This study sought to develop a valid and reliable measure of the frequency with which individuals choose to engage in self-limiting behavior in groups, i.e., behavior that reduces the individual's influence on or contribution to the performance of a work group's task. In addition, this study explored under what general conditions managers perceive they are most inclined to engage in self-limiting behavior when they are members of a task group. Based on in-depth interviews of managers and executives, and a relevant literature search, 45 conditional statements were developed to encompass the most commonly cited reasons for engaging in self-limiting behavior. Utilizing these statements, a reliable and valid instrument was developed to measure the frequency with which managers perceive themselves engaging in self-limiting behavior. Factor analysis revealed that there were six underlying conditions which precipitate self-limiting behavior on the part of a group member: (1) an indifferent group climate, (2) an unimportant or meaningless task, (3) low task mastery expectations, (4) the presence of a highly qualified member, (5) the presence of a persuasive member, and (6) pressures to conform. The results also suggest that the frequency with which managers report that they engage in self-limiting behavior is not influenced by their age nor by the type of group on which they are reporting.
ALBANESE, R., & VAN FLEET, D. D.Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10, 244-255.
2.
ASCH, S. E.Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Geutzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Carnegie Institute of Technology Press, 1951.
3.
ASCH, S. E.Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 1956, 70.
4.
BROWN, K. A.Explaining group poor performance: An attributional analysis. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 54-63.
5.
CHRISTIE, R., & GEIS, F. L.Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
6.
CONGER, J. A., & KANUNGO, R. N.The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13, 471-482.
7.
CROWNE, D. P., & MARLOWE, D. A.A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960, 24, 349-354.
8.
FELDMAN, D. C.The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 47-53.
9.
FRIEZE, I. H., & RAMSEY, S. J.Nonverbal maintenance of traditional sex roles. In D. N. Ruble, I. H. Frieze, and J. E. Parsons (Eds.), Sex roles: Persistence and change. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32(3), 133-141.
10.
GABLE, R. K.Instrument development in the affective domain. Hingham, Massachusetts: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1986.
11.
GANSTER, D. C., HENNESSEY, H. W., & LUTHANS, F.Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26, 321-331.
12.
GREEN, T. B.An empirical analysis of nominal and interacting groups. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 63-73.
13.
GUSTAFSON, D. H.SHULKA, R. K., DELBECQ, A. L., & WALSTER, G. W.A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, delphi groups and nominal groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 9280-291.
14.
HARKINS, S. G.LATANE, B., & WILLIAMS, K.Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16, 457-465.
15.
HARMAN, H. H.Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
16.
HARVEY, J. B.The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, 1974, 3, 63-80.
17.
HAYS, W. L.Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
18.
HERBERT, T. T., & ESTES, R. W.Improving executive decisions by formalizing dissent: The corporate devil's advocate. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2, 662-667.
19.
HIRSCHMAN, L.Female-Male Differences in Conversational Interaction. Paper presented at the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1973.
20.
JANIS, I. L.Groupthink. Psychology Today, 1971, 3, 43-46, 74-76.
21.
JANIS, I. L.Victims of groupthink. A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1972.
22.
LAFFERTY, J. C., EADY, P. M., & ELMERS, J. M.The desert survival problem. Plymouth, Michigan: Experiential Learning Methods, 1973.
23.
LATANE, B., WILLIAMS, K., & HARKINS, S. G.Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 822-832.
24.
LIBBY, R., TROTMAN, K. T., & ZIMMER, I.Member variation, recognition of expertise, and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 81-87.
25.
LIEBOWITZ, S. J., & DeMEUSE, K. P.Applications of team building. Human Relations, 1982, 35, 1-16.
26.
MACCOBY, E. E., & JACKLIN, C. N.The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.
27.
MEGARGEE, E. I.Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 377-382.
28.
MILES. R. E.Human relations or human resources. Harvard Business Review, 1965, 43, 148-155.
29.
NUNNALLY, J. C.Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1978.
30.
NUTT, P. C.Field experiments which compare the effectiveness of design methods. Decision Sciences, 1976, 7, 739-758.
31.
OLSON, M.The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1965.
32.
POWELL, G. N.Women and men in management. Newburg Park: Sage Publications, 1988.
33.
READY, W. B., & KROEGER, O.Intergroup model building: The Lego man. The annual handbook for group facilitators. Palo Alto, California: University Associates, 1972, p. 36-42.
34.
ROTrER, J. B.Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80.
35.
ROY, J., & BARGMANN, R. E.Tests of multiple independence and the associated confidence bounds. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958, 29, 491-503.
36.
SCHUTZ, W. C.Firo: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Rinehart & Co., 1958.
37.
SMITH, K. K., & BERG, D. N.Paradoxes of grouplife. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
38.
SONNENFELD, J.The hero's farewell. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
39.
STIGLER, G. J.Free riders and collective action: An appendix to theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1974, 5359-365.
40.
STUMPF, S. A., FREEDMAN, R. D., & ZAND, D. E.Judgmental decisions: A study of interactions among group membership, group functioning, and the decision situation. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 765-782.
41.
TABACHNICK, B. G., & FIDELL, L. S.Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1983.
42.
VAN DE VEN, A. H., & DELBECQ, A. L.The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 605-621.
43.
VEIGA, J. F.Mobility influences during managerial career stages. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26, 64-85.
44.
VROOM, V. H., & PAHL, B.Age and risk-taking among managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 12, 15-32.
45.
WALDMAN, D. A., & AVOLIO, B. J.A meta-analysis of age differences in job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 33-38.
46.
WANOUS, M. P., & YOUTZ, M. A.Solution diversity and the quality of group decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29, 149-159.
47.
WEBBER, R. A.The relation of group performance to the age of members in homogeneous groups. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17(3), 570-574.
48.
WELDEN, E., & GARGONE, G.Social Loafing and Cognitive Effort. Proceedings of Academy of Management, Boston, Massachusetts, 1984, p. 403-403.
49.
ZEMKE, R.Team building: Helping people learn to work together. Training and Development, 1978, 12, 23-34.
