Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-5
Paradoxical effects of narcissism on creative performance: Roles of leader–follower narcissism (in)congruence and follower identification with the leader
What is the effect of trait narcissism on creative performance? Although both constructs share an emphasis on uniqueness and novelty, prior investigations of the narcissism–creative performance relationship have produced inconsistent findings and failed to provide conclusive answers to this question. One possible reason for the seemingly contradictory evidence is that extant research has examined the influences of leader and follower narcissism separately rather than simultaneously. In this study, we address this issue by investigating leader–follower narcissism (in)congruence to comprehensively understand when and why leader or follower narcissism is beneficial or detrimental to creative performance. Integrating the self-orientation model of narcissism and narcissistic-tolerance theory, we posit that leader and follower narcissism jointly influence creative performance via identification with the leader, and that different leader–follower narcissism (in)congruence combinations exhibit distinct effects. The analyses of two-wave, two-level, and multi-source data from 421 followers and 54 direct leaders, using cross-level polynomial regressions, support our hypotheses: (1) identification with the leader is maximized when leader narcissism and follower narcissism are congruent; (2) identification with the leader is minimized when leader narcissism is higher than follower narcissism; and (3) identification with the leader mediates the effects of leader–follower narcissism (in)congruence combinations on creative performance.
AmabileTM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity”. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2.
AmesDRRosePAndersonCP (2006) The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality40(4): 440–450.
3.
AnandSMeuserJDVidyarthiPR, et al. (2022) A multi-level model of I-deals in workgroups: Employee and coworker perceptions of leader fairness, I-deals and group performance. Journal of Management Studies59(2): 489–517.
4.
AndersonNPotočnikKZhouJ (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management40(5): 1297–1333.
5.
AronAAronEN (1986) Love and the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing/Harper & Row.
6.
AronAAronEN (1996) Self and self-expansion in relationships. In: FletcherGJOFitnessJ (eds) Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychology Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 325–344.
7.
AshforthBESchinoffBSRogersKM (2016) “I identify with her,” “I identify with him”: Unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations. Academy of Management Review41(1): 28–60.
8.
AtwaterLEOstroffCYammarinoFJ, et al. (1998) Self–other agreement: Does it really matter?Personnel Psychology51(3): 577–598.
9.
BachrachDYongKPatelP, et al. (2023) Birds of a feather? Firm sales growth and narcissism in the upper echelons at the CEO–TMT interface. Leadership Quarterly34(2): 101621.
10.
BliesePD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 349–381.
11.
BraunS (2017) Leader narcissism and outcomes in organizations: A review at multiple levels of analysis and implications for future research. Frontiers in Psychology8: 260159.
12.
BrislinRW (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In: LonnerWJBerryJW (eds) Field Methods in Cross-cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 137–164.
13.
BrownDJ (2012) In the minds of followers: Follower-centric approaches to leadership. In: DayDVAntonakisJ (eds) The Nature of Leadership. 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 331–362.
14.
BurtonKAAdamsJMHartW, et al. (2017) You remind me of someone awesome: Narcissistic tolerance is driven by perceived similarity. Personality and Individual Differences104: 499–503.
15.
ByronKKhazanchiS (2012) Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin138(4): 809–830.
16.
CampbellWK (1999) Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(6): 1254–1270.
17.
CampbellWKFosterCA (2002) Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(4): 484–495.
18.
CampbellWKFosterJD (2007) The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In: SedikidesCSpencerS (eds) Frontiers in Social Psychology: The Self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 115–138.
19.
CampbellWKGreenJD (2007) Narcissism and interpersonal self-regulation. In: WoodJVTesserAHolmesJG (eds) Self and Relationships. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 73–94.
20.
CampbellWKBrunellABFinkelEJ (2006) Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In: FinkelEJVohsKD (eds) Self and Relationships: Connecting Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Processes. New York, NY: Guilford, 57–83.
21.
CampbellWKHoffmanBJCampbellSM, et al. (2011) Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review21(4): 268–284.
22.
CarlsonEN (2013) Honestly arrogant or simply misunderstood? Narcissists’ awareness of their narcissism. Self and Identity12(3): 259–277.
23.
CarnevaleJBHuangLCredéM, et al. (2017) Leading to stimulate employees’ ideas: A quantitative review of leader–member exchange, employee voice, creativity, and innovative behavior. Applied Psychology66(4): 517–552.
24.
CarnevaleJBHuangLHarmsPD (2018) Leader consultation mitigates the harmful effects of leader narcissism: A belongingness perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes146: 76–84.
25.
ChaJChangYKKimT-Y (2014) Person–organization fit on prosocial identity: Implications on employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics123: 57–69.
26.
CohenANahum-ShaniIDovehE (2010) Further insight and additional inference methods for polynomial regression applied to the analysis of congruence. Multivariate Behavioral Research45(5): 828–852.
27.
ColeMSCarterMZZhangZ (2013) Leader–team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: The mediating role of procedural justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology98(6): 962–973.
28.
CragunOROlsenKJWrightPM (2020) Making CEO narcissism research great: A review and meta-analysis of CEO narcissism. Journal of Management46(6): 908–936.
29.
CredéMHarmsPDNiehorsterS, et al. (2012) An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102(4): 874–888.
30.
DulebohnJHBommerWHLidenRC, et al. (2012) A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader–member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management38(6): 1715–1759.
31.
EdwardsJR (2002) Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In: DrasgowFSchmittNW (eds) Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 350–400.
32.
EdwardsJRCableDM (2009) The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology94(3): 654–677.
33.
EdwardsJRParryME (1993) On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal36(6): 1577–1613.
34.
EpitropakiOSyTMartinR, et al. (2013) Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. Leadership Quarterly24(6): 858–881.
35.
EteZEpitropakiOZhouQ, et al. (2022) Leader and organizational behavioral integrity and follower behavioral outcomes: The role of identification processes. Journal of Business Ethics176(4): 741–760.
36.
FreudS (1914/1957) On narcissism: An introduction. In: StracheyJ (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press, 67–104.
37.
FurnhamAHughesDMarshallE (2013) Creativity, OCD, narcissism and the Big Five personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity10: 91–98.
38.
GalvinBMWaldmanDABalthazardP (2010) Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology63(3): 509–537.
39.
GibsonCBCooperCDCongerJA (2009) Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams. Journal of Applied Psychology94(1): 62–76.
40.
GoncaloJAFlynnFJKimSH (2010) Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(11): 1484–1495.
41.
GongYHuangJ-CFarhJ-L (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 765–778.
42.
GrijalvaEHarmsPD (2014) Narcissism: An integrative synthesis and dominance complementarity model. Academy of Management Perspectives28(2): 108–127.
43.
GrijalvaENewmanDA (2015) Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta-analysis and consideration of collectivist culture, Big Five personality, and narcissism’s facet structure. Applied Psychology64(1): 93–126.
44.
GrijalvaEZhangL (2016) Narcissism and self-insight: A review and meta-analysis of narcissists’ self-enhancement tendencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin42(1): 3–24.
45.
GuQTangTL-PJiangW (2015) Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics126(3): 513–529.
46.
HarmsPD (2022) Bad is stronger than good: A review of the models and measures of dark personality. Zeitschrift für Psychologie230(4): 280–289.
47.
HarmsPDBaiYHanGH (2016) How leader and follower attachment styles are mediated by trust. Human Relations69(9): 1853–1876.
48.
HarmsPDSpainSHannahS (2011) Leader development and the dark side of personality. Leadership Quarterly22(3): 495–509.
49.
HartWAdamsJM (2014) Are narcissists more accepting of others’ narcissistic traits?Personality and Individual Differences64: 163–167.
50.
HeiseDR (1972) Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analyses. Sociological Methods & Research1(2): 147–173.
51.
HirstGVan DickDVan KnippenbergD (2009) A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior30(7): 963–982.
52.
HofstedeGH (1980) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
HoganRKaiserR (2005) What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology9(2): 169–180.
54.
HuangLKrasikovaDVHarmsPD (2020) Avoiding or embracing social relationships? A conservation of resources perspective of leader narcissism, leader–member exchange differentiation, and follower voice. Journal of Organizational Behavior41(1): 77–92.
55.
IgraA (1979) On forming variable set composites to summarize a block recursive model. Social Science Research8(3): 253–264.
56.
JakobwitzSEganV (2006) The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences40(2): 331–339.
57.
JansenKJKristof-BrownAL (2005) Marching to the beat of a different drummer: Examining the impact of pacing congruence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes97(2): 93–105.
58.
JudgeTALePineJARichBL (2006) Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology91(4): 762–776.
59.
KarkRShamirBChenG (2003) The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology88(2): 246–255.
60.
KonrathSBushmanBJCampbellWK (2006) Attenuating the link between threatened egotism and aggression. Psychological Science17(11): 995–1001.
61.
KuznetsovaABrockhoffPBChristensenRH (2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software82(13): 1–26.
62.
LamWLeeCTaylorMS, et al. (2018) Does proactive personality matter in leadership transitions? Effects of proactive personality on new leader identification and responses to new leaders and their change agendas. Academy of Management Journal61(1): 245–263.
63.
LearyMR (2007) Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology58: 317–344.
64.
LeBretonJMSenterJL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods11(4): 815–852.
65.
LittleTDCunninghamWAShaharG, et al. (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling9(2): 151–173.
66.
LiuDChenXPYaoX (2011) From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology96(2): 294–309.
67.
LiuDLiaoHLoiR (2012) The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal55(5): 1187–1212.
68.
LiuFLiPTarisTW, et al. (2022a) Creative performance pressure as a double-edged sword for creativity: The role of appraisals and resources. Human Resource Management61(6): 663–679.
69.
LiuXMaoJYZhengX, et al. (2022b) When and why narcissism leads to taking charge? The roles of coworker narcissism and employee comparative identity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology95(4): 758–787.
70.
LiuXZhengXLiN, et al. (2022c) Both a curse and a blessing? A social cognitive approach to the paradoxical effects of leader narcissism. Human Relations75(11): 2011–2038.
71.
LiuZZhouRWeiL, et al. (2021) How and when does leader narcissism hinder team radical creativity? The role of team information elaboration and inter-team competition. Chinese Management Studies17(1): 46–63.
72.
MaccobyM (2000) Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review78: 68–77.
73.
MaelFAshforthBE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior13(2): 103–123.
74.
MaoJYQuanJLiY, et al. (2021) The differential implications of employee narcissism for radical versus incremental creativity: A self-affirmation perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior42(7): 933–949.
75.
MarstandAFEpitropakiOMartinR (2018) Cross-lagged relations between perceived leader–employee value congruence and leader identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology91(2): 411–420.
76.
MarstandAFEpitropakiOvan KnippenbergD, et al. (2021) Leader and organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviors: Examining cross-lagged relationships and the moderating role of collective identity orientation. Human Relations74(10): 1716–1745.
77.
MartinsenØLArnulfJKFurnhamA, et al. (2019) Narcissism and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences142: 166–171.
78.
MattaFKScottBAKoopmanJ, et al. (2015) Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal58(6): 1686–1708.
79.
MillerJDLynamDRVizeC, et al. (2018) Vulnerable narcissism is (mostly) a disorder of neuroticism. Journal of Personality86(2): 186–199.
80.
MorfCCRhodewaltF (2001) Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry12(4): 177–196.
81.
MurphyKRMyorsB (1998) Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82.
NevickaBVan VianenAEMDe HooghAHB, et al. (2018) Narcissistic leaders: An asset or a liability? Leader visibility, follower responses, and group-level absenteeism. Journal of Applied Psychology103(7): 703–723.
83.
O’BoyleEHJrForsythDRBanksGC, et al. (2012) A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology97(3): 557–579.
84.
OldhamGRCummingsA (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal39(3): 607–634.
85.
OwensBPWallaceASWaldmanDA (2015) Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology100(4): 1203–1213.
86.
PaulhusDLWilliamsKM (2002) The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality36(6): 556–563.
87.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
88.
PreacherKJSeligJP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures6(2): 77–98.
89.
QuRJanssenOShiK (2015) Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations. Leadership Quarterly26(2): 286–299.
90.
RaskinRN (1980) Narcissism and creativity: Are they related?Psychological Reports46(1): 55–60.
SedikidesCCampbellWK (2017) Narcissistic force meets systemic resistance: The energy clash model. Perspectives on Psychological Science12(3): 400–421.
93.
ShanockLRBaranBEGentryWA, et al. (2010) Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology25(4): 543–554.
94.
SlussDMAshforthBE (2007) Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review32(1): 9–32.
95.
SmithGTMcCarthyDMAndersonKG (2000) On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment12(1): 102–111.
96.
SpainSMHarmsPDLeBretonJ (2014) The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35(S1): S41–S60.
97.
SuWLyuBChenH, et al. (2020) How does servant leadership influence employees’ service innovative behavior? The roles of intrinsic motivation and identification with the leader. Baltic Journal of Management15(4): 571–586.
98.
TierneyP (2008) Leadership and employee creativity. In: ZhouJShalleyCE (eds) Handbook of Organizational Creativity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 95–124.
99.
TwengeJMCampbellWK (2009) The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement. New York, NY: Free Press.
100.
TwengeJMCampbellSMHoffmanBJ, et al. (2010) Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management36(5): 1117–1142.
101.
Van der LindenSRosenthalSA (2016) Measuring narcissism with a single question? A replication and extension of the Single-Item Narcissism Scale (SINS). Personality and Individual Differences90: 238–241.
102.
Van KnippenbergDVan DickRTavaresS (2007) Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology37(3): 457–477.
103.
WallaceHMBaumeisterRF (2002) The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(5): 819–834.
104.
WangPRodeJC (2010) Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations63(8): 1105–1128.
105.
WangZXingLXuH, et al. (2021) Not all followers socially learn from ethical leaders: The roles of followers’ moral identity and leader identification in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics170(3): 449–469.
106.
WeeEXMLiaoHLiuD, et al. (2017) Moving from abuse to reconciliation: A power-dependence perspective on when and how a follower can break the spiral of abuse. Academy of Management Journal60(6): 2352–2380.
107.
WilliamsLJAndersonSE (1991) Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management17(3): 601–617.
108.
WilliamsLJVandenbergRJEdwardsJR (2009) Structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals3(1): 543–604.
109.
YangJChangMLiJ, et al. (2020) Exploring the moderated mediation relationship between leader narcissism and employees’ innovative behavior. Chinese Management Studies15(1): 137–154.
110.
ZhangXBartolKM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal53(1): 107–128.
111.
ZhangZWangMShiJ (2012) Leader–follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 111–130.
112.
ZhouJHoeverIJ (2014) Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior1(1): 333–359.
113.
ZhouJShalleyCE (2003) Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In: MartocchioJJFerrisGR (eds) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 22. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 165–217.
114.
ZhouLLiJLiuY, et al. (2019) Exploring the relationship between leader narcissism and team creativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal40(8): 916–931.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
