Adopting a relational perspective, this article investigates whether organizational relationship-building routines and relational coordination influence organizational knowledge management capability and ultimately innovation in professional service firms (PSFs). Using data collected from 120 accounting firms in Ireland, support is found for an inter-mediation model where both relational coordination and knowledge management capability intervene in the relationship between relational routines and innovation. Thus, a linkage model is supported whereby relational routines facilitate relational coordination, which enhances knowledge management capability, leading to innovation. This article provides evidence of the importance of relational routines and relational coordination in promoting a firm’s knowledge management capability and in fostering innovation. Results highlight the value of relational resources in PSFs and suggest a novel and easy-to-implement approach for knowledge and innovation management.
AnandNGardnerHKMorrisT (2007) Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. The Academy of Management Journal50(2): 406–428.
2.
ArmstrongJSOvertonTS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research14(3): 396–402.
3.
BarneyJ (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17(1): 99–120.
4.
BarneyJBArikanAM (2001) The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In: HittMAFreemanREHarrisonJS (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 124–188.
5.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
6.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241–258.
7.
BurtRS (1992) Structural Holes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ChenCJHuangJW (2009) Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research62(1): 104–114.
9.
ChungSASinghHLeeK (2000) Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal21(1): 1–22.
10.
CohenMD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies28(5): 773–786.
11.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94(S1): 95–120.
12.
CorleyKGGioiaDA (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review36(1): 12–32.
13.
CramtonCD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science12(3): 346–371.
14.
CurrieGKerrinM (2003) Human resource management and knowledge management: Enhancing knowledge sharing in a pharmaceutical company. The International Journal of Human Resource Management14(6): 1027–1045.
15.
DattaDKGuthrieJPWrightPM (2005) Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter. Academy of Management Journal48(1): 135–145.
16.
DelaneyJTHuselidMA (1996) The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal39(4): 949–969.
17.
DeLongTNandaA (2003) Professional Services: Text and Cases. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
18.
DillmanDA (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide. New York: Wiley.
19.
DurbinJWatsonGS (1950) Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II. Biometrika37(3/4): 409–428.
20.
EisenhardtKMMartinJA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal21(10/11): 1105–1121.
21.
EmpsonL (2001) Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms. Human Relations54(7): 839–962.
22.
EmpsonL (2007) Managing the Modern Law Firm: New Challenges, New Perspectives. Oxford University Press, USA.
23.
FeldmanMS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science11(6): 611–629.
24.
FieldAP (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
FreidsonE (1986) Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
FuN (2013) Exploring the impact of high performance work systems in professional service firms: A practices-resources-uses-performance approach. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research65(3): 240.
28.
FuNFloodPCBosakJMorrisTO’ReganP (2013) Exploring the performance effect of high performance work system on service supply chain in professional service firms. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal18(3): 292–307.
29.
GardnerHKAnandNMorrisT (2008) Chartering new territory: Diversification, legitimacy, and practice area creation in professional service firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior29(8): 1101–1121.
30.
GardnerHK (2012a) Coming through when it matters most. Harvard Business Review90(4): 83–91.
31.
GardnerHK (2012b) Performance pressure as a double-edged sword enhancing team motivation but undermining the use of team knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly57(1): 1–46.
32.
GardnerHKGinoFStaatsBR (2012) Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal55(4): 998–1022.
33.
GerhartBWrightPMMahanGSnellSA (2000) Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates?Personnel Psychology53(4): 803–834.
34.
GittellJH (2001) Supervisory span, relational coordination, and flight departure performance: A reassessment of postbureaucracy theory. Organization Science12(4): 468–483.
35.
GittellJH (2002a) Relational coordination: Coordinating work through relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies: A Research Companion4(4): 299–311.
36.
GittellJH (2002b) Coordinating mechanisms in care providers groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science48(11): 1408–1426.
37.
GittellJH (2006) Relational coordination: Coordinating work through relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. In:Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies: A Research Companion. London: Edward Elgar, 74–94.
38.
GittellJHFairfieldKMBierbaumB. (2000) Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: A nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Medical Care38(8): 807–819.
39.
GittellJHWeinbergDBBennettALMillerJA (2008) Is the doctor in? A relational approach to job design and the coordination of work. Human Resource Management47(4): 729–755.
40.
GittellJHSeidnerRWimbushJ (2010) A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organization Science21(2): 490–506.
41.
GlickWH (1985) Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review10(3): 601–616.
GrantAM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE32(2): 393–417.
44.
GrantRM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal17: 109–122.
45.
GreenwoodRHiningsCRBrownJ (1990) ‘P2-form’ strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. The Academy of Management Journal33(4): 725–755.
46.
GreenwoodRLiSXPrakashRDeephouseDL (2005) Reputation, diversification, and organizational explanations of performance in professional service firms. Organization Science16(6): 661–673.
47.
GuthrieJP (2001) High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal44(1): 180–190.
48.
HaanCT (2002) Statistical Methods in Hydrology. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press.
49.
HaasMRHansen MortenT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal28(11): 1133–1153.
50.
HackmanJROldhamGR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology60(2): 159–170.
51.
HansenMTNohriaNTierneyT (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard Business Review77(2): 106–116.
52.
HayesAF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs76(4): 408–420.
53.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
54.
HayesAFPreacherKJMyersTA (2011) Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In:Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques. New York: Routledge, 434–465.
55.
HittMABiermanLUhlenbruckKShimizuK (2006) The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. The Academy of Management Journal49(6): 1137–1157.
56.
HofmannDAGriffinMAGavinMB (2000) The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 467–511.
57.
HuselidMA (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal38(3): 635–672.
58.
JamesLR (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology67(2): 219–229.
59.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology69(1): 85–98.
60.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1993) rWG: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology78(2): 306–309.
61.
JanssenO (2001) Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal44(5): 1039–1050.
62.
KelloggKCOrlikowskiWJYatesJ (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science17(1): 22–44.
63.
LeanaCRRousseauDM (2000) Relational Wealth: The Advantages of Stability in a Changing Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
LeBretonJMSenterJL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods11(4): 815–852.
65.
LevittBMarchJG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology14(1): 319–338.
LiaoHToyaKLepakDPHongY (2009) Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology94(2): 371–391.
68.
LinN (2001) Building a network theory of social capital. In: LinNCookKBurtRS (eds) Social Capital: Theory and Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction, 3–29.
69.
LøwendahlBR (2000) Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms. Copenhagen, Denmark: Handelshojskolens Forlag.
70.
McGrawKOWongSP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods1(1): 30–46.
71.
MaisterD (1993) Managing the Professional Service Firm. New York: Free Press.
72.
MathieuJEDeShonRPBerghDD (2008) Mediational inferences in organizational research then, now, and beyond. Organizational Research Methods11(2): 203–223.
73.
MorrisSSSnellSA (2008) The value of knowledge for professional service workers: A use value perspective. Presented at a conference on HRM and Knowledge Related Performance, September 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark.
74.
MorrisT (2001) Asserting property rights: Knowledge codification in the professional service firm. Human Relations54(7): 819–838.
75.
MorrisTEmpsonL (1998) Organization and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting and consulting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society23(5): 609–624.
76.
MorrisTGardnerHKAnandN (2007) It’s not what we do it’s how we do it: Private equity’s impact on professional advisors. Presented at Clifford Chance Conference on Professional Service Firms, University of Illinois, Chicago.
77.
MuellerFDyersonR (1999) Expert humans or expert organizations?Organization Studies20(2): 225–256.
78.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
79.
NelsonRRWinterSG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
80.
NonakaITakeuchiH (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
81.
ParmigianiAHoward-GrenvilleJ (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals5(1): 413–453.
82.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-YPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
83.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology63: 539–569.
84.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers36(4): 717–731.
85.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
86.
PriemRLButlerJE (2001) Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?Academy of Management Review26(1): 22–40.
87.
PutnamR (1993) The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect13: 35–42.
88.
RobertsonMScarbroughHSwanJ (2003) Knowledge creation in professional service firms: Institutional effects. Organization Studies24(6): 831–857.
89.
ScarbroughH (2003) Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation process. International Journal of Manpower24(5): 501–516.
90.
ShapiraZ (2011) ‘I’ve got a theory paper—do you?’: Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organization Science22(5): 1312–1321.
91.
SirmonDGHittMAIrelandRD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review32(1): 273–292.
92.
SobelME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: LeinhardtS (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 290–312.
93.
StarbuckWH (1992) Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies29(6): 713–740.
94.
StumpfSADohJPClarkKD (2002) Professional services firms in transition: Challenges and opportunities for improving performance. Organizational Dynamics31(3): 259–279.
95.
SubramaniamMYoundtMA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal48(3): 450–463.
96.
SwartJKinnieN (2010) Organizational learning, knowledge assets and HR practices in professional service firms. Human Resource Management Journal20(1): 64–79.
97.
TeeceDJ (2003) Expert talent and the design of (professional services) firms. Industrial and Corporate Change12(4): 895–916.
ThompsonJD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
100.
TurnerNMaylorHSwartJ (2013) Ambidexterity in managing business projects – an intellectual capital perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business6(2): 379–389.
101.
Uhl-BienM (2006) Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly17(6): 654–676.
102.
VandeVenAH (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science32(5): 590–607.
103.
Von NordenflychtA (2007) Is public ownership bad for professional service firms? Ad agency ownership, performance, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal50(2): 429–445.
104.
Von NordenflychtA (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge intensive firms. Academy of Management Review35(1): 155–174.
