Proactive work behaviors are self-initiated, future-focused actions aimed at bringing about changes to work processes in organizations. Such behaviors occur within the social context of work. The extant literature that has focused on the role of social context for proactivity has focused on social context as an overall input or output of proactivity. However, in this article we argue that the process of engaging in proactive work behavior (proactive goal-striving) may also be a function of the social context in which it occurs. Based on qualitative data from 39 call center employees in an energy-supply company, we find that in a context characterized by standardized work procedures, proactive goal-striving can occur through a proactivity routine – a socially constructed and accepted pattern of action by which employees initiate and achieve changes to work processes, with the support of managers and colleagues. Our findings point to the need to view proactive work behaviors at a higher level of analysis than the individual in order to identify shared routines for engaging in proactivity, as well as how multiple actors coordinate their efforts in the process of achieving individually-generated proactive goals.
BaerMFreseM (2003) Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiation and psychological safety, process innocations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior24(1): 45–68.
2.
BainPTaylorP (2000) Entrapped by the ‘electronic panopticon’? Worker resistance in the call centre. New Technology, Work and Employment15(1): 2–18.
3.
BakkerATimsMDerksD (2012) Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations65(10): 1359–1378.
4.
BattR (2002) Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal45(3): 587–597.
5.
BattRMoynihanL (2002) The viability of alternative call centre production models. Human Resource Management Journal12(4): 14–34.
6.
BeckerMC (ed.) (2008) Handbook of Organizational Routines. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
7.
BindlUKParkerSK (2010) Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In: ZedeckS (ed.) APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 567–598.
8.
BindlUKParkerSKTotterdellPHagger-JohnsonG (2012). Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology97(1): 134–150.
9.
CampbellDJ (2000) The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive14(3): 52–66.
10.
CohenMDBacdayanP (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science5(4): 554–568.
11.
CrantJM (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management26(3): 435–462.
12.
de JongADe RuyterK (2004) Adaptive versus proactive behavior in service recovery: The role of self-managing teams. Decision Sciences35(3): 457–491.
13.
Den HartogDNBelschakFD (2012) When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology97(1): 194–202.
14.
DuttonJEAshfordSJO’NeillRMLawrenceKA (2001) Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal44(4): 716–736.
15.
DuttonJEAshfordSJLawrenceKAMiner-RubinoK (2002) Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science13(4): 353–369.
16.
FayDLührmannHKohlC (2004) Proactive climate in a post-reorganization setting: When staff compensate managers weakness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology13(2): 241–267.
17.
FeldmanMSOrlikowskiWJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practing theory. Organization Science22(5): 1240–1253.
18.
FeldmanMSPentlandBT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly48(1): 94–118.
19.
FeldmanMSRafaeliA (2002) Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies39(3): 309–331.
20.
FreseMFayD (2001) Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In: StawBMSuttonRM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 133–187.
21.
FreseMKringWSooseAZempelJ (1996) Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal39(1): 37–63.
22.
FreseMTengEWijnenCJD (1999) Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior20(7): 1139–1155.
23.
FreseMGarstHFayD (2007) Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 1084–1102.
24.
FullerJBMarlerLEHesterK (2006) Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(8): 1089–1120.
25.
FullerJBMarlerLEHesterKOtondoRF (2015) Leader reaction to follower proactive behavior: Giving credit when credit is due. Human Relations68(6): 879–898.
26.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
27.
GongYCheungS-YWangMHuangJ-C (2012) Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management38(5): 1611–1633.
28.
GrantAMAshfordSJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior28: 3–34.
29.
GriffinMANealAParkerSK (2007) A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal50(2): 327–347.
30.
GriffinMAParkerSKMasonCM (2010) Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology95(1): 174–182.
31.
HackmanJRWagemanR (1995) Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly40: 309–342.
32.
HillS (1991) Why quality circles failed but total quality management might succeed. British Journal of Industrial Relations29(4): 541–568.
33.
HodgsonD (2002) Disciplining the professional: The case of project management. Journal of Management Studies39(6): 803–821.
34.
HolmanDJ (2005) Call centres. In: HolmanDJWallTDCleggCWet al. (eds) The Essentials of the New Workplace: A Guide to the Human Impact of Modern Working Practices. Chichester: Wiley, 111–131.
35.
IbarraH (1993) Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal36(3): 471–501.
36.
KaufmannGMBeehrTA (1989) Occupational stressors, individual strains, and social supports among police officers. Human Relations42(2): 185–197.
37.
KozlowskiSWJKleinKJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 3–90.
38.
LeeTWMitchellTRSablynskiCJ (1999) Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior55(2): 161–187.
39.
LiNLiangJCrantJM (2010) The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Pscyhology95(2): 395–404.
40.
McIntoshNJ (1991) Identification and investigation of properties of social support. Journal of Organizational Behavior12(3): 201–217.
41.
MetcalfDFernieS (1998) (Not) hanging on the telephone: Payment systems in the new sweatshops. Centrepiece3: 7–11.
42.
MilesMHubermanM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd edn). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
43.
MorrisonEWPhelpsC (1999) Taking charge: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal42(4): 403–419.
44.
NiccoliniD (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
OhlySFritzC (2007) Challenging the status quo: What motivates proactive behaviour?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology80(4): 623–629.
46.
OhlySSonnentagSPluntkeF (2006) Routinization, work characteristics and their relationship with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(3): 257–279.
47.
ParkerSK (1998) Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology83(6): 835–852.
48.
ParkerSK (2000) From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology49(3): 447–469.
49.
ParkerSK (2014) Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology65: 661–691.
50.
ParkerSKCollinsCG (2010) Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management36(3): 633–662.
51.
ParkerSKWilliamsHMTurnerN (2006) Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology91(3): 636–652.
52.
ParkerSKBindlUKStraussK (2010) Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management36(4): 827–856.
53.
PentlandBTReuterHH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly39: 484–510.
54.
RaischSBirkinshawJ (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management34(3): 375–409.
55.
RankJCarstenJMUngerJMSpectorPE (2007) Proactive customer service performance: Relationships with individual, task, and leadership variables. Human Performance20(4): 363–390.
56.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78.
57.
SeidmanIE (1991) Interviewing as Qualitative Research. New York: Teachers College Press.
58.
SewellG (1998) The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly43: 397–428.
59.
ShahSKCorleyKG (2006) Building better theory by bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. Journal of Management Studies43(8): 1821–1835.
60.
SonnentagSStarzykA (2015) Perceived prosocial impact, perceived situational constraints, and proactive work behavior: Looking at two distinct affective pathways. Journal of Organizational Behavior36(6): 806–824.
61.
StakeRE (1978) The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher7(2): 5–8.
62.
StawBMBoettgerRD (1990) Task revision: A neglected from of work performance. Academy of Management Review33(3): 534–559.
63.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
64.
StraussKGriffinMARaffertyAE (2009) Proactivity directed toward the team and organization: The role of leadership, commitment and role-breadth self-efficacy. British Journal of Management20(3): 279–291.
65.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
66.
ThomasJPWhitmanDSViswesvaranC (2010) Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology83(2): 275–300.
67.
ThompsonJA (2005) Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology90(5): 1011–1017.
68.
TornauKFreseM (2013) Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Applied Psychology: An International Review62(1): 44–96.
69.
Van DyneLLePineJA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal41(1): 108–119.
70.
Van MaanenJ (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly24: 539–550.
71.
VaughanD (1992) Theory elaboration: The heuristics of case analysis. In: BeckerHRaginC (eds) What is a Case?New York: Cambridge University Press, 173–202.
72.
WhyteWF (1979) On making the most of participant observation. The American Sociologist14(1): 56–66.
73.
WorkmanMBommerW (2004) Redesigning computer call center work: A longitudinal field experiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior25(3): 317–337.
74.
WrzesniewskiADuttonJE (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review26(2): 179–201.
75.
WuCParkerSK (2016) The role of leader support in facilitating proactive work behavior: A perspective from attachment theory. Journal of Management. DOI: 10.1177/0149206314544745.
76.
WuCParkerSde JongJ (2014) Feedback seeking from peers: A positive strategy for insecurely attached team-workers. Human Relations67(4): 441–464.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
