This study found that involvement in employee ownership-positive feelings about the program and participation in ownership opportunities-varied by occupation. Highest status employees were most involved. Lower status employees were either uninvolved or cynical about the program. Involvement also varied as a result of union commitments. Employees who favored a union which did not support ownership were less involved in the ownership program.
AIKEN, M., & HAGE, G.Organizational alienation: A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 1966, 31, 497-507.
2.
BLASI, J.Employee ownership: Revolution or ripoff?Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988.
3.
BLAUNER, R.Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
4.
FENWICK, R., & OLSON, J.Support for worker participation: Attitudes among union and non-union employees. American Sociological Review, 1986, 51, 501-522.
5.
KOHN, M., & SCHOOLER, C.Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co., 1984.
6.
MILLER, A., TREIMAN, D., CAIN, P., & ROOS, P.Work, jobs, and occupations: A critical review of the dictionary of occupational titles. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1980.
7.
MILLER, G. A.Professionals in bureaucracy: Alienation among industrial scientists and engineers. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 755-768.
8.
POOLE, M.Worker participation in industry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.
9.
RIFKIN, J.Own your own job. New York: Bantam, 1977.
10.
ROSEN, C., KLEIN, K., & YOUNG, K.Employee ownership in America: The equity solution. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Co., 1986.
11.
RUSSELL, R.Sharing ownership in the workplace. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.
12.
SCHWALBE, M.The psychological consequences of alienated labor. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986.
13.
SEEMAN, M.On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 1959, 24, 783-791.
14.
SEEMAN, M.Alienation and engagement. In A. Campbell and P. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change. New York: The Russel Sage Foundation, 1972, pp. 467-527.
15.
TANNENBAUM, A. (Ed.), Control in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
16.
TUCKER, R., (Ed.). The Marx-Engles reader. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1972.
17.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE. Work in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1973.
18.
WEVER, K. Power, Weakness and Membership Support in Four U.S. Airline Unions. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
19.
WITTE, J.Democracy, authority and alienation in work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
20.
ZIPP, J., LUEBKE, P., & LANDERMAN, R.The social bases of support for workplace democracy. Sociological Perspectives, 1984, 27, 395-425.
