Project teams are regularly assembled by a variety of organizations in order to perform knowledge-intensive tasks. Previous shared experiences among their members can have a significant impact on team performance. In this study, we use a unique and detailed dataset of 6206 cardiac surgeries from a private hospital in Europe, property of an American non-profit organization, in order to examine how past shared experiences of individuals affect future team productivity. Using transactive memory system as theoretical framework, we first decompose overall team familiarity into horizontal familiarity (e.g. surgeon to surgeon) and hierarchical familiarity (e.g. surgeon to nurse) and find that the former one is more beneficial for team productivity than the latter one. Next, we observe that horizontal familiarity of high-power, high-status individuals has a higher impact on team productivity than the one among subordinate individuals. Finally, we investigate how past failure experiences of individuals in the same team can increase future team productivity more than past shared successes. Our results provide useful insights for managers who aim to increase team productivity via better team allocation strategies.
AikenLHClarkeSPCheungRBSloaneDMSilberJH (2003) Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association290(12): 1617–1623.
2.
AikenLHClarkeSPSloaneDM, et al. (2002) Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association288(16): 1987–1993.
AvgerinosEGokpinarB (2017) Team familiarity and productivity in cardiac surgery operations: The effect of dispersion bottlenecks and task complexity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management19(1): 19–35.
5.
AvgerinosEGokpinarB (2018) Task variety in professional service work: When it helps and when it hurts. Production and Operations Management27(7): 1368–1389.
6.
BanksGCBatchelorJHSeerAO’BoyleJrPollackJMGowerK (2014) What does team-member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior35(2): 273–295.
7.
BarrickMBBradleyBHKristof-BrownALColbertAE (2007) The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal50(3): 544–557.
8.
BaumJACDahlinKB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organization Science18(3): 368–385.
9.
BrandonDPHollingsheadAB (2004) Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science15(6): 633–644.
10.
BreuschTSPaganAR (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society47(5): 1287–1294.
11.
CannonMDEdmondsonAC (2001) Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior22(2): 161–177.
12.
CannonMDEdmondsonAC (2005) Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning38(3): 299–319.
13.
CartheyJde LevalMRWrightDJFarewellVTReasonJTand all UK paediatric cardiac centres (2003) Behavioural markers of surgical excellence. Safety Science41(5): 409–425.
14.
ChillemiOGuiB (1997) Team human capital and worker mobility. Journal of Labor Economics15(4): 567–585.
15.
CoburnD (1992) Friedson then and now: An ‘internalist’ critique of Friedson’s past and present views of the medical profession. International Journal of Health Services22(3): 497–512.
16.
CyertRMMarchJG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
DaviesJM (2001) Medical applications of CRM. In: SalasEEdensEBowersC (ed.) Improving Teamwork in Organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 265–282.
18.
DaviesJM (2005) Team communication in the operating room. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica49(7): 898–901.
19.
DeChurchLMesmer-MagnusJ (2010a) The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology95(1): 32–53.
20.
DeChurchLMesmer-MagnusJ (2010b) Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice14(1): 1–14.
21.
DeSantisG (1980) Realms of expertise: A view from within the medical profession. In: RothJA (ed.) Research in the Sociology of Health. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 179–236.
22.
DingwallRW (1974) Some sociological aspects of ‘nursing research’. The Sociological Review22(1): 45–55.
23.
DriskellJESalasE (1991) Group decision making under stress. Journal of Applied Psychology76(3): 473–478.
24.
DruckmanDSwetsJA (1988) Enhancing Human Performance: Issues Theories and Techniques. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25.
EdmondsonAC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 350–383.
26.
EdmondsonAC (2003a) Framing for learning: Lessons in successful technology implementation. California Management Review45(2): 34–54.
27.
EdmondsonAC (2003b) Speaking up in operating room: How team leaders promote learn interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies40(6): 1419–1452.
28.
EdmondsonAC (2004) Learning from failure in healthcare: Frequent opportunities pervasive barriers. British Medical Journal Quality and Safety13(Suppl. 2): ii3–ii9.
29.
EdmondsonACBohmerRMPisanoGP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly46(4): 685–716.
30.
EdmondsonACWinslowABBohmerRMJPisanoGP (2003) Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sciences34(2): 197–224.
31.
EspinosaJASlaughterSAKrautREHerbslebJD (2007) Familiarity complexity and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science18(4): 613–630.
32.
EvansCRDionKL (1991) Group cohesion and performance a meta-analysis. Small Group Research22(2): 175–186.
33.
FarajSSproullL (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science46(12): 1554–1568.
FousheeHCHelmreichRL (1988) Group interaction and flight crew performance. In: WienerELNagelDC (eds) Human Factors in Aviation. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing, 189–227.
36.
FriedsonE (1970) The Profession of Medicine. New York: Dodd, Mead, and Co.
37.
FuchsV (1974) Who Shall Live? Health Economics and Social Choice. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
38.
GaynesRPCulverDHHoranTCEdwardsJRRichardsCTolsonJS and The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (2001) Surgical site infections (SSI): Rates in the United States 1992–1998: The national nosocomial infections surveillance system basic SSI risk index. Clinical Infectious Diseases33(Suppl. 2): 69–77.
39.
GibbonsCBruceJCarpenterJ, et al. (2011) Identifications of risk factors by systematic review and development of risk-adjusted models for surgical site infection. Health Technological Assessment15(30): 1–56.
40.
GibsonCB (2017) Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed methods research. Organizational Research Methods20(2): 193–223.
41.
GinoFPisanoGP (2011) Why leaders don’t learn from success. Harvard Business Review89(4): 68–74.
42.
GladsteinDL (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly29(4): 499–517.
43.
GoyalR (2013) Surgeons and anesthesiologists: Need to communicate?Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology29(3): 297–298.
44.
GroysbergBPolzerJTElfenbeinHA (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science22(3): 722–737.
45.
GullySMDevineDJWhitneyDJ (1995) A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research26(4): 497–520.
46.
HackmanJR (1987) The design of work teams. In: LorschJW (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 315–342.
47.
HackmanJR (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
48.
HaffertyFWWolinskyFD (1991) Conflicting characterizations of professional dominance. In: LevyJ (ed.) Current Research on Occupations and Professions. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 225–249.
49.
HambrickDC (1994) Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. In: StawBMCummingsLL (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 171–214.
50.
HarrisonDAMohammedSMcGrathJE, et al. (2003) Time matters in team performance: Effect of member familiarity entrainment and task continuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology56(3): 633–669.
51.
HelmreichRLSchaeferHG (1994) Team performance in the operating room. In: BognerMS (eds) Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 225–253.
52.
HollenbeckJBeersmaBSchoutenM (2012) Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review37(1): 82–106.
53.
HollenbeckJRIlgenDRLepineJA, et al. (1998) Extending the multilevel theory of team decision making: Effects of feedback and experience in hierarchical teams. Academy of Management Journal41(3): 269–282.
54.
HollenbeckJRIlgenDRSegoDJ, et al. (1995) Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology80(2): 292–316.
55.
HollingsheadAB (1998) Communication learning and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology34(5): 423–442.
56.
HollingsheadAB (2001) Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(6): 1080–1089.
57.
HollingsheadABBrandonDP (2003) Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research29(4): 607–615.
58.
HollingsheadABFraidinSN (2003) Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology39(4): 355–363.
59.
HornBWalkerRW (2008) The Military Leadership Handbook. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
60.
HuberPLewisK (2010) Cross-understanding: Implications for group cognition and performance. The Academy of Management Review35(1): 6–26.
61.
HuckmanRS (2003) The utilization of competing technologies within the firm: Evidence from cardiac procedures. Management Science49(5): 599–617.
62.
HuckmanRSStaatsBR (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management13(3): 310–328.
63.
HuckmanRSStaatsBR (2013) The hidden benefits of keeping teams intact. Harvard Business Review91(12): 27–29.
64.
HuckmanRSStaatsBRUptonDM (2009) Team familiarity role experience and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Science55(1): 85–100.
65.
JoshiARohH (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal52(3): 599–627.
66.
KCDSStaatsBR (2012) Accumulating a portfolio of experience: The effect of focal and related experience on surgeon performance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management14(4): 618–633.
67.
KCDSTerwieschC (2011) The effects of focus on performance: Evidence from California hospitals. Management Science57(11): 1897–1912.
68.
KCDSStaatsBRGinoF (2013) Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Science59(11): 2435–2449.
LewisK (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology88(4): 587–604.
76.
LewisK (2004) Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science50(11): 1519–1533.
77.
LewisKHerndonB (2011) Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science22(5): 1254–1265.
78.
LiangDWMorelandRLArgoteL (1995) Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21(4): 384–393.
79.
LingardLEspinSWhyteS, et al. (2004) Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality & Safety in Health Care13(5): 330–334.
80.
LingardLReznickREspinS, et al. (2002) Team communications in the operating room. Academic Medicine77(3): 232–237.
81.
LingardLWhyteSEspinS, et al. (2006) Towards safer interprofessional communication: Constructing a model of ‘utility’ from preoperative team briefings. Journal of Interprofessional Care20(5): 471–483.
MadhavanSChanSPTanWC, et al. (2018) Cardiopulmonary bypass time: Every minute counts. The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery59(2): 274–281.
84.
MageeJGalinskyA (2008) The self-reinforcing nature of social hierarchy: Origins and consequences of power and status. Paper presented at IACM 21st Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
85.
MarksMAMathieuJEZaccaroSJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review26(3): 356–376.
86.
Mesmer-MagnusJRDeChurchLA (2009) Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology94(2): 535–546.
87.
MirandaSMSaundersC (2003) The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research14(1): 87–106.
88.
MitchellLFlinR (2008) Non-technical skills of the operating theatre scrub nurse: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing63(1): 15–24.
89.
MorelandRLArgoteLKrishnanR (1996) Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In: NyeJLBrowerAM (eds) What’s So Social about Social Cognition? Social Cognition Research in Small Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 57–84.
90.
MullenBCopperC (1994) The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin115(2): 210–227.
91.
NembhardIMEdmondsonAC (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(7): 941–966.
92.
NikolovaSHarrisonMSuttonM (2016) The impact of waiting time on health gains from surgery: Evidence from a national patient-reported outcome dataset. Health Economics25(8): 955–968.
93.
PalazzoloET (2005) Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems. Communication Research32(6): 726–761.
94.
PearsallMJEllisAPJBellBS (2010) Building the infrastructure: The effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology95(1): 192–200.
95.
PisanoGPBohmerRMEdmondsonAC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Science47(6): 752–768.
96.
PrenticeJCPizerSD (2007) Delayed access to health care and mortality. Health Services Research42(2): 644–662.
97.
PwC Saratoga (2012/2013) US human capital effectiveness report: State of the workforce. Available at: www.pwc.com/saratoga (accessed 10 July 2019).
98.
RafterNHickeyACondellS, et al. (2014) Adverse events in healthcare: Learning from mistakes. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine108(4): 273–277.
99.
RamdasKSalehKSternSLiuxH (2017) Variety and experience: Learning and forgetting in the use of surgical devices. Management Science64(6): 2590–2608.
100.
ReagansRArgoteLBrooksD (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science51(6): 869–881.
101.
RenYArgoteL (2017) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions. Antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Journal5(1): 189–229.
102.
RoachGWKanchugerMManganoCM, et al. (1996) Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. New England Journal of Medicine335(25): 1857–1863.
103.
RoquesFMichelPGoldstoneARNashefSA (2003) The logistic EuroSCORE. European Heart Journal24(9): 882–883.
104.
RulkeDLRauD (2000) Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training. Group & Organization Management25(4): 373–396.
105.
RydenfaltCJohanssonGOdenrickP, et al. (2015) Distributed leadership in the operating room: A naturalistic observational study. Cognition, Technology & Work17(3): 451–460.
106.
SalasEGranadosDDWeaverSJKingH (2008) Does team training work? Principles for health care. Academic Emergency Medicine15(11): 1002–1009.
107.
SchmittM (1990) Medical malpractice and interdisciplinary team dynamics. Proceeding of the 12th Annual Interdisciplinary Health Care Team Conference. Indiana: Indiana University, 53–66.
108.
SextonJBThomsEJHelmreichRL (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: Cross sectional surveys. British Medical Journal320(7237): 745–749.
109.
ShortellSM (1974) Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. Social Science and Medicine8(1): 1–9.
110.
SingerSJMolinaGLiZ, et al. (2016) Relationship between operating room teamwork contextual factors and safety checklist performance. Journal of the American College of Surgeons223(4): 568–580.
111.
SitkinSB (1992) Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. In: CummingsLLStawBM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior Vol. 14. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 231–266.
112.
StaatsBR (2012) Unpacking team familiarity: The effects of geographic location and hierarchical role. Production and Operations Management21(3): 619–635.
113.
StawBMSandelandsLEDuttonJE (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly26(4): 501–524.
114.
TanSBPenaGAltreeMMaddernGJ (2014) Multidisciplinary team simulation for the operating theatre: A review of the literature. ANZ Journal of Surgery84(7-8): 515–522.
115.
TuckerALEdmondsonAC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review45(2): 55–72.
116.
TurnerJCHoggMATurnerPJSmithPM (1984) Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology23(2): 97–111.
117.
VashdiDRBambergerPAErezM (2013) Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal56(4): 945–971.
118.
WagnerJA (1995) Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal38(1): 152–172.
119.
WahrJAPragerRLAbernathyJ, et al. (2013) Patient safety in the cardiac operating room: Human factors and teamwork: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation128(10): 1139–1169.
120.
WaubenLSGLDekker-van DoornCMvan WijngaardenJDH, et al. (2011) Discrepant perceptions of communication, teamwork and situation awareness among surgical team members. International Journal for Quality in Health Care23(2): 159–166.
121.
WegnerDM (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: MullenGGoethalsG (eds) Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 185–208.
122.
WegnerDM (1995) A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition13(3): 319–339.
123.
WegnerDMGiulianoTHertelPT (1985) Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In: IckesW (ed.) Compatible and Incompatible Relationships. New York: Springer-Verlag, 253–276.
124.
WeickKERobertsKH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 357–381.
125.
WolinskyFD (1988) The professional dominance perspective revisited. The Milbank Quarterly66(2): 33–47.
126.
YuleSFlinRMaranN, et al. (2008) Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: Reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery32(4): 548–556.
127.
ZhangZXHempelPSHanYLTjosvoldD (2007) Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology92(6): 1722–1730.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
