Promotion decisions of 197 managers (63 males, 134 females) from a large not-for-profit organization were investigated using a dependency perspective. Both performance level and organizational connections of a subordinate influenced promotion decisions. Subordinate influence attempts had an impact on promotion recommendations only when a manager was aware of a subordinate's organizational connections. Potential subordinate turnover did not influence promotion decisions by managers. The implications of this study for both practice and research are discussed.
ABRAHAM, K. G., & MEDOFF, J. L.Length of service and promotions union and nonunion workgroups. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1985, 38, 408-420.
2.
BARTOL, K. M., & MARTIN, D. C.Influences on managerial pay allocations: A dependency perspective. Personnel Psychology, 1988, 41, 361-378.
3.
BARTOL, K. M., & MARTIN, D. C.Effects of dependence, dependency threats, and pay secrecy on managerial pay allocations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74, 105-113.
4.
BARTOL, K. M., & MARTIN, D. C.When politics pays: Factors influencing managerial compensation decisions. Personnel Psychology, 1990, 43, 599-614.
5.
DESHPANDE, S. P., & SCHODERBEK, P. P.Pay-allocations by managers: A policy capturing study. Human Relations. In press.
6.
FOSSUM, J. A., & FITCH, M. K.The effects of individual and contextual attributes on the sizes of recommended salary increases. Personnel Psychology, 1985, 38, 587-602.
7.
FRENCH, J. R. P., Jr., & RAVEN, B.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies of social power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, 1959, pp. 150-169.
8.
GREENBERG, J. A.Taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Journal, 1987, 129-22.
9.
GREENBERGER, D. B., & STRASSER, S.The development and application of a model of personal control in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11, 164-177.
10.
HENEMAN, R. L.Merit pay research. In G. R. Ferris and K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Personnel and human resource management (Vol. 8). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1990, pp. 203-263.
11.
KOTTER, J. P.Power and influence. New York: Free Press, 1985.
12.
MARKHAM, W. T., HARLAN, S. L., & HACKETT, E. J.Promotion opportunities in organizations: Causes and consequences. In G. R. Ferris and K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Personnel and human resource management (Vol. 5). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1987.
13.
McENRUE, M. P.The perceived fairness of managerial promotion practices. Human Relations, 1989, 42, 815-827.
14.
MILLS, D. Q.Seniority versus ability in promotion decisions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1985, 38, 421-425.
15.
MOSES, J. L., & BYHAM, W. C. (Eds.). Applying the assessment center method. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 1977.
16.
SCHWAB, D. P., & OLSON, C. A.Merit pay practices: Implication for pay-performance relationship. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1990, 43, 237-255.
17.
STUMPF, S., & LONDON, M.Management promotion: Individual and organizational factors influencing the decision process. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6, 539-549.
18.
WALLACE, M. J., Jr., & FAY, C. H.Compensation theory and practice. Boston: Kent Publishing, 1983.
