It is of growing concern that supervisors sometimes engage in destructive leadership behavior to undermine their subordinates, which exacts a psychological toll on these employees. How can employees mitigate and overcome the adverse psychological effects of supervisor undermining? Invoking theories of personal agency and social competencies, this study addresses this important question by examining the effectiveness of employee voice in buffering the adverse effects of supervisor undermining on employee work-related well-being and turnover intention. Through a three-wave field study, we found that voice plays a buffering role in the relationship between supervisor undermining and these outcome variables only when employees possess high levels of political skill (i.e., three-way interactions), and that this buffering effect is realized through mitigating the adverse effects of supervisor undermining on employee psychological empowerment. In contrast, when employees possess low levels of political skill, engaging in high levels of voice exacerbates the detrimental effects of supervisor undermining on employee psychological empowerment, and subsequently decreases employee work-related well-being and heightens employee turnover intention. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings are discussed.
AhearnKKFerrisGRHochwarterWA, et al. (2004) Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management30(3): 309–327.
2.
AquinoKThauS (2009) Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology60: 717–741.
3.
AshforthBE (1989) The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes43(2): 207–242.
4.
BanduraA (1997) Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BlickleGKramerJSchneiderPB, et al. (2011) Role of political skill in job performance prediction beyond general mental ability and personality in cross-sectional and predictive studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology41(2): 488–514.
6.
BliesePDHangesPJ (2004) Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods7(4): 400–417.
7.
BoniolMMcIsaacMXuL, et al. (2019) Gender equity in the health workforce: Analysis of 104 countries. Working paper 1. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO/HIS/HWF/Gender/WP1/2019.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
8.
BrislinRW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: TriandisHCBerryJW (eds) Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 349–444.
9.
BurrisER (2012) The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal55(4): 851–875.
10.
CammannCFichmanMJenkinsD, et al. (1983) Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In: SeashoreSELawlerEEMirvisPH, et al. (eds) Assessing Organizational Change. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 71–138.
11.
CohenJCohenPWestSG, et al. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12.
CongerJAKanungoRN (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review13(3): 471–482.
13.
DetertJRBurrisER (2007) Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?Academy of Management Journal50(4): 869–884.
14.
DetertJRTreviñoLK (2010) Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science21(1): 249–270.
15.
DuffyMKGansterDCPagonM (2002) Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal45(2): 331–351.
16.
DuttonJEAshfordSJ (1993) Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review18(3): 397–428.
17.
EllenIIIBP (2014) Considering the positive possibilities of leader political behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior35(6): 892–896.
18.
EvansMG (1985) A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes36(3): 305–323.
19.
EwenCWihlerAFriederRE, et al. (2014) Leader advancement motive, political skill, leader behavior, and effectiveness: A moderated mediation extension of socioanalytic theory. Human Performance27(5): 373–392.
20.
FerrisGRTreadwayDCKolodinskyRW, et al. (2005) Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management31(1): 126–152.
21.
FerrisGRTreadwayDCPerrewéPL, et al. (2007) Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management33(3): 290–320.
22.
FerrisGRBlickleGSchneiderPB, et al. (2008) Political skill construct and criterion-related validation: A two-study investigation. Journal of Managerial Psychology23: 744–771.
23.
FerrisGRDavidsonSLPerrewéPL (2011) Political Skill at Work: Impact on Work Effectiveness. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey.
24.
FerrisGREllenBPMcAllisterCP, et al. (2019) Reorganizing organizational politics research: A review of the literature and identification of future research directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior6: 299–323.
25.
FolgerRCropanzanoR (1998) Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
FriederREFerrisGRPerrewéPL, et al. (2019) Extending the metatheoretical framework of social/political influence to leadership: Political skill effects on situational appraisals, responses, and evaluations by others. Personnel Psychology72(4): 543–569.
27.
GagnéMSenecalCBKoestnerR (1997) Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation, a multidimensional model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology28(14): 1222–1240.
28.
GardnerRGHarrisTBLiN, et al. (2017) Understanding “it depends” in organizational research: A theory-based taxonomy, review, and future research agenda concerning interactive and quadratic relationships. Organizational Research Methods20(4): 610–638.
29.
GrantAM (2013) Rocking the boat but keeping it steady: The role of emotion regulation in employee voice. Academy of Management Journal56(6): 1703–1723.
30.
GrantAMAshfordSJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior28: 3–34.
31.
GreenbaumRLMawritzMBMayerDM, et al. (2013) To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employee reactions to supervisor abuse of customers and the moderating role of employee moral identity. Human Relations66(7): 925–950.
32.
HarrisKJKacmarKMZivnuskaS, et al. (2007) The impact of political skill on impression management effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology92(1): 278–285.
33.
HarrisKJWheelerARKacmarKM (2009) Leader–member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. The Leadership Quarterly20(3): 371–382.
34.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
HomPWLeeTWShawJD, et al. (2017) One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology102(3): 530–545.
36.
HowellTMHarrisonDABurrisER, et al. (2015) Who gets credit for input? Demographic and structural status cues in voice recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology100(6): 1765–1784.
37.
JavidanMDorfmanPWDe LuqueMS, et al. (2006) In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives20(1): 67–90.
38.
JudgeTAKlingerR (2008) Job satisfaction, Subjective well-being at work. In: EidMLarsenR (eds) The Science of Subjective Well-being. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, 393–413.
39.
Kammeyer-MuellerJWanbergCRubensteinA, et al. (2013) Support, undermining, and newcomer socialization: Fitting in during the first 90 days. Academy of Management Journal56(4): 1104–1124.
40.
KlaasBSOlson-BuchananJBWardAK (2012) The determinants of alternative forms of workplace voice: An integrative perspective. Journal of Management38(1): 314–345.
41.
KrasikovaDVGreenSGLeBretonJM (2013) Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management39(5): 1308–1338.
42.
LamCFLeeCSuiY (2018) Say it as it is: Consequences of voice directness, voice politeness, and voicer credibility on voice endorsement. Journal of Applied Psychology104: 642–658.
43.
LeeSYWhitfordAB (2008) Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18(4): 647–671.
44.
LianHFerrisDLBrownDJ (2012) Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes117(1): 41–52.
45.
LyuDJiLZhengQ, et al. (2019) Abusive supervision and turnover intention: Mediating effects of psychological empowerment of nurses. International Journal of Nursing Sciences6(2): 198–203.
46.
MackeyJDMcAllisterCPMaherLP, et al. (2019) Leaders and followers behaving badly: A meta-analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors. Personnel Psychology72(1): 3–47.
47.
MaynardMTGilsonLLMathieuJE (2012) Empowerment-fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management38(4): 1231–1281.
48.
McAllisterCPEllenIIIBPPerrewéPL, et al. (2015) Checkmate: Using political skill to recognize and capitalize on opportunities in the ‘game’ of organizational life. Business Horizons58(1): 25–34.
49.
McAllisterCPEllenIIIBPFerrisGR (2018) Social influence opportunity recognition, evaluation, and capitalization: Increased theoretical specification through political skill’s dimensional dynamics. Journal of Management44(5): 1926–1952.
50.
MintzbergH (1983) Power In and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
51.
MitchellMSAmbroseML (2007) Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 1159–1168.
52.
MitchellMSAmbroseML (2012) Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology97(6): 1148–1170.
53.
Morgan-LopezAAMacKinnonDP (2006) Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation. Behavior Research Methods38(1): 77–87.
54.
MorrisonEW (2014) Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior1: 173–197.
55.
MorrisonEWMillikenFJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review25(4): 706–725.
56.
MunyonTPSummersJKThompsonKM, et al. (2015) Political skill and work outcomes: A theoretical extension, meta-analytic investigation, and agenda for the future. Personnel Psychology68(1): 143–184.
57.
Nahum-ShaniIHendersonMMLimS, et al. (2014) Supervisor support: Does supervisor support buffer or exacerbate the adverse effects of supervisor undermining?Journal of Applied Psychology99(3): 484–503.
58.
O’DonoghueAConwayEBosakJ (2016) Abusive supervision, employee well-being and ill-being: The moderating role of core self-evaluations. In: AshkanasyNMHärtelCEJZerbeWJ (eds) Emotions and Organizational Governance. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 3–34.
59.
PerrewéPLFerrisGRFrinkDD, et al. (2000) Political skill: An antidote for workplace stressors. Academy of Management Perspectives14(3): 115–123.
60.
PinderCCHarlosKP (2001) Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management20: 331–370.
61.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
62.
PreacherKJZyphurMJZhangZ (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods15(3): 209–233.
63.
QuiñonesMVan den BroeckADe WitteH (2013) Do job resources affect work engagement via psychological empowerment? A mediation analysis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology29(3): 127–134.
64.
SchatACFroneMRKellowayEK (2006) Prevalence of workplace aggression in the US workforce: Findings from a national study. In: KellowayEKBarlingJHurrell JrJJ (eds) Handbook of Workplace Violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 47–89.
65.
SchaufeliWBBakkerAB (2003) Test manual for the Utrecht work engagement scale. Unpublished manuscript. Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Available at: http://www.schaufeli.com (accessed 30 January 2020).
66.
SchaufeliWBTarisTWVan RhenenW (2008) Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?Applied Psychology57(2): 173–203.
67.
SchynsBSchillingJ (2013) How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly24(1): 138–158.
68.
SeibertSEWangGCourtrightSH (2011) Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations, a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology96(5): 981–1003.
69.
SeligmanME (1972) Learned helplessness. Annual Review of Medicine23: 407–412.
70.
SherfENParkeMRIsaakyanS (2020) Distinguishing voice and silence at work: Unique relationships with perceived impact, psychological safety, and burnout. Academy of Management Journal. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1428 (accessed 24 July 2020).
71.
ShnabelNNadlerA (2008) A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential needs of victim and perpetrator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94(1): 116–132.
72.
SiemsenERothAOliveiraP (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods13(3): 456–476.
73.
SmithANBaskerville-WatkinsMBurkeMJ, et al. (2013) Gendered influence: A gender-role perspective on the use and effectiveness of influence tactics. Journal of Management39(5): 1156–1183.
74.
SpectorPE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods9(2): 221–232.
75.
SpreitzerGM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal38(5): 1442–1465.
76.
SpreitzerGM (1996) Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal39: 483–504.
77.
SpreitzerGMMishraAK (2002) To stay or to go: Voluntary survivor turnover following organizational downsizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(6): 707–729.
SuttonRI (2017) The Asshole Survival Guide: How To Deal With People Who Treat You Like Dirt. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
80.
TangiralaSRamanujamR (2008) Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal51(6): 1189–1203.
81.
TepperBJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal43(2): 178–190.
82.
TepperBJAlmedaM (2012) Negative exchanges with supervisors. In: de Tournes EbyLTAllenTD (eds) Personal Relationships: The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-being. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 67–94.
83.
TepperBJDuffyMKShawJD (2001) Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology86(5): 974–983.
84.
TepperBJMossSELockhartDE, et al. (2007) Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal50(5): 1169–1180.
85.
TepperBJMitchellMSHaggardDL, et al. (2015) On the exchange of hostility with supervisors: An examination of self-enhancing and self-defeating perspectives. Personnel Psychology68(4): 723–758.
86.
TepperBJSimonLParkHM (2017) Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4: 123–152.
87.
TettRPMeyerJP (1993) Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover, path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology46(2): 259–293.
88.
TofighiDMacKinnonDP (2011) RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods43(3): 692–700.
89.
TofighiDMacKinnonDP (2016) Monte Carlo confidence intervals for complex functions of indirect effects. Structural Equation Modeling23(2): 194–205.
90.
TreadwayDCHochwarterWAKacmarCJ, et al. (2005) Political will, political skill, and political behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior26(3): 229–245.
91.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020) Household data, annual averages: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Washington, DC: US BLS. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm (accessed 24 July 2020).
92.
Van DyneLLePineJA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal41(1): 108–119.
93.
Van DyneLAngSBoteroIC (2003) Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies40(6): 1359–1392.
94.
VinokurADPriceRHCaplanRD (1996) Hard times and hurtful partners: How financial strain affects depression and relationship satisfaction of unemployed persons and their spouses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(1): 166–179.
95.
WihlerABlickleGEllenBPIII, et al. (2017) Personal initiative and job performance evaluations: Role of political skill in opportunity recognition and capitalization. Journal of Management43(5): 1388–1420.
96.
WittLA (1998) Enhancing organizational goal congruence: A solution to organizational politics. Journal of Applied Psychology83(4): 666–674.
97.
XanthopoulouDBakkerABDollardMF, et al. (2007) When do job demands particularly predict burnout? The moderating role of job resources. Journal of Managerial Psychology22(8): 766–786.
98.
YangJSHaoDJ (2018) Dilemmas for nurses in China. The Lancet392(10141): 30.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
