Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-2
How narcissism,promotion criteria,and empowering leadership jointly influence creativity through diverse information searching: An expectancy perspective
While narcissism is commonly regarded as a dark personality trait associated with many negative outcomes, it also carries potential benefits. How to suppress the negative aspects of narcissism and promote its benefits has important implications for both scholars and practitioners. This study proposes two managerial practices (i.e. promotions based on relative performance and empowering leadership) that motivate employees with high narcissism to bring benefits to the workplace. Drawing on expectancy theory, we theorize that narcissism, promotions based on relative performance, and empowering leadership each influence valence, instrumentality, and expectancy, respectively, thereby driving diverse information searching, which indirectly increases radical and incremental creativity. The results of a multi-time and multi-source field study of 462 employees on 88 teams indicate that narcissism is positively associated with diverse information searching when team leaders evaluate promotions based on relative performance and empower narcissistic employees. Moreover, there is an indirect relationship between a three-way interaction (i.e. narcissism × promotions based on relative performance × empowering leadership) and radical and incremental creativity via diverse information searching. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and practical implications of these findings, offering insights into more effective management of employees with high narcissism at work.
AhearneMMathieuJRappA (2005) To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology90(5): 945–955.
2.
AmabileTM (1996) Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westward Press.
3.
AmesDRRosePAndersonCP (2006) The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality40(4): 440–450.
4.
BaerM (2010) The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology95(3): 592–601.
5.
BaerM (2012) Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal55(5): 1102–1119.
6.
BambergerPAdmati-DvirMHarelG (1995) Gender-based wage and promotion discrimination in Israeli high-technology firms: Do unions make a difference?Academy of Management Journal38(6): 1744–1761.
7.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
BanksGCDionneSDMastMS, et al. (2022) Leadership in the digital era: A review of who, what, when, where, and why. The Leadership Quarterly33(5): 101634.
9.
BarrickMRMountMKLiN (2013) The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review38(1): 132–153.
10.
BeehrTATaberTDWalshJT (1980) Perceived mobility channels: Criteria for intraorganizational job mobility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance26(2): 250–264.
11.
BensonAJJordanCHChristieAM (2016) Narcissistic reactions to subordinate role assignment: The case of the narcissistic follower. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin42(7): 985–999.
12.
BrislinRW (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In: LonnerWJBerryJW (eds) Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 137–164.
13.
CampbellWKBrunellABFinkelEJ (2006) Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In: VohsKDFinkelEJ (eds) Self and Relationships: Connecting Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Processes. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 57–83.
14.
CampbellWKGoodieASFosterJD (2004) Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making17(4): 297–311.
15.
CampbellWKHoffmanBJCampbellSM, et al. (2011) Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review21(4): 268–284.
16.
CaniëlsMCJDe JongJPSibbelH (2022) The curvilinear relation between work predictability and creativity. Creativity Research Journal34(3): 308–323.
17.
CheongMSpainSMYammarinoFJ, et al. (2016) Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly27(4): 602–616.
18.
Dahmen-WassenbergPKämmerleMUnterrainerH-F, et al. (2016) The relation between different facets of creativity and the dark side of personality. Creativity Research Journal28(1): 60–66.
19.
FerrisGRBuckleyMRAllenGM (1992) Promotion systems in organizations. Human Resource Planning15(3): 47–68.
20.
GabrielMTCritelliJWEeJS (1994) Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness. Journal of Personality62(1): 143–155.
21.
GilsonLLMadjarN (2011) Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts5(1): 21–28.
22.
GoncaloJAFlynnFJKimSH (2010) Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(11): 1484–1495.
23.
GongYWuJSongLJ, et al. (2017) Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Applied Psychology102(5): 829–844.
24.
GrapsasSBrummelmanEBackMD, et al. (2020) The ‘why’ and ‘how’ of narcissism: A process model of narcissistic status pursuit. Perspectives on Psychological Science15(1): 150−172.
25.
GrijalvaENewmanDA (2015) Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta-analysis and consideration of collectivist culture, big five personality, and narcissism’s facet structure. Applied Psychology64(1): 93–126.
26.
GrijalvaEHarmsPDNewmanDA, et al. (2015) Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology68(1): 1–47.
27.
GrijalvaEMaynesTDBaduraKL, et al. (2020) Examining the ‘I’ in team: A longitudinal investigation of the influence of team narcissism composition on team outcomes in the NBA. Academy of Management Journal63(1): 7–33.
28.
HarrisTBLiNBoswellWR, et al. (2014) Getting what’s new from newcomers: Empowering leadership, creativity, and adjustment in the socialization context. Personnel Psychology67(3): 567−604.
29.
HirstGVan KnippenbergDZhouJ, et al. (2015) Heard it through the grapevine: Indirect networks and employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology100(2): 567–574.
30.
HofmannDAGavinMB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management24(5): 623–641.
31.
HomanACVan KnippenbergDVan KleefGA, et al. (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology92(5): 1189–1199.
32.
HowesSSKauselEEJacksonAT, et al. (2020) When and why narcissists exhibit greater hindsight bias and less perceived learning. Journal of Management46(8): 1498–1528.
33.
HumborstadSIWKuvaasB (2013) Mutuality in leader–subordinate empowerment expectation: Its impact on role ambiguity and intrinsic motivation. The Leadership Quarterly24(2): 363–377.
34.
JaussiKSRandelAE (2014) Where to look? Creative self-efficacy, knowledge retrieval, and incremental and radical creativity. Creativity Research Journal26(4): 400–410.
35.
JiYLiuHLiuS, et al. (2023) Are narcissists more creative? Only if we believe it: How narcissism can relate to creativity. Frontiers in Psychology13: 1091770.
36.
JohnOPRobinsRW (1994) Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66(1): 206−219.
37.
JonasonPKAbboudRToméJ, et al. (2017) The dark triad traits and individual differences in self-reported and other-rated creativity. Personality and Individual Differences117: 150–154.
38.
JonesSLShahPP (2016) Diagnosing the locus of trust: A temporal perspective for trustor, trustee, and dyadic influences on perceived trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology101(3): 392–414.
39.
JudgeTALepineJARichBL (2006) Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology91(4): 762–776.
40.
KauselEECulbertsonSSLeivaPI, et al. (2015) Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes131: 33–50.
41.
KonrathSHoM-HZarinsS (2016) The strategic helper: Narcissism and prosocial motives and behaviors. Current Psychology35(2): 182–194.
42.
KrizanZHerlacheAD (2018) The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review22(1): 3–31.
43.
LazearEPRosenS (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy89(5): 841–864.
44.
LebretonJMShiverdeckerLKGrimaldiEM (2018) The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior5(1): 387–414.
45.
LiNChiaburuDSKirkmanBL (2017) Cross-level influences of empowering leadership on citizenship behavior: Organizational support climate as a double-edged sword. Journal of Management43(4): 1076–1102.
46.
LiQMaggittiPGSmithKG, et al. (2013) Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal56(3): 893–916.
47.
LitchfieldRCGilsonLLGilsonPW (2015) Defining creative ideas: Toward a more nuanced approach. Group & Organization Management40(2): 238–265.
48.
LittleTDCunninghamWAShaharG, et al. (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal9(2): 151–173.
49.
LiuXMaoJ-YZhengX, et al. (2022) When and why narcissism leads to taking charge? The roles of coworker narcissism and employee comparative identity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology95(4): 758–787.
50.
LiuYLiYHaoX, et al. (2019) Narcissism and learning from entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing34(3): 496–512.
51.
MadjarNGreenbergEChenZ (2011) Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology96(4): 730–743.
52.
MagniMMarupingLM (2013) Sink or swim: Empowering leadership and overload in teams’ ability to deal with the unexpected. Human Resource Management52(5): 715–739.
53.
MalikMARChoiJNButtAN (2019) Distinct effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards on radical and incremental creativity: The moderating role of goal orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior40(9–10): 1013–1026.
54.
MaoJ-YQuanJLiY, et al. (2021) The differential implications of employee narcissism for radical versus incremental creativity: A self-affirmation perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior42(7): 933–949.
55.
MartinsenØLArnulfJKFurnhamA, et al. (2019) Narcissism and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences142: 166–171.
56.
MillerJDBackMDLynamDR, et al. (2021) Narcissism today: What we know and what we need to learn. Current Directions in Psychological Science30(6): 519–525.
57.
MorfCCRhodewaltF (2001) Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry12(4): 177–196.
NevickaBBaasMTen VeldenFS (2016) The bright side of threatened narcissism: Improved performance following ego threat. Journal of Personality84(6): 809–823.
60.
NgTWHYamKC (2019) When and why does employee creativity fuel deviance? Key psychological mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology104(9): 1144–1163.
61.
O’BoyleJEHForsythDRBanksGC, et al. (2012) A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology97(3): 557–579.
62.
OldhamGRCummingsA (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal39(3): 607–634.
63.
RaiAKimM (2021) Empowering leadership and followers’ good and bad behaviors: A dual mediation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly32(4): 537–558.
64.
RodanSGalunicC (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal25(6): 541–562.
65.
RosenbaumJE (1984) Career Mobility in a Corporate Hierarchy. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
66.
ShalleyCEZhouJOldhamGR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?Journal of Management30(6): 933–958.
67.
TangCYeL (2015) Diversified knowledge, R&D team centrality and radical creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management24(1): 123–135.
68.
TangCZhangGNaumannSE (2017) When do structural holes in employees’ networks improve their radical creativity? A moderated mediation model. R&D Management47(5): 755–766.
69.
TangCZhangYReiter-PalmonR (2020) Network centrality, knowledge searching and creativity: The role of domain. Creativity and Innovation Management29(1): 72–84.
70.
TettRPBurnettDD (2003) A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology88(3): 500–517.
71.
TwengeJMCampbellSM (2008) Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology23(8): 862–877.
72.
VroomVH (1964) Work and Motivation. Oxford: Wiley.
73.
WallaceHMBaumeisterRF (2002) The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(5): 819–834.
74.
WanousJPReichersAEHudyMJ (1997) Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology82(2): 247–252.
75.
WebsterBDSmithMB (2019) The dark triad and organizational citizenship behaviors: The moderating role of high involvement management climate. Journal of Business and Psychology34(5): 621–635.
76.
WilliamsSDWilliamsJR (2017) Employee narcissism’s implications for performance management: A review and research directions. Organization Management Journal14(4): 198–212.
77.
WuJBTsuiASKinickiAJ (2010) Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal53(1): 90–106.
78.
WuWWangHWangX (2022) Entrepreneur narcissism and new venture performance: A learning perspective. Journal of Business Research149: 901–915.
79.
ZhangXBartolKM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal53(1): 107–128.
80.
ZhangYQuHWalterF, et al. (2023) A new perspective on time pressure and creativity: Distinguishing employees’ radical versus incremental creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior44(9): 1400–1418.
81.
ZhaoY-XZhouKLiuW-X (2023) Why and when narcissistic employees are more creative in the workplace? A social cognitive perspective. Management and Organization Review19(3): 567–593.
82.
ZhongMGaoZSongLJ (2022) Pay it forward or keep it for myself? How narcissism shapes daily prosocial motivation and behavior after receiving help. Journal of Vocational Behavior135: 103721.
83.
ZhouKLiuWLiM, et al. (2020) The relationship between narcissism and taking charge: The role of energy at work and hierarchical level. Psychological Reports123(2): 472–487.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
