This paper reviews the decision situation surrounding the decision to launch the space shuttle Challenger in January 1986 in the light of the groupthink hypothesis. A revised framework is presented that proposes time and leadership style as moderators of the manner in which group characteristics lead to groupthink symptoms.
COURTRIGHT, J. A.A laboratory investigation of groupthink. Communications Monographs, 1978, 45, 229-246.
2.
Time. Fixing NASA. June 9, 1986.
3.
FLOWERS, M. L.A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 888-896.
4.
JANIS, I. L.Victims of groupthinkBoston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
5.
JANIS, I. L.Groupthink (2nd ed., revised). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1983.
6.
LEANA, C. R.A partial test of Janis's groupthink model: Effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making. Journal of Management, 1985, 11, 5-17.
7.
MOORHEAD, G.Groupthink: Hypothesis in need of testing. Group and Organization Studies, 1982, 7429-444.
8.
MOORHEAD, G., & MONTANARI, J. R.Empirical analysis of the groupthink phenomenon. Human Relations, 1986, 39, 399-410.
9.
Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Accident. Washington, D.C.: July 1986.
