Many employees spend a significant portion of their workday commuting to and from work, albeit with considerable day-to-day variability in those commutes. Based on the time-scarcity perspective, scholars have reached a consensus that time spent commuting is generally draining for employees. This raises an important question: Do all employees have negative reactions to longer commuting times? Challenging this view, we use a temporally based chronotype fit perspective to argue that time spent commuting is less fatiguing for some people compared to others. We propose that at the within-person level, morning (evening) commuting time negatively relates to work (family) role performance via fatigue at work (home). The chronotype moderates the within-individual effects of time spent commuting on fatigue and performance at work and home. The harmful effects of time spent commuting on fatigue and performance are attenuated for persons with a biological preference for evening activity. These effects stand in contrast to previous research that predicted workplace advantages for those individuals with a biological preference for morning activity. We also propose the spillover effects of fatigue at work on fatigue at home and of work role performance on family role performance. Two experience sampling method surveys largely support our hypotheses.
AdanAArcherSNHidalgoMP, et al. (2012) Circadian typology: A comprehensive review. Chronobiology International29(9): 1153–1175.
2.
AshforthBEKreinerGEFugateM (2000) All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro-role transitions. Academy of Management Review25(3): 472–491.
3.
AsparouhovTMuthénB (2019) Latent variable centering of predictors and mediators in multilevel and time-series models. Structural Equation Modeling26(1): 119–142.
4.
BaehrEKRevelleWEastmanCI (2000) Individual differences in the phase and amplitude of the human circadian temperature rhythm: With an emphasis on morningness–eveningness. Journal of Sleep Research9(2): 117–127.
5.
BakkerABDemeroutiE (2013) The spillover–crossover model. In: GrzywaczJDemeroutiE (eds.) Current Issues in Work and Organisational Psychology: New Frontiers in Work and Family Research. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 55–70.
6.
BakkerABDemeroutiEBurkeR (2009) Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover–crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology14(1): 23–33.
7.
BakkerABXanthopoulouD (2009) The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology94(6): 1562–1571.
8.
BealDJWeissHMBarrosE, et al. (2005) An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology90(6): 1054–1068.
9.
BennettAACampionEDKeelerKR, et al. (2021) Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. Journal of Applied Psychology106(3): 330–344.
10.
BrislinRW (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In: LonnerWJBerryJW (eds.) Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 137–164.
11.
BuckAANeffLA (2012) Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology26(5): 698–708.
12.
CalderwoodCMitropoulosT (2021) Commuting spillover: A systematic review and agenda for research. Journal of Organizational Behavior42(2): 162–187.
13.
ChenYPShafferMWestmanM, et al. (2014) Family role performance: Scale development and validation. Applied Psychology63(1): 190–218.
14.
CooganANMcGowanNM (2017) A systematic review of circadian function, chronotype and chronotherapy in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders9(3): 129–147.
15.
DawsonDMcCullochK (2005) Managing fatigue: It’s about sleep. Sleep Medicine Reviews9(5): 365–380.
16.
DeVoeSEPfefferJ (2007) When time is money: The effect of hourly payment on the evaluation of time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes104(1): 1–13.
17.
DeVoeSEPfefferJ (2011) Time is tight: How higher economic value of time increases feelings of time pressure. Journal of Applied Psychology96(4): 665–676.
18.
DijkDJLockleySW (2002) Integration of human sleep–wake regulation and circadian rhythmicity. Journal of Applied Physiology92(2): 852–862.
19.
DöringH (1995) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
20.
ElferingAIgicIKritzerR, et al. (2020) Commuting as a work-related demand: Effects on work-to-family conflict, affective commitment, and intention to quit. PsyCh Journal9(4): 562–577.
21.
EmreODe SpiegeleareS (2021) The role of work–life balance and autonomy in the relationship between commuting, employee commitment and well-being. International Journal of Human Resource Management32(11): 2443–2467.
22.
EtkinJEvangelidisIAakerJ (2015) Pressed for time? Goal conflict shapes how time is perceived, spent, and valued. Journal of Marketing Research52(3): 394–406.
23.
EvansPBartoloméF (1984) The changing pictures of the relationship between career and family. Journal of Organizational Behavior5(1): 9–21.
24.
FroneMRTidwellMCO (2015) The meaning and measurement of work fatigue: Development and evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Work Fatigue Inventory (3D-WFI). Journal of Occupational Health Psychology20(3): 273–288.
25.
GerpottFHRivkinWUngerD (2023) Autonomous or controlled self-regulation, that is the question: A self-determination perspective on the impact of commuting on employees’ domain-specific functioning. Organizational Psychology Review13(1): 67–95.
26.
GreenhausJHPowellGN (2006) When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review31(1): 72–92.
27.
GrzywaczJGMarksNF (2000) Reconceptualizing the work–family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology5(1): 111–126.
28.
GuaranaCLBarnesCMOngWJ (2021) The effects of blue-light filtration on sleep and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology106(5): 784–796.
29.
GuniaBCBarnesCMSahS (2014) The morality of larks and owls: Unethical behavior depends on chronotype as well as time of day. Psychological Science25(12): 2272–2274.
30.
GuniaBCGishJJMensmannM (2021) The weary founder: Sleep problems, ADHD-like tendencies, and entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice45(1): 175–210.
31.
HahnCCowellJMWiprzyckaUJ, et al. (2012) Circadian rhythms in executive function during the transition to adolescence: The effect of synchrony between chronotype and time of day. Developmental Science15(3): 408–416.
32.
HuangMZhanMHuangR, et al. (2023) How commuting time influences hedonic consumption: The role of perceived stress. Journal of Consumer Behaviour22(2): 439–454.
33.
HumagainPSingletonPA (2020) Would you rather teleport or spend some time commuting? Investigating individuals’ teleportation preferences. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour74: 458–470.
34.
JachimowiczJMCunninghamJLStaatsBR, et al. (2021) Between home and work: Commuting as an opportunity for role transitions. Organization Science32(1): 64–85.
35.
KatzDKahnRL (1978) Organizations and the System Concept. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
36.
KerkhofGA (1985) Inter-individual differences in the human circadian system: A review. Biological Psychology20(2): 83–112.
37.
KruegerGP (1989) Sustained work, fatigue, sleep loss and performance: A review of the issues. Work & Stress3(2): 129–141.
38.
KühnelJBledowRKieferM (2022) There is a time to be creative: The alignment between chronotype and time of day. Academy of Management Journal65(1): 218–247.
39.
Las HerasMRofcaninYMatthijs BalP, et al. (2017) How do flexibility i-deals relate to work performance? Exploring the roles of family performance and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior38(8): 1280–1294.
40.
LimSIliesRKoopmanJ, et al. (2018) Emotional mechanisms linking incivility at work to aggression and withdrawal at home: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Management44(7): 2888–2908.
41.
MaLYeR (2019) Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity?Journal of Transport Geography76: 130–141.
42.
McNairDMLorrMDropplemanLF (1971) Profile of Mood States Manual. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
43.
MitchellTRJamesLR (2001) Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review26(4): 530–547.
44.
MonkTHBuysseDJReynoldsCF, et al. (1997) Circadian rhythms in human performance and mood under constant conditions. Journal of Sleep Research6(1): 9–18.
45.
NataleVCicognaP (2002) Morningness–eveningness dimension: Is it really a continuum?Personality and Individual Differences32(5): 809–816.
46.
NovacoRWStokolsDCampbellJ, et al. (1979) Transportation, stress, and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology7(4): 361–380.
47.
PreacherKJCurranPJBauerDJ (2006) Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics31(4): 437–448.
48.
PreacherKJZyphurMJZhangZ (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods15(3): 209–233.
49.
RoennebergTKuehnleTJudaM, et al. (2007) Epidemiology of the human circadian clock. Sleep Medicine Reviews11(6): 429–438.
50.
SchmidtCColletteFCajochenC, et al. (2007) A time to think: Circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology24(7): 755–789.
51.
SiuOLBakkerABBroughP, et al. (2015) A three-wave study of antecedents of work–family enrichment: The roles of social resources and affect. Stress and Health31(4): 306–314.
52.
SmithCSFolkardSSchmiederRA, et al. (2002) Investigation of morning–evening orientation in six countries using the preferences scale. Personality and Individual Differences32(6): 949–968.
53.
SnijdersTBoskerR (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London, UK: Sage.
54.
SonnentagSZijlstraFR (2006) Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology91(2): 330–350.
55.
StradlingS (2002) Transport user needs and marketing public transport. Municipal Engineer151(1): 23–28.
56.
StutzerAFreyBS (2008) Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. Scandinavian Journal of Economics110(2): 339–366.
57.
TankovaIAdanABuela-CasalG (1994) Circadian typology and individual differences: A review. Personality and Individual Differences16(5): 671–684.
58.
The Commuting Monitoring Report of Major Chinese Cities (2022) Commuting monitoring report of 36 cities of China, 2022. Available at: https://huiyan.baidu.com/cms/report/2022tongqin/ (accessed 7 November 2024).
VanderbiltT (2008) Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says about Us). New York, NY: Knopf Doubleday.
61.
VolkSWaldmanDABarnesCM (2023) A circadian theory of paradoxical leadership. Academy of Management Review48(4): 611–638.
62.
WangMLiaoHZhanY, et al. (2011) Daily customer mistreatment and employee sabotage against customers: Examining emotion and resource perspectives. Academy of Management Journal54(2): 312–334.
63.
WayneSJLemmonGHooblerJM, et al. (2017) The ripple effect: A spillover model of the detrimental impact of work–family conflict on job success. Journal of Organizational Behavior38(6): 876–894.
64.
WieseBSChailliéONoppeneyR, et al. (2020) Daily experiences of commuting strain and self-control at work and at home. Journal of Personnel Psychology19(3): 125–134.
65.
YamKCFehrRBarnesCM (2014) Morning employees are perceived as better employees: Employees’ start times influence supervisor performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology99(6): 1288–1299.
66.
ZhouLWangMChangCH, et al. (2017) Commuting stress process and self-regulation at work: Moderating roles of daily task significance, family interference with work, and commuting means efficacy. Personnel Psychology70(4): 891–922.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
