Despite abundant scholarship addressed to gender equity in leadership, much leadership literature remains invested in gender binaries. Metaphors of leadership are especially dependent on gender oppositions, and this article treats the scholarly practice of coding leadership through gendered metaphor as a consequential practice of leadership unto itself. Drawing on queer theory, the article develops a mode of analysis, called ‘promiscuous coding’, conducive to disrupting the gender divisions that currently anchor most leadership metaphors. Promiscuous coding can assist leadership scholars by translating the vague promise of queering leadership into a tangible method distinguished by specific habits. The article formulates this analytical practice out of empirical provocations encountered by the authors: namely, a striking mismatch between their experiences in military fields and the dominant metaphor of leading as military command. Ultimately, the article seeks to move scholarly practices of leadership toward queer performativity, in the hopes of loosening other leadership practices from a binary grip and pointing toward new relational possibilities.
AckerJ (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4(2): 139–158.
2.
Ahmed (2014) Not in the mood. New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics82: 13–28.
3.
AllardAC (2004) Speaking of gender: Teachers’ metaphorical constructs of male and female students. Gender and Education16(3): 347–363.
4.
AlvessonMSpicerA (2011) Metaphors We Lead By: Understanding Leadership in the Real World. Milton Park: Routledge.
5.
AmernicJCraigRTourishD (2007) The transformational leader as pedagogue, physician, architect, commander and saint: Five root metaphors in Jack Welch’s letters to stockholders in General Electric. Human Relations60(12): 1839–1872.
6.
AntonakisJAtwaterL (2002) Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. Leadership Quarterly13(6): 673–704.
7.
AshcraftKL (2013) The glass slipper: “Incorporating” occupational identity in management studies. Academy of Management Review38(1): 6–31.
8.
AshcraftKLAshcraftCS (2014) Motifs in the methods section: Representing the qualitative research process. In: JeanesEHuzzardT (eds) Critical Management Research: Reflections from the Field. London: SAGE, 155–172.
9.
BassBM (1990) From transactional to transformative leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics18(3): 19–31.
BrewisJHamptonM PLinsteadS (1997) Unpacking Priscilla: Subjectivity and identity in the organization of gendered appearance. Human Relations50(10): 1275–1304.
12.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.
13.
ButlerJ (1993a) Critically queer. GLQ: A Journal in Gay and Lesbian Studies1(1): 17–32.
14.
ButlerJ (1993b) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.
15.
CabantousLGondJPHardingNLearmonthM (2016) Critical essay: Reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations69(2): 197–213.
CharlesMGruskyDB (2004)Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
ChaseJ (2001) In the valley of the sweet mother: Gendered metaphors, domestic lives and reproduction under a Brazilian state mining company. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography8(2): 169–187.
19.
ClarkeM (2011) Advancing women’s careers through leadership development programs. Employee Relations33(5): 498–515.
20.
CollinsonD (2005) Questions of distance. Leadership1(2): 235–250.
21.
CollinsonD (2014) Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies?Leadership10(1): 36–55.
22.
CornelissenJPKafourosMLockAR (2005) Metaphorical images of organization: How organizational researchers develop and select organizational metaphors. Human Relations58(12): 1545–1578.
23.
CourtneySJ (2014) Inadvertently queer school leadership amongst lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) school leaders. Organization21(3): 383–399.
24.
DerridaJ (1993) Aporias. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
DiproseR (2009) Toward an ethico-politics of the posthuman: Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Parrhesia8: 7–19.
26.
DoughertyDSHodeMG (2016) Binary logics and the discursive interpretation of organizational policy: Making meaning of sexual harassment policy. Human Relations69(8): 1729–1755.
27.
EaglyAH (2005) Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter?The Leadership Quarterly16(3): 459–474.
28.
EinarsdóttirAHoelHLewisD (2015) Fitting the bill? (Dis)embodied disclosure of sexual identities in the workplace. Work, Employment and Society30(3): 489–505.
29.
ElyRJMeyersonDE (2000) Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. In: StawBMSuttonRI (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. New York: Elsvier Science.
30.
EngDLHalberstamJMunozE (2005) What’s queer about queer studies now?Social Text23(3–4): 1–17.
31.
FenstermakerSWestC (eds) (2002) Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power and Institutional Change. New York: Routledge.
32.
FisherKRobbinsCR (2015) Embodied leadership: Moving from leader competencies to leaderful practices. Leadership11(3): 281–299.
33.
FletcherJK (2004) The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly15(5): 647–661.
34.
FordJ (2006) Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership2(1): 77–99.
GrintK (2005) Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership’. Human Relations58(11): 1467–1494.
38.
GrintK (2014) The hedgehog and the fox: Leadership lessons from D-day. Leadership10(2): 240–260.
39.
HardingN (2016) New directions in queer theory: Recent theorizing in the work of Lynne Huffer, Leo Bersani & Adam Phillips, and Lauren Berlant & Lee Edelman. Gender, Work and Organization23(1): 74–83.
40.
HardingNLeeHFordJLearmonthM (2011) Leadership and charisma: A desire that cannot speak its name?Human Relations64(7): 927–949.
41.
HaslamARyanMK (2008) The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly19(5): 530–546.
42.
HultinM (2003) Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Career consequences of occupational sex segregation. Work and Occupations30(1): 30–61.
43.
JustSNMuhrSLBurøT (2017) Queer matters: Reflections on the critical potential of affective organizing. In: HardingNPhillipsMPullenA (eds) Feminists and Queer Politics Debate the Future of Critical Management Studies. Dialogues in Critical Management Studies, Vol.3. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
44.
KarkRWaismel-ManorRShamirB (2012) Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification. The Leadership Quarterly23(3): 620–640.
45.
KingA (2016) Queer categories: Queer(y)ing the identification ‘older lesbian, gay and/or bisexual (LGB) adults’ and its implications for organizational research, policy and practice. Gender, Work and Organization23(1): 7–18.
46.
KollerJ (2004) Business women and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’?Journal of Sociolinguistics8(1): 3–22.
47.
KrasikovaDVGrenSVLeBretonJM (2013) Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management39(5): 1308–1338.
LarsenFHansenTBEllersgaardCKroghAH (2015) Kvinder i ledelse – Analyse af lov om måltal og politik or det underrepresenterede køn. Institut for Menneskerettigheder.
50.
LeeHLearmonthMHardingN (2008) Queering public administration. Public Administration86(1): 149–167.
51.
LeichtCde MouraGRCrispRJ (2014) Contesting gender stereotypes stimulates generalized fairness in the selection of leaders. The Leadership Quarterly25(5): 1025–1039.
52.
LinsteadSMarechálG (2015) Re-reading masculine organization: Phallic, testicular and seminal metaphors. Human Relations68(9): 1461–1489.
53.
LinsteadSPullenA (2006) Gender as multiplicity: Desire, displacement, difference and dispersion. Human Relations59(9): 1287–1310.
54.
LudemanKErlandsonE (2006) Alpha Male Syndrome. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
55.
MageeRR (1998) Strategic Leadership Primer. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.
56.
MolA (1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: LawJHassardJ (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, 74–89.
MuhrSL (2011) Caught in the gendered machine: On the masculine and feminine in cyborg leadership. Gender, Work and Organization18(3): 337–357.
59.
MuhrSLSullivanK (2013) ‘None so queer as folk’: Gendered expectations and transgressive bodies in leadership. Leadership9(3): 419–435.
60.
MuhrSLSullivanKRichC (2016) Situated transgressiveness: Exploring one transwoman’s lived experiences across three situated contexts. Gender, Work and Organization23(1): 52–70.
61.
OllilainenOCalasantiT (2007) Metaphors at work: Maintaining the salience of gender in self-managing teams. Gender and Society21(1): 5–2.
62.
ParkerM (2002) Queering management and organization. Gender, Work and Organization9(2): 146–166.
63.
PelletierKL (2010) Leader toxicity: An empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadership6(4): 373–389.
64.
PrasadA (2012) Beyond analytical dichotomies. Human Relations65(5): 567–595.
65.
PriceTL (2003) The ethics of authentic transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly14(1): 67–81.
66.
PrinceL (2005) Eating the menu rather than the dinner: Tao and leadership. Leadership1(1): 105–126.
67.
PullenARhodesC (2014) Corporeal ethics and the politics of resistance in organizations. Organization21(6): 782–796.
68.
PullenAThanemTTylerMWallenbergL (2016) Sexual politics, organizational practices: Interrogating queer theory, work and organization. Gender Work and Organization23(1): 1–6.
69.
RiachKRumensNTylerM (2016) Towards a Butlerian methodology: Undoing organizational performativity through anti-narrative research. Human Relations69(11): 2069–2089.
70.
RomaniLHolckLHolgerssonCMuhrSL (2016) Diversity management and the Scandinavian model: Illustrations from Denmark and Sweden. In: ChanlatJFÖzbilginM (eds) Management and Diversity: Main Constitutions in Different Countries. London: Emerald.
71.
RottmannC (2006) Queering educational leadership from the inside out. International Journal of Leadership in Education9(1): 1–20.
72.
RumensN (2008) Working at intimacy: Gay men’s workplace friendships. Gender, Work and Organization15(1): 9–30.
73.
RumensN (2016) Towards queering the business school: A research agenda for advancing lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans perspectives and issues. Gender, Work and Organization23(1): 36–51.
74.
RumensNKerfootD (2009) Gay men at work: (Re)constructing the self as professional. Human Relations62(5): 763–786.
75.
SpicerA (2011) Leader as commander: Leadership through creating clear direction. In: AlvessonMSpicerA (eds) Metaphors We Lead By: Understanding Leadership in the Real World. Milton Park: Routledge, 118–137.
76.
StewartK (2007) Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
77.
TylerMCohenL (2008) Management in/as comic relief: Queer theory and gender performativity in the office. Gender, Work and Organization15(2): 113–132.
78.
WestCZimmermanD (1987) Doing gender. Gender and Society1(2): 125–151.
79.
WongLBliesePMcGurkD (2003) Military leadership: A context specific review. The Leadership Quarterly14(6): 657–692.
80.
ZieglerJADeGroskyMT (2008) Managing the meaning of leadership: Leadership as ‘communicating intent’ in wildland firefighting. Leadership4(3): 271–297.
81.
ZollerHFairhurstG (2007) Resistance leadership: The overlooked potential in critical organization and leadership studies. Human Relations60(9): 1331–1360.
