This study examined social psychological factors associated with willingness to participate in collective action. These factors were group identification, collectivist orientation, outgroup stereotyping, perceived intergroup conflict, egoistic and collective relative deprivation, and political efficacy. Three hundred and fifty members of a trade union completed questionnaires where items measured these factors along with their prospective participation in a range of union activities. Regression analyses indicated that the most significant correlate of participation was the strength of the respondent's sense of group identification. Other significant correlates were collectivist orientation and the degree to which the outgroup (management) was perceived in a stereotypical fashion. Further analyses were undertaken to examine the possible moderating effect of group identification on the relationships between independent and dependent variables. These indicated a broadly similar pattern of results for both strong and weak group identifiers though collective relative deprivation appeared to be somewhat more important for strong identifiers and political efficacy somewhat more important for weak identifiers. These findings are discussed in the context of research into social identity and collective action in other settings.
ALLEN, P. T. , & STEPHENSON, G. M.Inter-group understanding and size of organization . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1983, 21, 312-329 .
2.
ALLEN, P. T. , & STEPHENSON, G. M.The relationship of inter-group understanding and inter-party friction in industry . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1985, 23, 203-213 .
3.
BROWN, R. J.The effects of intergroup similarity and cooperative versus competitive orientation on intergroup discrimination . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1984. 23, 21-33 .
4.
BROWN, R. J.Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Oxford: Blackwell , 1988.
5.
BROWN, R. J. , & ABRAMS, D. A.The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1986, 22, 78-92 .
6.
BROWN, R. J. , & ROSS, G. F.The battle for acceptance: An explanation into the dynamics of intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1982.
7.
BROWN, R. J. , & WILLIAMS, J. A.Group identification: The same thing to all people?Human Relations, 1984, 37, 547-564 .
8.
BROWN, R. J. , CONDOR, S. , MATHEWS, A. , WADE, G. , & WILLIAMS, J. A.Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 273-287 .
9.
BROWN, R. J. , HINKLE, S. W. , ELY, P. G. , FOX-CARDAMONE, L. , MARAS, P. , & TAYLOR, L. A.Recognising Group Diversity: Individualist-Collectivist and Autonomous-Relational Social Processes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kent , 1992.
10.
CONDOR, S.Sex role beliefs and “traditional” women: Feminist and intergroup perspectives. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press , 1986.
11.
COOK, T. D. , CROSBY, F. , & HENNIGAN, K. M.The construct validity of relative deprivation. In J. M. Suls and R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes. New York: Wiley , 1977.
12.
DION, K. L.Response to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation . In J. M. Olson , C. P. Herman , and M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986.
13.
DUBÉ, L. , & GUIMOND, S.Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue . In J. M. Olson , C. P. Herman , and M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986.
14.
FISKE, S. T.People's reactions to nuclear war . American Psychologist, 1987, 42, 207-217 .
15.
FOSH, P.The active trade unionist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1981.
16.
FOX, D. L. , & SCHOFIELD, J. W.Issue salience, perceived efficacy and perceived risk: A study of the origins of anti-nuclear war activity . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 19, 805-827 .
17.
GORDON, M. E. , & LADD, R. T.Dual allegiance: Renewal, reconsideration and recantation . Personnel Psychology, 1990, 43, 37-69 .
18.
GORDON, M. E. , PHILPOT, J. W. , BURT, R. E. , THOMPSON, C. A. , & SPILLER, W. F.Commitment to the union: Development of a measure and examination of its correlates . Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 1980, 65, 479-499 .
19.
GRANT, P. , & BROWN, R. J.From Ethnocentrism to Collective Protest: Responses to Relative Deprivation and Threats to Social Identity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kent , 1992.
20.
GUIMOND, S. , & DUBÉ-SIMARD, L.Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 526-535 .
21.
HAMILTON, S. B. , KNOX, T. A. , KEILIN, W. G. , & CHAVEZ, E. C.In the eye of the beholder: Accounting for variability in cognitive/affective responses to the threat of nuclear war . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1987, 17, 927-952 .
22.
HASELAU, J. , FOX-CARDAMONE, L. , HINKLE, S. , & BROWN, R. J.The Abortion Controversy: A Look at Activists on Both Sides of the Conflict . Paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Association, Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, May1991.
23.
HEWSTONE, M. , & BROWN, R. J.Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the contact hypothesis. In M. Hewstone and R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Oxford: Blackwell , 1986.
24.
HINKLE, S. W. , & BROWN, R. J.Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams and M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf , 1990.
25.
HINKLE, S. W. , BROWN, R. J. , & ELY, P. G.Individualism/Collectivism, Group Ideology and Intergroup Processes . Paper presented at B.P.S. Annual Conference, London, Dec. 1990.
26.
HOGG, M. A. , & TURNER, J. C.Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1987, 26, 325-340 .
27.
KELLY, C.Intergroup differentiation in a political context . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 27, 319-332 .
28.
KELLY, C.Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1989, 28, 239-250 .
29.
KELLY, C.Social identity and intergroup perceptions in minority-majority contexts . Human Relations, 1990, 43, 583-599 .
30.
KLANDERMANS, P. G.Mobilization and participation in trade union action: An expectancy-value approach . Journal of Occupation Psychology, 1984, 57, 107-120 . (a)
31.
KLANDERMANS, P. G.Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory . American Sociological Review, 1984, 49, 583-600 . (b)
32.
KLANDERMANS, P. G.Trade union participation. In J. F. Hartley and G. M. Stephenson (Eds.), Employment relations: The psychology of power and control at workOxford: Blackwell , 1992.
33.
LAFFIN, M.Managing under pressure: Industrial relations in local government. London: Macmillan , 1989.
34.
LOCATELLI, M. G. , & HOLT, R. R.Anti-nuclear activism, psychic numbing and mental health . International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 143-161 .
35.
MARTIN, J. , BRICKMAN, P. , & MURRAY, A.Moral outrage and pragmatism; Explanations for collective action . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1984, 20, 484-496 .
36.
McSHANE, S. L.The multi-dimensionality of union participation . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 177-187 .
37.
NICHOLSON, N. , URSELL, G. , & BLYTON, P.The dynamics of white collar unionism. London: Academic Press , 1981.
38.
OLSON, J. M. , HERMAN, C. P. , & ZANNA, M. P. (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986.
39.
ROKEACH, M.Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1968.
40.
SCHOFIELD, J. , & PAVELCHAK, M.Fallout from “The Day After”: The impact of a television film on attitudes . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 19, 433-448 .
41.
SHERIF, M.Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul , 1966.
42.
STRUCH, N. , & SCHWARTZ, S. H.Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56, 364-373 .
43.
TAJFEL, H. , & TURNER, J. C.The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. in S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole , 1986.
44.
TAYLOR, D. M. , MOGHADDAM, F. M. , GAMBLE, I. , & ZELLERER, E.Disadvantaged group responses to perceived inequality: From passive acceptance to collective action . Journal of Social Psychology, 1987, 127, 259-272 .
45.
TOUGAS, F. , & VEILLEUX, F.The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation and procedure of implementation on women's responses to affirmative action: A causal modelling approach . Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1988, 20, 16-29 .
46.
TOUGAS, F. , & VEILLEUX, F.Who likes affirmative action: Attitudinal processes among men and women. In F. A. Blanchard and F. S. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag , 1989.
47.
TRIANDIS, H. C. , BONTEMPO, R. , VILLAREAL, M. J. , ASAI, M. , & LUCCA, N.Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54, 323-328 .
48.
TYLER, T. R. , & McGRAW, K. M.The threat of nuclear war: Risk interpretation and behavioural response . Journal of Social Issues, 1983, 39, 25-40 .
49.
VAN DE VALL, M.Labor organizations: A macro- and micro-sociological analysis and comparative basis. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press , 1970.
50.
VAN KNIPPENBERG, A. , & VAN OERS, H.Social identity and equity concerns in intergroup perceptions . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 23, 351-363 .
51.
WALKER, I. , & MANN, L.Unemployment, relative deprivation and social protest . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987, 13, 275-283 .
52.
WALKER, I. , & PETTIGREW, T. F.Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 23, 301-310 .
53.
WHEELER, L. , REIS, H. T. , & BOND, M. H.Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life: The Middle Kingdom and the Melting Pot . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57, 79-86 .
54.
WILDER, D. A.Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization . British Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 23, 323-333 .
55.
WOLF, S. , GREGORY, W. L. , & STEPHAN, W. G.Protection motivation theory: Prediction of intentions to engage in anti-nuclear war behaviours . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1986, 16, 310-321 .
56.
WRIGHT, S. C. , TAYLOR, D. M. , & MOGHADDAM, F. M.Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 58, 994-1003 .
