Studies have hypothesized conflicting results regarding the effect of actors' interpersonal attachment on commitment to the encompassing large group. The cohesion approach hypothesizes that interpersonal attachment among actors will enhance group cohesiveness, which produces more commitment to the large group. In contrast, the subgroup approach predicts that interpersonal attachment among actors will contribute more to subgroup fragmentation which sets up barriers to actors' commitment to the large group. We derive hypotheses from these opposing approaches and test the hypotheses over a sample of 1621 employees drawn from 62 work organizations in Korea. The empirical tests indicate the following: (1) Interpersonal attachment among employees in local work units is shown to have a positive effect on commitment to the work organization encompassing the work units. (2) Interpersonal attachment between dissimilar positions in the same work units is shown to have a more positive effect on commitment than that between similar positions. Implications of these findings on the two theories are discussed.
ALLEN, N. J., & MEYER, J. P.The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1990, 63, 1-18.
2.
BECKER, H.Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 1960, 66, 32-40.
3.
BECKER, H. S., & CARPER, J.The elements of identification with an occupation. American Sociological Review, 1956, 21, 341-348.
4.
BIELBY, D., & BIELBY, W.Work commitment, sex-role attitudes, and women's employment. American Sociological Review, 1984, 49, 234-247.
5.
BUCHANAN, B. II.Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974, 19, 533-546.
6.
CARTWRIGHT, D.The nature of group cohesion. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.
7.
COOK, J., & WALL, T.New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfillment. Joumal of Occupational Psychology, 1990, 53, 39-52.
8.
DRESCHER, S., BURLINGAME, G., & FUHRIMAN, A.Cohesion: An odyssey in empirical understanding. Small Group Behavior, 1985, 16, 3-30.
9.
EISENBERGER, R., HUNTINGTON, R., HUTCHISON, S., & SOWA, D.Perceived organizational support. Joumal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 500-507.
10.
FESTINGER, L., SCHACHTER, S., & BACK, K.Social pressures groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1950.
11.
GOODACRE, D. M.The use of a sociometric test as a predictor of combat unit effectiveness. Sociometry, 1951, 14, 148-152.
12.
GRANOVETTER, M. S.The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 1360-1380.
13.
GRANOVETTER, M. S.Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.
14.
GREENHAUS, J. H.A factorial investigation of career salience. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1973, 3, 95-98.
15.
GROSS, N., & MARTIN, W. E.On group cohesiveness. American Joumal of Sociology, 1952, 57, 546-562.
16.
HALABY, C. N.Worker attachment and workplace authority. American Sociological Review, 1989, 51, 634-649.
17.
HALABY, C. N., & WEAKLIEM, D.Worker control and attachment to the firm. American Journal of Sociology, 1989, 95, 549-591.
18.
HALL, J. R.Social organization and pathways of commitment: Types of communal groups, rational choice theory, and Kanter's thesis. American Sociological Review, 1988, 53, 679-692.
19.
HARARY, F., NORMAN, R. Z., & CARTWRIGHT, D.Structural models. New York: Wiley, 1965.
20.
HOGG, M. A., & TURNER, J. C.Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1985, 15, 51-66.
21.
HOMANS, G. C.The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1950.
22.
KANTER, R. M.Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 477-517.
23.
KANTER, R. M.Commitment and community: Communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.
24.
KANTER, R. M.Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
25.
KALLEBERG, A., & BERG, I.Work and industry: Structure, markets and processes. New York: Plenum, 1987.
26.
KELLER, R. T.Predicting absenteeism from prior absenteeism, attitudinal factors and nonattitudinal factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 68, 536-540.
27.
LAWLER, E. J.Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice process theory. American Sociological Review, 1992, 57, 327-339.
28.
LAWLER, E. J., & YOON, J.Power and the Emergence of Commitment Behavior in Negotiated Exchange. American Sociological Review, 1993, 58, 456-481.
29.
LINCOLN, J., & KALLEBERG, A.Culture, control and commitment: A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
30.
LOTT, A. J., & LOTT, B. E.Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequence variables. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 259-309.
31.
MARSH, R. M., & MANNARI, H.Organizational commitment and turnover: A prediction study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 22, 57-75.
32.
MATHIEU, J. E., & ZAJAC, D. M.A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 108, 171-194.
33.
MAYO, E.The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan, 1933.
34.
MAYO, E.The social problems of an industrial civilization. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1945.
35.
MEYER, J. P., & ALLEN, N. J.Testing the "side bet" theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69, 372-378.
36.
MEYER, J. P., & ALLEN, N. J.A longitudinal analysis of the early development and consequences of organizational commitment. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science Review, 1987, 19, 199-215.
37.
MEYER, J. P., ALLEN, N. J., & GELLATLY, I. R.Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75, 710-720.
38.
MORROW, P., & WIRTH, R.Work commitment among salaried professionals. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1989, 34, 40-56.
39.
MOTTAZ, C. J.Determinants of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 1988, 41, 467-482.
40.
MOWDAY, R. T., PORTER, L. W., & STEERS, R.Employee-organizational linkages. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
41.
NORRIS, D., & NIEBUHR, R. E.Group variables and gaming success. Simulation and Games, 1980, 11, 301-312.
42.
PARKER, R. N., & FENWICK, R.The Pareto curve and its utility for open-ended income distributions in survey research. Social Forces, 1983, 61, 872-885.
43.
PORTER, L. W., STEER, R., & MOWDAY, R.Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 603-609.
44.
PRICE, J. L., & MUELLER, C. W.Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1986.
45.
PUTTI, J. M., ARYEE, S., & LIANG, T. K.Work values and organizational commitment: A study in the Asian context. Human Relations, 1989, 42, 275-288.
46.
RABBIE, J. M., & HORWITZ, M.Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 28, 117-123.
47.
RABBIE, J. M., SCHOT, J. C., & VISSER, L.Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioral interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1989, 19, 171-202.
48.
RIDGEWAY, C.The dynamics of small groups. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983.
49.
SCANZONI, J.Social exchange and behavioral interdependence. In R. L. Burgess and T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
50.
SHAW, M. E.Group dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
51.
SHIM, Y.The transformation of the labor market and the female wage labour in Korea. Journal of Korea Women's Studies, 1988, 4, 121-129.
52.
TAJFBL, H.Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press, 1978.
53.
TAJFEL, H.Instrumentality, identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
54.
TAJFEL, H., & TURNER, J. C.An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
55.
TAJFEL, H., & TURNER, J. C.The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. S. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of interpersonal relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1985, pp. 7-24.
56.
TALLMAN, I., GRAY, L., & LEIK, R.Decisions, dependency, and commitment: An exchange based theory of group development. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, and H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group process (Vol. 9). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1991.
