Although diversity provides a greater pool of knowledge and perspectives, teams often do not realize the potential offered by these additional informational resources. In this study, we develop a new model seeking to explain when and how teams that are diverse in terms of educational background utilize the afforded informational variety by engaging in deeper elaboration of task-relevant information. We found that collective team identification moderated the relationship between educational team diversity and elaboration of task-relevant information, such that under high (low) levels of team identification, educational diversity was positively (negatively) related to information elaboration. As expected, this moderating effect was shown to be mediated simultaneously through two different types of perceived team diversity. We found that the negative path was mediated through a perceived diversity measure reflecting a split into subgroups, whereas the positive path was mediated through a perceived diversity measure reflecting perceived educational heterogeneity. Taken together, this study contributes to the team diversity literature by shedding light on the important role of collective team identification in unlocking the potential of objective educational team diversity, by uncovering the underlying mechanisms accounting for this effect, and by demonstrating the usefulness of distinguishing between different types of perceived diversity.
AshforthBAMaelF (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
2.
BellST (2007) Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology92(3): 595–615.
3.
BlauPM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
4.
BrewerMBBrownRJ (1998) Intergroup relations. In: GilbertDTFiskeST (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 554–594.
5.
CampionMAMedskerGJHiggsAC (1993) Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology46: 823–850.
6.
CartonAMCummingsJN (2013) The impact of subgroup type and subgroup configurational properties on work team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology95(5): 732–758.
7.
CunninghamGBChoiJHSagasM (2008) Personal identity and perceived racial dissimilarity among college athletes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice12(2): 167–177.
8.
CurralLAForresterRHDawsonJFWestMA (2001) It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology10(1): 187–204.
9.
DahlinKBWeingartLRHindsPJ (2005) Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal48(6): 1107–1123.
10.
DoosjeBEllemersNSpearsR (1995) Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology31(5): 410–436.
11.
DuttonJEDukerichJMHarquailCV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly39(2): 239–263.
12.
EllemersNDe GilderDHaslamAS (2004) Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. The Academy of Management Review29(3): 459–478.
13.
GaertnerSLDovidioJF (2000) Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
14.
GaertnerSLDovidioJAnastasioPet al. (1993) The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of ingroup bias. In: StroebeWHewstoneM (eds) European Review of Social Psychology. London: Wiley, 1–26.
15.
GoncaloJChatmanJDuguidMKennedyJ (2015) Creativity from constraint: How the PC norm influences creativity in mixed-sex work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly60(1): 1–30.
16.
GuillaumeYRFBrodbeckFCRikettaM (2012) Surface- and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology85(1): 80–115.
17.
GuillaumeYRFDawsonJFOtaye-EbedeLWoodsS (2017) Harnessing demographic differences in organizations: What moderates the effects of workplace diversity?Journal of Organizational Behavior38(2): 276–303.
18.
HarrisonDAKleinKJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1199–1228.
19.
HarrisonDAPriceKHGavinJHFloreyAT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal45(5): 1029–1045.
20.
HentschelTShemlaMWeggeJKearneyE (2013) Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Group Research44(1): 33–61.
21.
HoeverIJvan KnippenbergDvan GinkelWPBarkemaHG (2012) Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology97(5): 982–996.
22.
HoggMATerryDJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25(1): 121–140.
23.
HomanACvan KnippenbergDVan KleefGADe DreuCKW (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology92(5): 1189–1199.
24.
HomanACGreerLLJehnKAKoningL (2010) Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations13(4): 477–493.
25.
HomanACHollenbeckJRHumphreySEet al. (2008) Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Academy of Management Journal51(6): 1204–1222.
26.
HorwitzSKHorwitzIB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management33(6): 987–1015.
27.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology69(1): 85–98.
28.
JehnKABezrukovaK (2010) The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes112(1): 24–42.
29.
JoshiARohH (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal52(3): 599–627.
30.
KearneyEGebertD (2009) Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology94(1): 77–89.
31.
KearneyEGebertDVoelpelSC (2009) When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal52(3): 581–598.
32.
Kooij-de BodeHJMvan KnippenbergDvan GinkelWP (2008) Ethnic diversity and distributed information ingroup decision making: The importance of information elaboration. Group Dynamics12(4): 307–320.
33.
KozlowskiSWJBellBS (2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. In: SchmittSHighhouseS (eds) Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology. London: Wiley, 412–469.
34.
LauDCMurnighanJK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organisational groups. Academy of Management Review23(2): 325–40.
35.
LinC-PHeHBaruchYAshforthBE (2016) The effect of team affective tone on team performance: The roles of team identification and team cooperation. Human Resource Management56(6): 931–952.
36.
MaelFAshforthBE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior13(2): 103–123.
37.
MannixEANealeMA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest6(2): 31–35.
38.
MayoMvan KnippenbergDGuillenLFirfirayS (2016) Team diversity and categorization salience: Capturing diversity-blind, intergroup biased, and multicultural perceptions. Organizational Research Methods19(3): 433–474.
39.
Mesmer-MagnusJRDeChurchLA (2009) Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology94(2): 535–546.
40.
MeyerBShemlaMSchermulyC (2011) Social category salience moderates the effect of diversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Research42(3): 257–282.
41.
MeyerBShemlaMWeggeJLiJ (2015) On the same side of the faultline: Inclusion in the leader’s subgroup and employee performance. Journal of Management Studies52(3): 354–380.
42.
Morgan-LopezAAMackinnonDP (2006) Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation. Behavior Research Methods38(1): 77–87.
43.
OosterhofAVan der VegtGSVan de VliertEet al. (2009) What’s the difference? Insider perspectives on the importance, content, and meaning of interpersonal differences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology82(3): 617–637.
44.
PostmesTHaslamSASwaabR (2005) Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology16: 1–42.
45.
RandelAE (2002) Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(6): 749–766.
46.
ReicherSDHopkinsN (2001) Self and Nation: Categorization, Contestation and Mobilization. London: SAGE.
47.
ReicherSDHaslamSAHopkinsN (2005) Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly164(4): 547–568.
48.
ResickCJMuraseTRandallKRDeChurchLA (2014) Information elaboration and team performance: Examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes124(2): 165–176.
49.
RiesBDiestelSShemlaMet al. (2013) Age diversity and team effectiveness. In: SchlickCMFrielingEWeggeJ (eds) Age-Differentiated Work Systems. Berlin: Springer, 89–118.
50.
RinkFEllemersN (2007) Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management18(1): 17–27.
51.
ShemlaMMeyerB (2012) Bridging diversity in organizations and cross-cultural work psychology by studying perceived differences. Industrial and Organizational Psychology – Perspectives on Science and Practice5(3): 370–372.
52.
ShemlaMMeyerBGreerLJehnKA (2016) A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team’s composition affect team processes and outcomes?Journal of Organizational Behavior37(1): 89–106.
53.
StahlGKMaznevskiMLVoigtAJonsenK (2010) Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies41(4): 690–709.
54.
SteffensNKHaslamSAKerschreiterRet al. (2014a) Leaders enhance group members’ work engagement and reduce their burnout by crafting social identity. German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management28(1–2): 173–194.
55.
SteffensNKHaslamSAKesslerTRyanMK (2013) Leader performance and prototypicality: Their inter-relationship and impact on leaders’ identity entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Psychology43(7): 606–613.
56.
SteffensNKShemlaMWeggeJDiestelS (2014b) Organizational tenure and employee performance: A multilevel analysis. Group and Organization Management39(6): 664–690.
57.
ThatcherSMBPatelPC (2011) Demographic faultlines: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology96(6): 1119–1139.
58.
TurnerJCHoggMAOakesPJReicherSDWetherellMS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
59.
van DickRvan KnippenbergDHaegeleSet al. (2008) Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations61(10): 1463–1492.
60.
van KnippenbergDHaslamSA (2003) Realizing the diversity dividend: Exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology, and reality. In: HaslamSAvan KnippenbergDPlatowMJEllemersN (eds) Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice. New York: Psychology Press, 61–77.
61.
van KnippenbergDSchippersMC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology58: 515–541.
62.
van KnippenbergDvan SchieECM (2000) Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology73: 137–147.
63.
van KnippenbergDDe DreuCKWHomanAC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology89(6): 1008–1022.
64.
van KnippenbergDvan GinkelWPHomanAC (2013) Diversity mindsets and the performance of diverse teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes121(2): 183–193.
65.
WayneSJLidenRC (1995) Effects of impression management on performance ratings – a longitudinal-study. Academy of Management Journal38(1): 232–260.
66.
WeggeJ (2003) Heterogenität und Homogenität in Gruppen als Chance und Risiko für die Gruppeneffektivität [Heterogeneity and homogeneity in groups as chance and risk for group efficiency]. In: ThomasSSA (ed.) Teamarbeit und Teamentwicklung. Toronto: Hogrefe, 119–141.
67.
WeggeJRothCNeubachBet al. (2008) Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology93(6): 1301–1313.
68.
WeggeJJungmannFLiebermannSShemlaMRiesBCDiestelS (2012a) What makes age diverse teams effective? Results from a six-year research program. WORK – a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation41(1): 5145–5151.
69.
WeggeJSchuhSCvan DickR (2012b) ‘I feel bad’, ‘We feel good’? Emotions as a driver for personal and organizational identity and organizational identification as a resource for serving unfriendly customers. Stress and Health28(2): 123–136.
70.
WilliamsHMParkerSKTurnerN (2007) Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking within work teams. Group & Organization Management32(5): 569–597.
