The authors examine cross-cultural differences in the effects of gender diversity on group identification and performance using workgroups from American and Chinese firms. Nationality is found to moderate the relationship between gender diversity and group identification in that gender diversity associates more positively with group identification in Chinese workgroups than in American workgroups. Nationality does not moderate the gender diversity–group performance relationship: although the Chinese sample shows a positive association between gender diversity and group performance, the American sample shows no association. A second longitudinal study explores the mechanisms of relationship conflict and task conflict by which gender diversity benefits group performance in China. Results show that gender-diverse groups perform better than homogeneous groups by decreasing relationship conflict and task conflict. Future research directions and practical implications are discussed.
AliMKulikCTMetzI (2009) The impact of gender diversity on performance in services and manufacturing organizations. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.
2.
AshforthBEMaelFA (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
3.
AshkanasyNMHärtelCEJDausCS (2002) Diversity and emotion: The new frontiers in organizational behavior research. Journal of Management28(3): 307–338.
4.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
5.
BarrickMRStewartGLNeubertMMountMK (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology83(3): 377–391.
6.
BondMHHewstoneM (1988) Social identity theory and the perception of intergroup relations in Hong Kong. International Journal of Intercultural Relations12(2): 153–170.
7.
BrewerMBBrownRJ (1998) Intergroup relations. In: GilbertDTFiskeST (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 554–594.
8.
BrewerMBMillerN (1996) Intergroup Relations. Buckingham: Open University Press.
9.
BrewerMBYukiM (2007) Culture and social identity. In: KitayamaSCohenD (eds) Handbook of Cultural Psychology. New York: Guilford Press, 307–322.
10.
BrislinRW (1981) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: TriandisHCBerryJW (eds) Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 389–444.
11.
CarnevalePJProbstTM. (1998) Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(5): 1300–1309.
12.
ChattopadhyayPGeorgeELawrenceS (2004) Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. Journal of Applied Psychology89(5): 892–900.
CheungMLeungKAuK (2006) Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology37(5): 522–541.
15.
ChiaRCMooreJLLamKNChuangCJChengBS (1994) Cultural differences in gender role attitudes between Chinese and American students. Sex Roles31(1–2): 23–30.
16.
DawsonJF (2003) Do we have enough? The accuracy of incomplete data from small groups. Best paper proceedings of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
17.
De DreuCKWWeingartLR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology88(4): 741–749.
18.
De WitFGreerLL (2008) The black-box deciphered: A meta-analysis of diversity conflict and team performance. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Anaheim, CA.
19.
DillmanDA (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd edn.New York: Wiley.
20.
DoosjeBEllemersNSpearsR (1995) Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology31(5): 410–436.
21.
EaglyA (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
EarleyPCLeeCHansonLA (1990) Joint moderating effects of job experience and task component complexity: Relations among goal setting task strategies and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior11(1): 3–15.
23.
FarhJLEarleyPCLinSC (1997) Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly42(3): 421–444.
24.
FeiXT (1948/2007) Rural China. JiangSu: Jiangsuwenyi (in Chinese).
25.
FriedmanRChiSCLiuLA (2006) An expectancy model of Chinese-American differences in conflict-avoiding. Journal of International Business Studies37(1): 76–97.
26.
GiambatistaRCBhappuA (2010) Diversity’s harvest: Interactions of diversity sources and communication technology on creativity group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes111(2): 116–126.
27.
GutekBACohenAG (1987) Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men’s and women’s experiences. Human Relations40(2): 97–115.
28.
HarrisonDAKleinKJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation variety or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1199–1228.
29.
HempelPSZhangZXTjosvoldD (2009) Conflict management between and within teams for developing trusting relationships in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior30(1): 41–65.
30.
JacksonSEJoshiAErhardtNL (2003) Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management29(6): 801–830.
31.
JehnKA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly40(2): 256–282.
32.
JehnKAMannixEA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intra group conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal44(2): 238–251.
33.
JoshiARohH (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal52(3): 599–627.
34.
JostJTKayAC (2005) Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88(3): 498–509.
35.
LeungKKochPTLuL (2002) A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management19(2–3): 201–220.
36.
LiJTHambrickDC (2005) Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines conflict and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal48(5): 794–813.
37.
MarkusHKitayamaS (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition emotion and motivation. Psychological Review98(2): 224–253.
38.
MillerGT (1984) Self-schemas, gender, and social comparison: A clarification of the related attributes hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(6): 1222–1229.
39.
MohammedSAngellLC (2004) Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior25(8): 1015–1039.
40.
MorrisMWWilliamsKYKwokLLarrickRMendozaMTBhatnagarD. (1998) Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differences. Journal of International Business Studies29(4): 729–747.
41.
MyaskovskyLUnikelEDewMA (2005) Effects of gender diversity on performance and interpersonal behavior in small work groups. Sex Roles52(9–10): 645–657.
42.
PelledLHEisenhardtKMXinKR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly44(1): 1–28.
43.
PettigrewTF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49(1): 65–85.
44.
RidgewayCLSmith-LovinL (1999) The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology25: 191–216.
45.
RogelbergSGRumerySM (1996) Gender diversity, team decision quality, time on task, and interpersonal cohesion. Small Group Research27(1): 79–90.
46.
TeachmanJD (1980) Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods and Research8(3): 341–362.
47.
TjosvoldDSunHF (2003) Openness among Chinese in conflict: Effects of direct discussion and warmth on integrative decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology33(9): 1878–1897.
48.
TjosvoldDLawKSunHF (2006) Effectiveness of Chinese teams: The role of conflict types and conflict management approaches. Management and Organization Review2(2): 231–252.
49.
TsuiASGutekBA (1999) Demographic Differences in Organizations, Current Research and Future Directions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
50.
TsuiASEganTDO’ReillyCA (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly37(4): 549–579.
51.
van DickRvan KnippenbergDHageleSGuillaumeYRFBrodbeckFC (2008) Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations61(10): 1463–1492.
52.
van KnippenbergD (2000) Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review49(3): 357–371.
53.
van KnippenbergDEllemersN (2003) Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to group-oriented efforts. In: HaslamSAvan KnippenbergDPlatowMJEllemersN (eds) Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice. New York and Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 29–42.
54.
van KnippenbergDSchippersMC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual of Review of Psychology58: 515–541.
55.
Van KnippenbergDde DreuCKWHomanAC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology89(6): 1008–1022.
56.
WeggeJRothCNeubachBSchmidtKHKanferR (2008) Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology93(6): 1301–1313.
57.
WitheyMJDaftRLCooperWH (1983) Measures of Perrow’s work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale. Academy of Management Journal26(1): 45–63.
58.
WoodW (1987) Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. Psychological Bulletin102(1): 53–71.
59.
YangKK (2001) Beyond Maslow’s culture-bound linear theory: A preliminary statement of the double Y model of basic human needs In: Murphy-BermanVBermanJJ (eds) Cross Cultural Differences in Perspectives on the Self, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 49. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 175–255.
60.
YukiM (2003) Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural context. Social Psychology Quarterly66(2): 166–183.
61.
ZhangJNorvilitisJMJinSH (2001) Measuring gender orientation with the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Chinese culture. Sex Role44(3–4): 237–251.
