Does working from home on a given day complicate or rather facilitate combining work and home roles that day, why and for whom? To answer these questions, we examined how a teleworking day affects daily work-to-home conflict and daily home-to-work conflict. Based on boundary theory, we expected these relationships to be mediated by daily role transitions and moderated by employees’ preferences to protect their home(/work) domain from work(/home) interruptions. Hypotheses were tested through multilevel moderated mediation modeling using diary data collected during 14 consecutive workdays with 81 employees (N = 678 data points). In line with our expectations, employees were found to make more work-to-home transitions (i.e. interruptions of work activities to deal with home demands during work hours) on teleworking days, which was related to lower work-to-home conflict but higher home-to-work conflict on these days. They also made more home-to-work transitions (i.e. interruptions of home activities to deal with work demands after hours) on teleworking days, which was related to more work-to-home conflict on these days. The latter effect was stronger for employees with a home protection preference. There was no moderating impact of work protection preference. Overall, employees experienced less work-to-home conflict but more home-to-work conflict on teleworking days compared to non-teleworking days.
AguinisHGottfredsonRCulpepperA (2013) Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management39(6): 1490–1528.
2.
AllenDRennRGriffethR (2003) The impact of telecommuting design on social systems, self-regulation, and role boundaries. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management22: 125–164.
3.
AllenTGoldenTShockleyK (2015) How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest16(2): 40–68.
4.
AllenTHerstDBruckCSuttonM (2000) Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology5(2): 278–308.
5.
AshforthBKreinerGFugateM (2000) All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review25(3): 472–491.
6.
BaileyDKurlandN (2002) A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(4): 383–400.
7.
BauerDPreacherKGilK (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods11(2): 142–163.
8.
BollenKBauldryS (2011) Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods16(3): 265–284.
9.
ButtsMCasperWYangT (2013) How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology98(1): 1–25.
10.
ByronK (2005) A meta-analytic review of work-home conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior67(2): 169–198.
11.
CarlsonDKacmarKWilliamsL (2000) Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-home conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior56(2): 249–276.
12.
CarlsonDKacmarKZivnuskaSFergusonM (2015) Do the benefits of home-to-work transitions come at too great a cost?Journal of Occupational Health Psychology20(2): 161–171.
13.
CasperWEbyLBordeauxCLockwoodALambertD (2007) A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research. Journal of Applied Psychology92(1): 28–43.
14.
DemeroutiERispensS (2014) Improving the image of student-recruited samples: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology87(1): 34–41.
15.
DemeroutiEDerksDLiekeLBakkerA (2014) New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work–family balance, and well-being. In: KorunkaCHoonakkerP (eds) The Impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life. Dordrecht: Springer, 123–141.
16.
DerksDBakkerAPetersPvan WingerdenP (2016) Work-related smartphone use, work-family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations69(5): 1045–1068.
17.
DuxburyLHigginsCMillsS (1992) After-hours telecommuting and work-family conflict: A comparative analysis. Information Systems Research3(2): 173–190.
18.
EdwardsJRothbardN (1999) Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes77(2): 85–129.
19.
FeldmanDGaineyT (1997) Patterns of telecommuting and their consequences: Framing the research agenda. Human Resource Management Review7(4): 369–388.
20.
FonnerKStacheL (2012) All in a day’s work, at home: Teleworkers’ management of micro role transitions and the work–home boundary. New Technology, Work and Employment27(3): 242–257.
21.
GadeyneNVerbruggenMDelanoeijeJDe CoomanR (2018) All wired, all tired? Work-related ICT-use outside work hours and work-to-home conflict: The role of integration preference, integration norms and work demands. Journal of Vocational Behavior107: 86–99.
22.
GajendranRHarrisonD (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: A meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology92(6): 1524–1541.
23.
GlavinPSchiemanSReidS (2011) Boundary-spanning work demands and their consequences for guilt and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior52(1): 43–57.
24.
GilmourAThompsonRCullisB (1995) Average information REML: An efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics51(4): 1440–1450.
25.
GoldenT (2012) Altering the effects of work and family conflict on exhaustion: Telework during traditional and nontraditional work hours. Journal of Business and Psychology27(3): 255–269.
26.
GoldenTVeigaJSimsekZ (2006) Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-home conflict: Is there no place like home?Journal of Applied Psychology91(6): 1340–1350.
27.
GreenhausJBeutell (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review10(1): 76–88.
28.
GreenhausJKossekE (2014) The contemporary career: A work–home perspective. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology & Organizational Behavior1(1): 361–388.
29.
GreenhausJPowellG (2003) When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes90(2): 291–303.
30.
GreerTPayneS (2014) Overcoming telework challenges: Outcomes of successful telework strategies. The Psychologist-Manager Journal17(2): 87–111.
31.
HackmanJOldhamG (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance16(2): 250–279.
32.
HammerLCullenJNealMSinclairRShafiroM (2005) The longitudinal effects of work-family conflict and positive spillover on depressive symptoms among dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology10(2): 138–154.
33.
HillEFerrisMMartinsonV (2003) Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior63(2): 220–241.
34.
HunterEClarkMCarlsonD, et al (2017) Violating work-family boundaries: Reactions to interruptions at work and home. Journal of Management. Epub ahead of print 31 March 2017. DOI: 0149206317702221.
35.
HylandMRowsomeCRowsomeE (2005)The integrative effects of flexible work arrangements and preferences for segmenting or integrating work and home roles. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management6(2): 141–160.
36.
IliesRJohnsonMJudgeTKeeneyJ (2011) A within-individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: Dispositional and situational moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior32(1): 44–64.
37.
IliesRLiuX-YLiuYZhengX (2017) Why do employees have better family lives when they are highly engaged at work?Journal of Applied Psychology102(6): 956–970.
38.
IliesRSchwindKWagnerDJohnsonMDeRueDIlgenD (2007) When can employees have a family life? The effects of daily workload and affect on work-home conflict and social behaviors at home. Journal of Applied Psychology92(5): 1368–1379.
39.
JettQGeorgeJ (2003) Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review28(3): 494–507.
40.
KalliathTBroughP (2008)Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. Journal of Management and Organization14(3): 323–327.
41.
KossekELautschB (2012) Work–family boundary management styles in organizations: A cross-level model. Organizational Psychology Review2(2): 152–171.
42.
KossekELautschBEatonS (2006) Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior68(2): 347–367.
43.
KreinerG (2006) Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(4): 485–507.
44.
KreinerGHollensbeESheepM (2009) Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 704–730.
45.
KurlandNBaileyD (1999) When workers are here, there, and everywhere: A discussion of the advantages and challenges of telework. Organizational Dynamics28(2): 53–58.
46.
LapierreLAllenT (2006) Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology11(2): 169–181.
47.
LapierreLvan SteenbergenEPeetersMKluwerE (2016) Juggling work and family responsibilities when involuntarily working more from home: A multi-wave study of financial sales professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior37(6): 804–822.
48.
MacKinnonDLockwoodCWilliamsJ (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research39(1): 99–128.
49.
MadsenS (2003) The effects of home-based teleworking on work-family conflict. Human Resource Development Quarterly14(1): 35–58.
50.
MaertzCBoyarS (2011) Work-family conflict, enrichment, and balance under ‘levels’ and ‘episodes’ approaches. Journal of Management37(1): 68–98.
51.
MatthewsRBarnes-FarrellJBulgerC (2010) Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics. Journal of Vocational Behavior77(3): 447–460.
52.
MaumeDHoustonP (2001) Job segregation and gender differences in work-family spillover among white-collar workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues22(2): 171–189.
53.
MethotJLePineJ (2016) Too close for comfort? Investigating the nature and functioning of work and non-work role segmentation preferences. Journal of Business and Psychology31(1): 103–123.
54.
MichelJClarkM (2013) Investigating the relative importance of individual differences on the work–family interface and the moderating role of boundary preference for segmentation. Stress and Health29(4): 324–336.
55.
Olson-BuchananJBoswellW (2006) Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior68(3): 432–445.
56.
PowellGGreenhausJ (2010) Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal53(3): 513–534.
57.
RaghuramSWiesenfeldB (2004) Work-nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management43(2–3): 259–277.
58.
SchiemanSYoungM (2010) Is there a downside to schedule control for the work-family interface?Journal of Family Issues31(10): 1391–1314.
59.
ShockleyKAllenT (2007) When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior71(3): 479–493.
60.
ShockleyKAllenT (2015) Deciding between work and family: An episodic approach. Personnel Psychology68(2): 283–318.
61.
ShumateMFulkJ (2004) Boundaries and role conflict when work and family are colocated: A communication network and symbolic interaction approach. Human Relations57(1): 55–74.
62.
SiemsenERothAOliveiraP (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods13(3): 456–476.
63.
SmitBMaloneyPMaertzCMontag-Smit (2016) Out of sight, out of mind? How and when cognitive role transition episodes influence employee performance. Human Relations69(11): 2141–2168.
64.
StandenPDanielsKLamondD (1999) The home as a workplace: Work–family interaction and psychological well-being in telework. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology4(4): 368–381.
65.
van SteenbergenEYbemaJLapierreL (2018) Boundary management in action: A diary study of students’ school-home conflict. International Journal of Stress Management25(3): 267–282.
66.
VegaRAndersonAKaplan (2015) A within-person examination of the effects of telework. Journal of Business and Psychology30(2): 313–323.
67.
VerseyH (2015) Managing work and family: Do control strategies help?Developmental Psychology51(11): 1672–1681.
68.
VoydanoffP (2005) Consequences of boundary-spanning demands and resources for work-to-family conflict and perceived stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology10(4): 491–503.
69.
WoodS (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society73(1): 3–36.
