, 1005-1016.
46.
STEVENS, G., & CHO, J. H.Socioeconomic indexes and the new 1980 census occupational classification scheme. Social Science Research, 1985, 14, 142-168.
47.
THOMAS, R.Citizenship and gender in work organizations: Some considerations for theories of the labor process. In M. Burawoy and T. Skocpol (Eds.), Marxist inquiries: Studies of labor, class, and states. American Journal of Sociology, 1992, 88 (Suppl.).
48.
THOMAS, R.Participation and control: A shopfloor perspective on employee participation. In R. Magjuka (Ed.), Annual review of research in the sociology of organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1991.
49.
THOMPSON, W. E.Hanging tongues: A sociological encounter with the assembly line. Qualitative Sociology, 1983, 6(3), 215-237.
50.
VALLAS, S. P.Workers, firms, and the dominant ideology: Hegemony and consciousness in the monopoly core. Sociological Quarterly, 1991, 32(1), 61-83.
51.
WALTON, R. E., & HACKMAN, J. R.Groups under contrasting management strategies. In P. S. Goodman and Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 168-201.
52.
WESTWOOD, S.All day, every day: Factory and family in the making of women's lives. Chicago: University of Illinois, 1984.
53.
YANKELOVICH, D., & IMMERWAHR, J.Putting the work ethic to work. Society, 1984, 21(2), 58-76.
54.
ZETKA, J. R., Jr.Work organization and wildcat strikes in the U.S. auto industry. American Sociological Review, 1992, 57(2), 214-226.
