The authors propose that neither the legalistic, adversarial approach, nor the cooperative approach stands alone as the set of practices that constitutes "good quality" union-management relations. In fact, it is suggested that the ideal union-management relationship is one that is "constructive," a term drawn from the conflict literature. Utilizing data gathered with the Quality of Union-Management Relationship (QUMR) Instrument, evidence is provided that six major factors are related to the effectiveness of a union-management relationship. Two of these factors are classified as cooperative, two as adversarial, and two as neutral. A model of union-management relationships is presented.
ANDREWS, F. W., & HUSZCZO, G. E.Progress Toward the Development of a Measure of the Quality of Union-Management Relationships. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association, New Orleans, 1984.
2.
BAKKE, E. W.Mutual survival: The goals of unions and management. New Haven, CT: Labor and Management Center, Yale University, 1946.
3.
BIASATTI, L. L., & MARTIN, J. E.A measure of the quality of union-management relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64(4), 387-390.
4.
BIASATTI, L. L., MARTIN, J. E. & BARCLAY, L. A.Important Elements in Federal Union-Management Relations. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Midwest Division of the Academy of Management, 1978, pp. 198-209.
5.
BLAKE, R. R., & MOUTON, S. B.The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1964.
6.
BRETT, J. M., & GOLDBERG, S. B.Wildcat strikes in bituminous coal mining. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1979, 9(32), 465-483.
7.
BULLOCK, R. J., MACY, B. A., & MIRVIS, P. H.Assessing unions and union-management collaboration in organizational change. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Camman, (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures and practices. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1983.
8.
DASTMALCHIAN, A., ADAMSON, R., & BLYTqON, P.Developing a measure of industrial relations climate. Industrial Relations, 1986, 41(4), 851-859.
9.
DERBER, M., CHALMERS, W. E., & EDELMAN, M. T.Assessing union-management relationships. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 1961, 1(4), 27-40.
10.
DEUTSCH, M.Conflicts: Productive and destructive. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 7-41.
11.
DUNLOP, J. T.Industrial relations systems. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1958.
12.
DUNLOP, J. T.A systems model. In C. Kerr & P. D. Staudohar (Eds.), Industrial relations in a new age. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1986.
13.
FISHER, R., & BROWN, S.Getting together-Building a relationship that gets to yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1988.
14.
FISHER, R. & URY, W.Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1981.
15.
FUKAMI, C. V., & LARSON, E.The relationship between union commitment and organizational commitment: Dual loyalty re-examined. In K. H. Chung, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. New York.
16.
HARBISON, F. H., & COLEMAN, J. R.Goals and strategy in collective bargaining. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.
17.
HECKSCHER, C. C.The new unionism: Employee involvement in the changing corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
18.
INGRASSIA, A. F.Coefficients of success in federal LMR programss. Civil Service Journal, 197415, 6-10.
19.
KATZ, H. C.Shifting gears: Changing labor relations in the U.S. automobile industry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
20.
KATZ, D., & KAHN, R. L.The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1978.
21.
KILMANN, R. H., AND THOMAS, K. W.Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Psychological Reports, 1975, 37, 971-980.
22.
KOCHAN, T. A., KATZ, H. C., & MCKERSIE, R. B.The transformation of American industrial relations. New York: Basic Books, 1986. (a)
23.
MARTIN, J. E.Union-management problems in the federal government: An exploratory analysis. Public Personnel Management, 1976, 5, 353-362.
24.
PONDY, L. R.Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. In J. M. Thomas, & W. G. Bennis, (Eds.), The Management of change and conflict. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1972, pp. 359-380.
25.
ROBBINS, S. P.Managing organizational conflict: A non-traditional approach. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
26.
ROSEN, N., GREENLAIGH, L., & ANDERSON, J. C.The cognitive structure of industrial/labor relationships. In International review of applied psychology. (Vol. 30), Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981, pp. 217-233.
27.
SLICHTER, S.The challenge of industrial relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1947.
28.
VOOS, P. B.The Practices Consonant with Cooperative Labor Relations. Proceedings of the IRRA Spring Meeting, Anaheim, California, 1989, pp. 483-490.
29.
WALTON, R. E., & MCKERSIE, R. B.A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
30.
ZELLNER, W.The UAW rebels teaming up against teamwork. Business Week, March 27, 1989, 119-119, 114-114.
