In this article, I contribute to posthumanist, actor-network influenced theories of leadership, drawing empirically on qualitative data collected at a Royal Navy shore establishment in Great Britain. I demonstrate how a fluid network of hybridized relationships between people and things affords shifting and multiple possibilities for making leadership matter. As configurations of actants evolve these affordances are altered, and the blackboxing processes hiding the material actants co-generating leadership effects are uncovered. A detailed explication of the politicized affordances within actor networks contributes to knowledge about how hybridized relationships co-enable possibilities for action that bring to life, reinforce and call into question the human-centred, gendered, colonialist web of assumptions and practices through which Royal Naval personnel understand and enact leadership.
BaradK (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs28(3): 801–831.
2.
BarrettFJ (1996) The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US Navy. Gender, Work and Organization3(3): 129–142.
3.
BathurstRCainT (2013) Embodied leadership: The aesthetics of gesture. Leadership9(3): 358–377.
4.
BathurstRJacksonBStatlerM (2010) Leading aesthetically in uncertain times. Leadership6(3): 311–330.
5.
BergAJLieM (1995) Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender?Science, Technology & Human Values20(3): 332–351.
6.
BloomfieldBPLathamYVurdubakisT (2010) Bodies, technologies and action possibilities: When is an affordance?Sociology44(3): 415–433.
7.
BraidottiR (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
BrymanA (2004) Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly15(6): 729–769.
9.
BrymanAStephensMCampoC (1996) The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly7(3): 353–370.
10.
ButlerJ (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminsm and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
11.
CarlilePRNicoliniDLangleyATsoukasH (eds) (2013) How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
CollinsonD (2005) Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations58(11): 1419–1442.
13.
CongerJA (1998) Qualitative research as the cornerstone methodology for understanding leadership. The Leadership Quarterly9(1): 107–121.
14.
CoorenF (2004) Textual agency: How texts do things in organizations. Organization11(3): 373–393.
15.
CoorenFFairhurstGTHüetR (2012) Why matter always matters in (organizational) communication. In: LeonardiPMNardiBAKallinikosJ (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technologial World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 296–314.
16.
CunliffeALEriksenM (2011) Relational leadership. Human Relations64(11): 1425–1449.
17.
FairhurstGT (2007) Discursive Leadership: In Conversation with Leadership Psychology. London: SAGE.
18.
FairhurstGTCoorenF (2009) Leadership as the hybrid production of presence(s). Leadership5(4): 469–490.
19.
FaulknerPRundeJ (2012) On sociomateriality. In: LeonardiPMNardiBAKallinikosJ (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–66.
20.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House LLC.
21.
FoxS (2000) Communities of practice: Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies37(6): 853‒867.
22.
GherardiS (2001) From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations54(1): 131–139.
23.
GibsonJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
GodfreyRLilleySBrewisJ (2012) Biceps, bitches and borgs: Reading Jarhead’s representation of the construction of the (masculine) military body. Organization Studies33(4): 541–562.
25.
Golden-BiddleKLockeK (1993) Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science4(4): 595–616.
26.
HaleHC (2012) The role of practice in the development of military masculinities. Gender, Work and Organization19(6): 699–722.
27.
HarawayDJ (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
28.
JonesM (2013) Untangling sociomateriality. In: CarlilePRNicoliniDLangleyATsoukasH (eds) How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197–226.
29.
KaptelininVNardiB (2006) Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
KüpersWM (2013) Embodied inter-practices of leadership: Phenomenological perspectives on relational and responsive leading and following. Leadership9(3): 335–357.
31.
LadkinD (2010) Rethinking Leadership: A New Look at Old Questions. Gloucester: Edward Elgar.
32.
LadkinDTaylorSS (2010) Enacting the ‘true self’: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly21(1): 64–74.
33.
LangleyASmallmanCTsoukasHVan de VenAH (2013) Process studies of change in organizational management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 1–13.
34.
LatourB (1994) On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge3(2): 29–64.
35.
LatourB (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
LawJ (2004) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
LeonardiPM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In: LeonardiPMNardiBAKallinikosJ (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
LeonardiPMNardiBAKallinikosJ (eds) (2012) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
LoweKBGardnerWL (2000) Ten years of The Leadership Quarterly: Contributions and challenges for the future. The Leadership Quarterly11(4): 459–514.
40.
MillerD (2005) Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
MillerD (2010) Stuff. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42.
MorganGSmircichL (1980) The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review5(4): 491–500.
43.
MuhrSLSullivanKR (2013) ‘None so queer as folk’: Gendered expectations and transgressive bodies in leadership. Leadership9(3): 416–435.
44.
OliverM (2005) The problem with affordance. Educational Technology and Society2(4): 402–413.
OrlikowskiWJ (2010) The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics34(1): 125–141.
47.
OrlikowskiWJScottSV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals2(1): 433–474.
48.
PetersTWatermanR (1982) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-run Corporations. New York: Warner.
49.
PickeringA (1993) The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology99(3): 559–589.
50.
PrownJD (1982) Mind in matter: An introduction to material culture theory and method. Winterthur Portfolio17(1): 1–19.
51.
PullenAVachhaniS (2013) The materiality of leadership. Leadership9(3): 315–318.
52.
RopoASauerESalovaaraP (2013) Embodiment of leadership through material place. Leadership9(3): 378–395.
53.
ScheinEH (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
SinclairA (2005) Body possibilities in leadership. Leadership1(4): 387–406.
55.
SmircichLMorganG (1982) Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science18(3): 257–273.
56.
SturmanS (2006) On black-boxing gender: Some social questions for Bruno Latour. Social Epistemology20(2): 181–184.
57.
SvenningssonSLarssonM (2006) Fantasies of leadership: Identity work. Leadership2(2): 203–224.
58.
TaylorJRVan EveryEJ (2000) The Emergent Organization: Communication as its Site and Surface. London: Routledge.
59.
ThornborrowTBrownAD (2009) ‘Being regimented’: Aspiration, discipline and identity work in the British Parachute Regiment. Organization Studies30(4): 355–376.
60.
Uhl-BienM (2006) Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly17(6): 654–676.
61.
Van MaanenJ (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly24(4): 539–550.
62.
WajcmanJ (2000) Reflections on gender and technology studies: In what state is the art?Social Studies of Science30(3): 447–464.
63.
WeickK (2012) Organized sensemaking: A commentary on processes of interpretive work. Human Relations65(1): 141–153.
64.
WhittleASpicerA (2008) Is actor network theory critique?Organization Studies29(4): 611–629.
65.
WillisPTrondmanM (2002) Manifesto for ethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies2(3): 394–402.
66.
WoodwardRJenkingsKN (2011) Military identities in the situated accounts of British Military Personnel. Sociology45(2): 252–268.
