Organizations are increasing their use of sophisticated techniques, including video, to communicate with employees. They are also relying more on the use of "stories" and "legends" about leaders as a way of reinforcing their culture. An important issue in both of these trends is the relationship between the actions or behavior of the leader as depicted in the story or message and the values of the individuals who are the target of the story or message. This study examined this issue as it related to interpersonal affect. Sixty-three banking executives, 61 evening MBA students, and 102 full-time undergraduate students completed a work values survey and later viewed one of two video-taped presentations of leadership behavior. Results showed that congruence between a subject's values and the rated values of a leader was associated with greater anticipated satisfaction with the leader. This effect did not depend on the uncertainty of the leader's behavior, but seemed to be contingent on the subject having had substantial prior experience with the type of leadership behavior illustrated.
ARGOTE, L.Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27, 420-432.
2.
ATTENBOROUGH, R. (Producer). Gandhi (Film). Hollywood: Columbia Pictures, 1982.
3.
ATTNEAVE, F.Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1959.
4.
BUONO, A. F., BOWDITCH, J. L., & LEWIS, J. W.When cultures collide: The anatomy of a merger. Human Relations, 1985, 38, 477-500.
5.
CORNELIUS, E. T., ULLMAN, J. C., MEGLINO, B. M., CZAJKA, J., & McNEELY, B.A new approach to the study of worker values and some preliminary results. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association, Orlando, Florida, November 1985.
6.
DEAL, T. E., & KENNEDY, A. A.Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, Massachusetts: Madison-Wesley, 1982.
7.
DRUCKER, P. F.Management and the world's work. Harvard Business Review, 1988, 65-76.
8.
ENGLAND, G. W.Organizational goals and expected behavior of American managers. Academy of Management Journal, 1967, 10, 107-117.
9.
FALLDING, H.A proposal for the empirical study of values. American Sociological Review, 1965, 30, 223-233.
FLAX, S.The toughest bosses in America. Fortune, August 6, 1984, 18-23.
12.
HICKS, L. E.Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 167-184.
13.
KEICHEL, W.The workaholic generation. Fortune, April 10, 1989, 50-62.
14.
KILLMANN, R.Beyond the quick fix. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
15.
KLUCKHOHN, C.Values and value-orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons and E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951.
16.
LOCKE, E. A.The nature and consequences of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizationalpsychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1976.
17.
LOKKER, S. J.Applications of nonbroadcast television. In C. Degen (Ed.), Understanding and using video. New York: Longman, 1985, pp. 25-56.
18.
McCARTHY, R. (Producer). Patton (Film).Hollywood: Twentieth Century-Fox, 1970.
19.
MEGLINO, B. M., RAVLIN, E. C., & ADKINS, C. L.A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74, 424-432.
20.
MEINDL, J. R.On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 1990, 12, 159-203.
21.
MILLER, G. A.WWhat is information measurement?American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 3-11.
22.
OTT, J. S.The organizational culture perspective. Chicago: Dorsey Press, 1989.
23.
PATTERSON, G. A.Nissan workers reject UAW bid to organize plant in Tennessee. The Wall Street Journal, July 28, 1989, A3-A3.
24.
PETERS, T. J., & WATERMAN, R. H.In search of excellence. New York: Harper and Row, 1982.
25.
RAVLIN, E. C., & MEGLINO, B. M.Effect of values on perception and decision making: A study of alternative work values measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72, 666-673.
26.
RAVLIN, E. C., & MEGLINO, B. M.The transitivity of work values: Hierarchical preference ordering of socially desirable stimuli. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989, 44, 494-508.
27.
ROKEACH, M.The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.
28.
SALANCIK, G. R., & PFEFFER, J.An examination of need satisfaction models of job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 22, 427-456.
29.
SCHALL, M. S.A communication-rules approach to organizational culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 557-581.
30.
SCHEIN, E. H.Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
31.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., KINICKI, A. J., & SCHRIESHEIM, J. F.The effect of leniency on leader behavior descriptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23, 1-29.
32.
SHANNON, C. E., & WEAVER, W.The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
33.
SPENCE, J. T.Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 1285-1295.
34.
The Video Age. White Plains, New York: Knowledge Industry Publications, 1982.
35.
VAN MAANEN, J.Introduction. In J. Van Maanen, J. M. Dabbs, Jr., and R. R. Faulkner (eds.), Varieties of qualitative research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1982, pp. 7-10.
36.
WILLIAMS, R. M., Jr.The concept of values. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan, 1968, pp. 283-287.
