Do women advance equity? The effect of gender leadership composition on LGBT-friendly policies in American firms

Abstract

We advance the literature on the demographic factors that shape organizational outcomes by analyzing the impact of the gender composition of firm leadership on the likelihood that a firm will adopt lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)-friendly policies. Drawing on social role and token theory, we test the relative impact of CEO gender and the gender composition of the board of directors separately and together in order to identify the effects of gender diversity at the top of the organization. We rely on a unique data set that includes corporate policies (gender identity and sexual orientation non-discrimination policies, domestic-partner benefits, and overall corporate equality index scores) as well as the gender of the CEO and board of directors among Fortune 500 firms over a 10-year period. Our findings suggest that firms with gender-diverse boards are more likely than other firms to offer LGBT-friendly policies, whereas findings for firms with women CEOs offer mixed results.

Keywords

gender LGBT organizational demography sexual orientation workplace policies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organizations. Gender and Society 20(4): 441–464.

Adams

Funk

(2009) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science 58(2): 219–235.

Allison

(2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Arthur

Cook

(2009) Shareholder returns for a Catalyst Award. Group & Organization Management 34(4): 432–448.

Ayoub

(2014) Contested norms in new-adopter states: International determinants of LGBT rights legislation. European Journal of International Relations 21(2): 293–322.

Badgett

MVL

Durso

Kastanis

Mallory

(2013) The business impact of LGBT-supportive workplace policies. Working paper, The Williams Institute, UCLA. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vt6t9zx. Retrieved February 2015.

Bear

Rahaman

Post

(2010) The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 97(2): 207–221.

Bell

Nkomo

(2001) Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Professional Identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Bem

(1981) Gender scheme theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review 88(4): 354–364.

10.

Bilimoria

Wheeler

(2000) Women corporate directors: Current research and future directions. In: Davidson

Burke

(eds) Women in Management: Current Research Issues. London: Paul Chapman Publishers, 138–163.

11.

Blazovich

Cook

Huston

Strawser

(2013) Do gay-friendly corporate policies enhance firm performance? SSRN working paper.

12.

Bradshaw

Wicks

(2000) Experiences of white women on corporate boards in Canada: Compliance and non-compliance to hegemonic masculinity. In: Burke

Mattis

(eds) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities. The Netherlands: Kluwer, 197–212.

13.

Briscoe

Safford

(2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly 53(3): 460–491.

14.

Carter

Simkins

Simpson

(2003) Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. Financial Review 38(1): 33–53.

15.

Chambliss

Uggen

(2000) Men and women of elite law firms: Reevaluating Kanter’s legacy. Law and Social Inquiry 25(1): 41–68.

16.

Chen

Dyball

Wright

(2009) The link between board composition and corporate diversification in Australian corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17(2): 208–223.

17.

Chodorow

(1974) Family structure and feminist perspective. In: Rosaldo

Lamphere

(eds) Women in Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 41–48.

18.

Chuang

Church

Ophir

(2011) Taking sides: The interactive influences of institutional mechanisms on the adoption of same-sex partner health benefits by Fortune 500 corporations. Organization Science 22(1): 190–209.

19.

Ciszek

Gallicano

(2013) Changing cultural stigma: A pilot study of sexual orientation and mental illness organizations. Public Relations Review 39(1): 82–84.

20.

Colgan

Creegan

McKearney

Wright

(2007) Equality and diversity policies and practices at work: Lesbian, gay and bisexual workers. Equal Opportunities International 26(6): 590–609.

21.

Coltrane

(2006) Engendering children. In: Handel

(ed.) Childhood Socialization. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine, 279–310.

22.

Cook

Glass

(2011) Does diversity damage corporate value? Measuring stock price reactions to diversity awards. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34(12): 2173–2191.

23.

Cook

Glass

(2014) The power of one or power in numbers? Analyzing the effect of minority leaders on organizational policy and practice. Work & Occupations 42(2): 183–215.

24.

Cunningham

Sartore

McCullough

(2010) The influence of applicant sexual orientation, applicant gender and rater gender on ascribed attributes and hiring recommendations of personal trainers. Journal of Sport Management 24(4): 400–415.

25.

Davison

Rouse

(2004) Exploring domestic partnership benefits policies in corporate America. Journal of Homosexuality 48(2): 21–44.

26.

Day

Greene

(2008) A case for sexual orientation diversity management in small and large organizations. Human Resource Management 47(3): 637–654.

27.

Day

Schoenrade

(1997) Staying in the closet vs. coming out: Relationships between communication about sexual orientation and work attitudes. Personnel Psychology 50(1): 147–163.

28.

Dezső

Ross

(2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal 33(9): 1072–1089.

29.

Drydakis

(2015) Sexual orientation discrimination in the United Kingdom’s labor market: A field experiment. Human Relations. Epub ahead of print 8 April. DOI: 10.1177/0018726715569855.

30.

Duguid

Loyd

Tolbert

(2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat aproach. Organization Science 23(2): 386–401.

31.

Eagly

Carli

(2007) Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

32.

Eagly

Johannesen-Schmidt

Van Engen

(2003) Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin 129(4): 569–591.

33.

Eagly

Johnson

(1990) Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 108(2): 233–256.

34.

Eagly

Karau

(2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109(3): 573–598.

35.

Eagly

Wood

Diekman

(2000) Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In: Eckes

Trautner

(eds) The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 123–174.

36.

Ely

(1995) Power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal 38(3): 589–634.

37.

Everly

Schwartz

(2015) Predictors of the adoption of LGBT-friendly HR policies. Human Resource Management 54(2): 367–382.

38.

Everly

Shih

(2012) Don’t ask, don’t tell? Does disclosure of gay identity affect partner performance? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(1): 407–410.

39.

Finkelstein

D’Aveni

(1994) CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal 37(5): 1079–1108.

40.

Fondas

Sassalos

(2000) A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus 12: 13–22.

41.

Gilligan

(1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

42.

Githens

(2009) Capitalism, identity politics, and queerness coverage: LGBT employee resource groups. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development 23(3): 18–31.

43.

Golden

Zajac

(2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination X power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 22(12): 1087–1111.

44.

Griffith

Hebl

(2002) The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: ‘Coming out’ at work. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(6): 1191–1199.

45.

Guittar

Pals

(2014) Intersecting gender with race and religiosity: Do unique social categories explain attitudes toward homosexuality? Current Sociology 62(1): 41–62.

46.

Gunther

(2006) Queer Inc. Fortune. December 11^th issue. Available at: http://www.bergenpflag.com/gay_rights/061130_Corporate_gay_rights.pdf. Retrieved April 2015.

47.

Haunschild

(1993) Inter-organizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(4): 564–592.

48.

Heilman

Fuchs

Tamkins

(2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3): 416–427.

49.

Helfer

Voeten

(2014) International courts as agents of legal change: Evidence from LGBT rights in Europe. International Organization 68(1): 77–110.

50.

Hill

(2013) Is the Black community more homophobic? Reflections on the intersectionality of race, class, gender, culture and religiosity of the perception of homophobia in the Black community. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health 17(2): 208–214.

51.

Hillman

Shropshire

Canella

(2007) Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal 50(4): 941–952.

52.

Hogg

van Knippenberg

Rast

(2012) Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review 37(2): 232–255.

53.

Human Rights Campaign (2014) Available at: http://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/lgbt-equality-at-the-fortune-500. Retrieved April 2015.

54.

Human Rights Campaign (2015) Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Available at: http://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/employment-non-discrimination-act. Retrieved August 2015.

55.

Huffman

Watrous-Rodriguez

King

(2008) Supporting a diverse workforce: What type of support is most meaningful for lesbian and gay employees? Human Resource Management 47(2): 237–253.

56.

Johnston

Malina

(2008) Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group Organizational Management 33(5): 602–625.

57.

Kanter

(1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

58.

Karpowitz

Mendelberg

Shaker

(2012) Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review 106(3): 533–547.

59.

Konrad

Cannings

Goldberg

(2010) Asymmetrical demography effects on psychological climate for gender diversity: Differential effects of leader gender and work unity among Swedish doctors. Human Relations 63(11): 1661–1685.

60.

Konrad

Prasad

Pringle

(eds) (2006) Handbook of Workplace Diversity. London: SAGE.

61.

Loyd

White

Kern

(2007) Duo status: Disentangling the complex interactions within a minority of two. In: Phillips

Mannix

Neale

(eds) Research on Managing Groups. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 75–92.

62.

Matsa

Miller

(2011) Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. American Economic Review 101(3): 635–639.

63.

Matsa

Miller

(2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal 5(3): 136–169.

64.

McCabe

Ingram

Dato-on

(2006) The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64(2): 101–116.

65.

McGuire

(1999) Do race and sex affect employees’ access to help from mentors? Insights from the study of a large corporation. In: Crosby

Ely

Murrell

(eds) Mentoring Dilemmas: Developmental Relationships within Multicultural Organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 105–120.

66.

Miller

Triana

MDC

(2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies 46(5): 755–786.

67.

Mizruchi

(1996) What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 271–298.

68.

Nesbitt

(1997) Gender, tokenism and the construction of elite clergy careers. Review of Religious Research 38(3): 193–210.

69.

Newburry

(2012) Organizational actions in face of institutional contestation: Diffusion of LGBT-friendly policies. Academy of Management Proceedings, January. Available at: http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2012/1/1.131.short. Retrieved February 2015.

70.

Opall

(2012) What motivates Minnesota’s Fortune 500 to create equitable work environments for GLBT People? Unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Available at: http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/129990/1/Opall_umn_0130E_12748.pdf. Retrieved February 2015.

71.

Ozturk

(2011) Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in Turkey. Human Relations 64(8): 1099–1118.

72.

Raeburn

(2004) Lesbian and Gay Workplace Rights: Changing Corporate American from Inside Out. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

73.

Ragins

Cornwell

(2001) Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(6): 1244–1261.

74.

Ridgeway

(2001) Gender, status and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 637–655.

75.

Rosener

(1995) America’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

76.

Rudman

Glick

(2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 743–762.

77.

Rumens

Kerfoot

(2009) Gay men at work: (Re)constructing the self as professional. Human Relations 62(5): 763–786.

78.

Sears

Mallory

Hunter

(2011) Economic motives for adopting LGBT-related workplace policies. Working paper, The Williams Institute, UCLA.

79.

Seidman

Meeks

Traschen

(1999) Beyond the closet? The changing social meaning of homosexuality in the United States. Sexualities 2(1): 9–34.

80.

Shropshire

(2010) The role of interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review 35(2): 246–264.

81.

Siegel

Licht

Schwartz

(2011) Egalitarianism and international investment. Journal of Financial Economics 102(3): 621–642.

82.

Skaggs

(2008) Producing change or bagging opportunity? The effects of discrimination litigation on women in supermarket management. American Journal of Sociology 113(4): 1148–1183.

83.

Skaggs

Stainback

Duncan

(2012) Shaking things up or business as usual? The influence of female corporate executives and board of directors on women’s managerial representation. Social Science Research 41(4): 936–948.

84.

Stainback

Tomaskovic-Devey

(2009) Intersections of power and privilege: Long-term trends in managerial representation. American Sociological Review 74(5): 800–820.

85.

Terjesen

Singh

(2008) Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics 83(1): 55–63.

86.

Thompson

Sekaquaptewa

(2002) When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2(1): 183–203.

87.

Todd

(2005) Diversity pays financially as well as in other ways. HR Focus 82(12): 9.

88.

Torchia

Calabro

Huse

(2011) Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics 102(2): 299–317.

89.

Van Wanrooy

Bewley

Bryson

Forth

Freeth

Stokes

Wood

(2013) Employment Relations in the Shadow of Recession: Findings from the 2011Workplace Employment Relations Study. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

90.

Waddock

Graves

(1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 303–319.

91.

Wald

Button

Rienzo

(1996) The politics of gay rights in American communities: Explaining antidiscrimination ordinances and policies. American Journal of Political Science 40(4): 1152–1178.

92.

Wang

Schwartz

(2010) Stock price reactions to GLBT nondiscrimination policies. Human Resource Management 49(2): 195–216.

93.

Westphal

(1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 7–24.

94.

Westphal

Milton

(2000) How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(2): 366–398.

95.

Williams

O’Reilly

(1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In: Staw

Cummings

(eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 77–140.

96.

Willis

(2012) Witnesses on the periphery: Young lesbian, gay, bisexual and queer employees witnessing homophobic exchanges in Australian workplaces. Human Relations 65(12): 1589–1610.

97.

Yoder

(1994) Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly 57(2): 150–159.

98.

Zajac

Westphal

(1996) Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal 39(1): 64–90.

99.

Zhang

Hou

(2012) The romance of working together: Benefits of gender diversity on group performance in China. Human Relations 65(11): 1487–1508.