This article critically analyses the manner in which intersectionality and related social positionality shape digital enterprise activities. Despite popular claims of meritocratic opportunity enactment within traditional forms of entrepreneurship, ascribed social characteristics intersect to influence the realization of entrepreneurial potential. However, it is purported that the emerging field of digital entrepreneurship may act as a ‘great leveller’ owing to perceived lower barriers to entry, disembodiment of the entrepreneurial actor and the absence of visible markers of disadvantage online. Using an interpretivist approach, we analyse empirical evidence that reveals how the privileges and disadvantages arising from intersecting social positions of gender, race and class status are experienced by UK women digital entrepreneurs. This analysis challenges the notion that the internet is a neutral platform for entrepreneurship and supports our thesis that offline inequality, in the form of marked bodies, social positionality and associated resource constraints, is produced and reproduced in the online environment.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20(4): 441–464.
3.
AdibAGuerrierY (2003) The interlocking of gender with nationality, race, ethnicity and class: The narratives of women in hotel work. Gender, Work and Organization10(4): 413–432.
4.
AhlH (2006) Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(5): 595–621.
5.
AhlHMarlowS (2012) Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end?Organization19(5): 543–562.
6.
AhmedS (2012) On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham, MD and London: Duke University Press.
Al-DajaniHMarlowS (2013) Empowerment and entrepreneurship: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research19(5): 503–524.
9.
AndersonAMillerC (2003) ‘Class matters’: Human and social capital in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Socio-Economics32(1): 17–36.
10.
AnthiasF (2001a) New hybridities, old concepts: The limits of ‘culture’. Ethnic and Racial Studies24(4): 619–641.
11.
AnthiasF (2001b) The material and the symbolic in theorizing social stratification: Issues of gender, ethnicity and class. British Journal of Sociology52(3): 367–390.
12.
AnthiasF (2006) Belongings in a globalising and unequal world: Rethinking translocations. In: Yuval-DavisNKannabiranKVietenU (eds) The Situated Politics of Belonging. London: SAGE, 17–31.
13.
AnthiasF (2007) Ethnic ties: Social capital and the question of mobilisability. The Sociological Review55(4): 788–805.
14.
AnthiasF (2008) Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: An intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations: Migration and Social Change4(1): 5–20. Available at: http://www.dcu.ie/imrstr/volume_4_issue_1/Vol_4_Issue_1_Floya_Anthias.pdf (accessed 19 January 2013).
15.
AnthiasF (2013) Hierarchies of social location, class and intersectionality: Towards a translocational frame. International Sociology28(1): 121–137.
16.
Anyadike-DanesMHartMDuJ (2015) Firm dynamics and job creation in the United Kingdom: 1998–2013. International Small Business Journal33(1): 12–27.
17.
AshleyLEmpsonL (2013) Differentiation and discrimination: Understanding social class and social exclusion in leading law firms. Human Relations66(2): 219–244.
18.
BarbourR (2001) Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog?British Medical Journal322(7294): 1115–1117.
19.
BowenGA (2008) Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research8(1): 137–152.
BradleyH (2014) Class descriptors or class relations? Thoughts towards a critique of Savage et al. Sociology48(3): 429–436.
23.
BradleyHHealyG (2008) Ethnicity and Gender at Work: Inequalities, Careers and Employment Relations. London and New York: Palgrave and Macmillan.
24.
BraguinskySKlepperSOhyamaA (2012) High-tech entrepreneurship. Journal of Law and Economics55(4): 869–900.
25.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
26.
ByrneB (2006) White Lives: The Interplay of ‘Race’, Class and Gender in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
27.
CarbinMEdenheimS (2013) The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language?European Journal of Women’s Studies20(3): 233–248.
28.
CarterSMwauraSRamM, et al. (2015) Barriers to ethnic minority and Women’s enterprise: Existing evidence, policy tensions and unsettled questions. International Small Business Journal33(1): 49–69.
29.
CaseP (2003) From objectivity to subjectivity: Pursuing subjective authenticity in organizational research. In: WestwoodRCleggS (eds) Debating Organization: Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 35–49.
30.
CastellsM (2010) The Rise of the Network Society. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
32.
CrenshawK (1997) Intersectionality and identity politics: Learning from violence against women of colour. In: ShanleyMLNarayanU (eds) Reconstructing Political Theory. Oxford: Polity Press, 178–193.
DanielsJ (2012) Race and racism in internet studies: A review and critique. New Media & Society15(5): 695–719.
36.
DavidsonEVaastE (2010) Digital entrepreneurship and its sociomaterial enactment. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference. Honolulu, HI, 5–8 January. Available at: http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/bp43/IN6.pdf (accessed 1 March 2014).
37.
DavidsonMFieldenSOmarA (2010) Black, Asian and minority ethnic female business owners. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research16(1): 58–80.
38.
De BruinABrushCGWelterF (2007) Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(3): 323–339.
39.
EriksenT (1996) Ethnicity, race, class and nation. In: HutchinsonASmithA (eds) Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 28–31.
40.
Eriksson-ZetterquistULindbergKStyhreA (2009) When the good times are over: Professionals encountering new technology. Human Relations62(8): 1145–1167.
41.
EssersCBenschopYDoorewardH (2010) Female ethnicity: Understanding Muslim immigrant businesswomen in the Netherlands. Gender, Work and Organization17(3): 320–339.
FieldenSDavidsonM (2012) BAME women business owners: How intersectionality affects discrimination and social support. Gender in Management: An International Journal27(8): 559–581.
44.
ForsonC (2006) The strategic framework for women’s enterprise: BME women at the margins. Equal Opportunities International25(6): 418–432.
45.
ForsonC (2013) Contextualising migrant black business women’s work-life balance experiences. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research19(5): 460–477.
46.
ForsonCÖzbilginM (2003) Dot-com women entrepreneurs in the UK. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation4(1): 13–24.
47.
FraserSBhaumikSKWrightM (2015) What do we know about entrepreneurial finance and its relationship with growth?International Small Business Journal33(1): 70–88.
48.
GeertsEVan der TuinI (2013) From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation. Women’s Studies International Forum41(3): 171–178.
49.
GenachowskiJ (2011) Prepared remarks of Chairman Julius Genachowski, Federal Communications Commission. Presented at Minority Media & Telecom Council Broadband and Social Justice Summit, Washington, DC, USA, January.
50.
GolombiskyK (2006) Gendering the interview: Feminist reflections on gender as performance in research. Women’s Studies in Communication29(2): 165–192.
GioiaDJHamiltonKECorleyAL (2012) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods16(1): 15–31.
53.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1): 59–82.
HarawayD (1989) The biopolitics of postmodern bodies: Determinations of self in immune system discourse. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies1(1): 3–43.
HealyGBradleyHForsonC (2011) Intersectional sensibilities in analysing inequality regimes in public sector organizations. Gender, Work & Organization18(5): 467–487.
HenryCFossLAhlH (2016) Gender and entrepreneurship research: A review of methodological approaches. International Small Business Journal34(3): 217–241.
60.
Hill CollinsP (2000 [1990]) Black Feminist Thought, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge.
61.
HögbergLSchölinTRamMJonesT (2016) Categorising and labelling entrepreneurs: Business support organisations constructing the Other through prefixes of ethnicity and immigrantship. International Small Business Journal34(3): 242–260.
62.
HolvinoE (2010) Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work and Organization17(3): 248–277.
63.
hooksb (1981) Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.
64.
hooksb (2015 [2000]) Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Oxon: Routledge.
65.
HullCEHungYCHairN, et al. (2007) Taking advantage of digital opportunities: A typology of digital entrepreneurship. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations4(3): 290–303.
66.
ItumaASimpsonR (2009) The ‘boundaryless’ career and career boundaries: Applying an institutionalist perspective to ICT workers in the context of nigeria. Human Relations62(5): 727–761.
67.
JacksonC (2012) Speech, gender and power: Beyond testimony. Development and Change43(5): 999–1023.
68.
JayawarnaDJonesOMacphersonA (2014a) Entrepreneurial potential: The role of human and cultural capitals. International Small Business Journal32(8): 918–943.
69.
JayawarnaDRouseJMacphersonA (2014b) Life course pathways to business start-up. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development26(3–4): 282–312.
70.
JomeLMDonahueMPSiegelLA (2006) Working in the uncharted technology frontier: Characteristics of women web entrepreneurs. Journal of Business and Psychology21(1): 127–147.
71.
KaplanGMalach-PinesA (2010) Women serial high-technology entrepreneurs. In: Malach-PinesAÖzbilginM (eds) Handbook of Research on High-Technology Entrepreneurs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 333–344.
72.
KarnerC (2007) Ethnicity and Everyday Life. Oxon: Routledge.
73.
KelanE (2009) Performing Gender at Work. Houndmills: Palgrave-MacMillan.
74.
KettreyHHLasterWN (2014) Staking territory in the ‘World White Web’: An exploration of the roles of overt and color-blind racism in maintaining racial boundaries on a popular web site. Social Currents1(3): 257–274.
75.
KitchingJMarlowS (2013) HR practice and small firm growth: Balancing informality and Formality. In: SaridakisGCooperCL (eds) How Can HR Drive Growth?Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 26–40.
76.
KnightM (2016) Raceing, classing and gendering racialized women’s participation in entrepreneurship. Gender, Work and Organization23(3): 310–327.
77.
KwongCThompsonPJones-EvansDBrooksbankD (2009) Nascent entrepreneurial activity within female ethnic minority groups, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research15(3): 262–281.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE.
82.
MarlowS (2002) Women and self-employment: A part of or apart from theoretical construct?The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation3(2): 83–91.
83.
MarlowS (2014) Exploring future research agendas in the field of gender and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship6(2): 102–120.
84.
MarlowSMcAdamM (2015) Incubation or induction? Gendered identity work in the context of technology business incubation. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice39(4): 791–816.
85.
MartinLMWrightLT (2005) No gender in cyberspace? Empowering entrepreneurship and innovation in female-run ICT small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research11(2): 162–178.
86.
Martinez DyAMartinLMarlowS (2014) Developing a critical realist positional approach to intersectionality. Journal of Critical Realism13(5): 447–466.
87.
MarwickA (2014) Conform or fail: Social media’s broken promise. New Scientist, 13May, pp. 28–29.
88.
MasonCMCarterSTaggS (2011) Invisible businesses: The characteristics of home-based businesses in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies45(5): 625–639.
89.
MayV (2015) Pursing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries. New York: Routledge.
90.
MayerH (2006) Economic trends and location patterns of women high-tech entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research26(11) Article 1. Available at: http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol26/iss11/1 (accessed 8 December 2012).
91.
MirchandaniK (2000) ‘The best of both worlds’ and ‘Cutting my own throat’: Contradictory images of home based work. Qualitative Sociology23(2): 159–182.
92.
MoleKFMoleM (2010) Entrepreneurship as the structuration of individual and opportunity: A response using a critical realist perspective: Comment on Sarason, Dean and Dillard. Journal of Business Venturing25(2): 230–237.
93.
NakamuraL (2008) Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. New York: Routledge.
OgborJO (2000) Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies37(5): 605–635.
96.
RobbAWatsonJ (2012) Gender differences in firm performance: Evidence from new ventures in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing27(5): 544–558.
97.
RouseJJayawarnaD (2006) The financing of disadvantaged entrepreneurs: Are enterprise programmes overcoming the finance gap?International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research12(6): 388–400.
98.
SassenS (2002) Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology50(3): 365–388.
99.
SavageMDevineFCunninghamN, et al. (2013) A new model of social class: Findings from the BBC’s Great British class survey experiment. Sociology47(2): 219–250.
SchultzeU (2014) Performing embodied identity in virtual worlds. European Journal of Information Systems23: 84–95
102.
StoreyDJGreeneFJ (2010) Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
103.
Thompson JacksonJ (2009) Capitalizing on digital entrepreneurship for low-income residents and communities. West Virginia Law Review112(1): 187–198.
104.
TomlinsonJMuzioDSommerladH, et al. (2013) Structure, agency and career strategies of white women and black and minority ethnic individuals in the legal profession. Human Relations66(2): 245–269.
105.
Van LaerKJanssensM (2011) Ethnic minority professionals’ experiences with subtle discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations64(9): 1203–1227.
106.
WajcmanJ (2010) Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics34(1): 143–152.
107.
WajcmanJ (2015) Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
108.
WeickKE (2007) The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal50(1): 14–19.
109.
WilliamsM (2011) Office of National Statistics Metadata, Internet Access – Households and Individuals, 2011 . Released: 31August2011. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_227158.pdf (accessed 28 October 2014).
110.
WoodsT (2013) Surrogate selves: Notes on anti-trafficking and anti-blackness. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture19(1): 120–134.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
