This paper addresses interactional strategies used by undercover narcotics agents during covert drug transactions. Specific emphasis is given to the extent to which these strategies depend on particular drugs involved. In this regard, four narcotics are examined: marijuana, LSD, crack cocaine, and heroin. Discussion revolves around the concept of "interaction as infiltration," a new reading of dramaturgical theory which considers the relationship between structural (extent of group closure) and qualitative (extent of verbal and nonverbal machination needed to deceive) aspects of role performances. Data for this paper were drawn primarily from ethnograpahic interviews with 35 undercover narcotics agents located in a moderate-sized midwestern (U.S.) municipality.
AHERN, J. F.Police in trouble. New York: Hawthorn, 1972.
2.
ALBRIGHT, H., & ALBRIGHT, A.Acting: The creative process (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1980.
3.
BERNSTEIN, S. K.Fourth amendment: Using the drug courier profile to fight the war on drugs. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1990, 80, 996-1017.
4.
BROWN, M. F.Narcotics investigations in smaller agencies. Police Chief, October 1989, 103-112.
5.
BURKE, K.A grammar of motives. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1945.
6.
BURKE, K.A rhetoric of motives. New York: George Braziller, 1955.
7.
CHRISTIANSEN, H. G.Undercover drug agents: Unsung heroes of modern law enforcement. Police Chief, September 1988, 10.
8.
DOUGLAS, J. D.Investigative social research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1976.
9.
DUNLAP, E., JOHNSON, B., SANABRIA, H., HOLLIDAY, E., LIPSEY, V., M. BARNETT, HOPKINS, W., SOBEL, I., RANDOLPH, D., & CHIN, K., Studying crack users and their criminal careers: The scientific and artistic aspects of locating hard-to-reach subjects and interviewing them about sensitive topics. Contemporary Drug Problems, Spring 1990, 121-143.
10.
FAUPEL, C. E.Heroin use and criminal careers. Qualitative Sociology, 1987, 10, 15-131.
11.
GIRODO, M.Entry and re-entry strain in undercover agents. In V. L. Allen and E. van de Vliert (Eds.), Role transitions. New York: Plenum Press, 1984(a).
12.
GIRODO, M.Undercover Identity: A Social Self in Search of an Audience. Paper presented at the International Interdisciplinary Conference on Self and Identity, University College, Cardiff, United Kingdom, July 9-13, 1984(b).
13.
GIRODO, M.Health and legal issues in undercover narcotics investigations: Misrepresented evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 1985, 3, 299-308.
14.
GLASER, B. G., & STRAUSS, A. L., Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine, 1965.
15.
GOFFMAN, E.Presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor, 1959.
16.
GOFFMAN, E.Strategic interaction. New York: Ballantine, 1969.
17.
GOFFMAN, E.Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper Colophon, 1974.
18.
HELLMAN, A. D.Laws against marijuana. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1975.
19.
HEWITT, J. P.Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1976.
INCIARDI, J.The war on drugs. Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1986.
22.
JACOBS, B.Undercover narcotics agents' deception strategies: Reconsidering presentations of self. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, July 1992.
23.
JOHNSON, J. M.Doing field research. New York: Free Press, 1975.
24.
KARCHMER, C. L.Productivity problems in organized crime enforcement. Police Chief, 1977, 44, 28-30.
25.
LERNER, R. M., KENDALL, P. C., MILLER, D. T., HULTSCH, D. F., & JENSEN, R. A.Psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
26.
LOFLAND, J.Doing social life: The qualitative study of human interaction in natural settings. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1976.
27.
MANNING, P. K.Police work. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977.
28.
MANNING, P. K.The narcs'game. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980.
29.
MANNING, P. K., & REDDLINGER, L. J.Invitational edges of corruption: Some consequences of narcotic law enforcement. In P. E. Rock (Ed.), Drugs and politics. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1977, pp. 279-310.
30.
MANNING, P. K., & REDDLINGER, L. J.Working bases for corruption: Organizational ambiguities and narcotic law enforcement. In A. S. Trebach (Ed.), Drugs, crime, and politics, New York: Praeger, 1978, pp. 60-89.
31.
MARX, G. T.Thoughts on a neglected category of social movement participants: The agent provocateur and the informant. American Journal of Sociology. 1974, 80, 402-442.
32.
MARX, G. T.The new police undercover work. Urban Life; January 1980, 400-446.
33.
MARX, G. T.Ironies of social control: Authorities as contributors to deviance through escalation, nonenforcement, and covert facilitation. Social Problems, 1981, 28, 221-246.
34.
MARX, G. T.Who really gets stung? Some issues raised by the new police undercover work. Crime and Delinquency, April 1982, 165-193.
35.
MARX, G. T.Undercover: Police surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
36.
McGAW, C.Acting is believing. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1975.
37.
MILLER, G. I.Observations on police undercover work. Criminology1987, 25, 27-46.
38.
MURRAY, J. B.An overview of cocaine use and abuse. Psychological Reports1986, 59, 243-264.
39.
SIEBERT, J. L., & GITCHOFF, G. Y.The strategy of narcotics law enforcement: Its implications and effects. Journal of Drug Issues, 1972, 2, 29-36.
40.
SKOLNICK, J. H.A sketch of the policeman's "working personality." In G. F. Cole (Ed.), Criminal justice: Law and politics (3rd ed.). North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury Press, 1980.
41.
SPRADLEY, J. P.Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
42.
WARD, D. Ideology and Generations. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1981.
43.
WICKS, R. J., & PLATT, J. J.Drug abuse: A criminal justice primer. Beverly Hills: Glencoe, 1977.
44.
WILLIAMS, J. R., & GUESS, L. L.The informant: A narcotics enforcement dilemma. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, July-September 1981, 235-245.
45.
WILSHIRE, B.The dramaturgical model of behavior: Its strengths and weaknesses. Symbolic interaction, 1982, 5, 287-297.
