An expanding institutionalist literature on professional service firms (PSFs) emphasizes that these are ridden by contradictions, paradoxes and conflicting logics. More specifically, literature looking at PSFs in a global context has highlighted how these contradictions prevent firms from becoming truly global in nature. What it takes to make partner in the Big 4 is at the core of such interrogations because partners belong to global firms yet are promoted at the national level. We undertake a cross-country comparison of partner promotion processes in Big 4 PSFs in Canada, France, Spain and the UK. Synthesizing existing institutionalist work with Bourdieusian theory, our results suggest that PSFs in different countries resemble each other very closely in terms of the requirements demanded of their partners. Although heterogeneity can be observed in the way in which different forms of capital are converted into each other, we show there is an overall homogeneity in that economic capital hurdles are the most significant, if not the sole, set of criteria upon which considerations of partnership admissions are based.
Accountancy Age (2013) PwC’s Powell takes home £3.6m. 9September.
2.
AdlerPSKwonS-W (2013) The mutation of professionalism as a contested diffusion process: Clinical guidelines as carriers of institutional change in medicine. Journal of Management Studies50(5): 930–962.
3.
Anderson-GoughFGreyCRobsonK (2000) In the name of the client: The service ethic in two professional service firms. Human Relations53(9): 1151–1174.
4.
Anderson-GoughFGreyCRobsonK (2006) Professionals, networking and the networked professional. Research in the Sociology of Organizations24: 231–256.
5.
ArnoldP (2005) Disciplining domestic regulation: The World Trade Organization and the market for professional services. Accounting, Organizations and Society30: 299–330.
6.
BarrettMCooperDJJamalK (2005) Globalization and the coordinating of work in multinational audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society30: 1–24.
7.
BourdieuP (1979) La distinction. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
8.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 241–258.
9.
BourdieuP (1996) The Rules of Art. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
BourdieuP (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
BourdieuP (2012) La fabrique des débats publics. Le Monde diplomatique. January.
12.
BourdieuPPasseronR (1964) Les héritiers. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
13.
BourdieuPWacquantLJD (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
BoussebaaM (2009) Struggling to organize across national borders: The case of global resource management in professional service firms. Human Relations62(6): 829–850.
15.
BoussebaaMMorganGSturdyA (2012) Constructing global firms? National, transnational and neocolonial effects in international management consultancies. Organization Studies33(4): 465–486.
16.
BriscoeFvon NordenflychtA (2014) Which path to power? Workplace networks and the relative effectiveness of inheritance and rainmaking strategies for professional partners. Journal of Professions and Organization 1(1): 33–48.
17.
CleggS (2010) The state, power, and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory?Journal of Management Inquiry19(1): 4–13.
18.
CookACGFaulconbridgeJRMuzioD (2012) London’s legal elite: Recruitment through cultural capital and the reproduction of social exclusivity in City professional service fields. Environment and Planning A44(7): 1744–1762.
19.
CooperDJRobsonK (2006) Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating sites of professionalization. Accounting, Organizations and Society31(4/5): 415–444.
20.
CooperDJEzzamelMWillmottH (2008) Examining ‘institutionalisation’: A critical theoretic perspective. In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinKSuddabyR (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE, 673–701.
21.
CovaleskiMADirsmithMWHeianJBSamuelS (1998) The calculated and the disavowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly43: 293–327.
22.
CovaleskiMADirsmithMWRittenbergL (2003) Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: The institutionalization of the global knowledge expert. Accounting, Organizations and Society28(4): 323–355.
23.
D’IribarneP (1989) La logique de l’honneur. Gestion des entreprises et traditions nationales. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
24.
DezalayYGarthBG (2004) The confrontation between the Big Five and Big Law: Turf battles and ethical debates as contests for professional credibility. Law and Social Inquiry29(3): 615–638.
25.
DiMaggioP (1982) Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status-culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review47(2): 189–201.
26.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1991) Introduction. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–38.
27.
FaulconbridgeJRMuzioD (2007) Reinserting the professional into the study of globalizing professional service firms: The case of law. Global Networks7(3): 249–270.
28.
FernerAEdwardsPSissonK (1995) Coming unstuck? In search of the ‘corporate glue’ in an international professional service firm. Human Resource Management34(3): 343–361.
29.
FernerAAlmondPClarkI. (2004) The dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources: Case study evidence from US MNCs in the UK. Organization Studies25(3): 363–391.
30.
FernerAEdwardsTTempelA (2011) Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals. Human Relations65(2): 163–187.
31.
FligsteinNMcAdamD (2011) Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory29(1): 1–26.
32.
FligsteinNMcAdamD (2012) A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
GendronY (2001) The difficult client-acceptance decision in Canadian audit firms: A field investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research18(2): 283–310.
34.
GendronY (2002) On the role of the organization in auditors’ client-acceptance decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society27: 659–684.
35.
GoJ (2008) Global fields and imperial forms: Field theory and the British and American empires. Sociological Theory26(3): 201–229.
36.
GreenwoodRSuddabyR (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal49(1): 27–48.
37.
HaynesK (2012) Body beautiful? Gender, identity and the body in professional services firms. Gender, Work & Organization 19(5): 489–507.
38.
HeinzJLaumannE (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and American Bar Foundation.
39.
JewelL (2008) Bourdieu and American legal education: How law schools reproduce social stratification and class hierarchy. Buffalo Law Review56: 1155–1224.
40.
KayFMHaganJ (1998) Raising the bar: The gender stratification of law firm capital. American Sociological Review63(5): 728–743.
41.
KornbergerMJustesenLMouritsenJ (2011) ‘When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you’: An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 accounting firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society36(8): 514–533.
42.
KostovaT (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices. Academy of Management Review24: 308–324.
43.
KurunmakiL (1999) Professional vs. financial capital in the field of health care: Struggles for the redistribution of power and control. Accounting, Organizations and Society24(2): 95–124.
44.
LamontM (1992) Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
LanderMKoeneBASLinssenS (2013) Committed to professionalism: Organizational responses of mid-tier accounting firms to conflicting institutional logics. Accounting Organizations and Society38(2): 130–148.
46.
LecaBNaccacheP (2006) A critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization13: 627–651.
47.
LevyDScullyM (2007) The institutional entrepreneur as modern Prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies28: 971–991.
48.
MacleanMHarveyCChiaR (2010) Dominant corporate agents and the power elite in France and Britain. Organization Studies31: 327–348.
49.
MalschBGendronY (2013) Re-theorizing change: Institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies50(5): 870–899.
50.
MorganGQuackS (2005) Institutional legacies and firm dynamics: The growth and internationalization of UK and German law firms. Organization Studies26: 1765–1785.
MuellerFLoveridgeR (1995) The second industrial divide? The role of the large firm in the Baden-Wurttemberg model. Industrial and Corporate Change4(3): 555–582.
53.
MuzioDFaulconbridgeJ (2013) The global professional service firm: ‘One firm’ models versus (Italian) distant institutionalized practices. Organization Studies34(7): 897–925.
54.
MuzioDBrockDMSuddabyR (2013) Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of Management Studies50(5): 699–721.
55.
OakesLTownleyBCooperD (1998) Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly43(2): 257–292.
56.
PinningtonAHGrayJT (2007) The global restructuring of legal services work? A study of the internationalisation of Australian law firms. International Journal of the Legal Profession14(2): 147–172.
57.
RamirezC (2012) How Big Four audit firms control standard-setting in accounting and auditing. In: HuaultIRichardC (eds) Finance: The Discreet Regulator. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
ReganMCJr (2005) Eat What You Kill: The Fall of a Wall Street Lawyer. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
59.
SavageMWardeADevineF (2005) Capitals, assets and resources: Some critical issues. British Journal of Sociology56(1): 31–47.
60.
SchinkelWNoordegraafM (2011) Professionalism as symbolic capital: Materials for a Bourdieusian theory of professionalism. Comparative Sociology10: 67–96.
61.
SmithCMeiksinsP (1995) System, society and dominance effects in cross-national organisational analysis. Work, Employment & Society9(2): 241–267.
62.
SuddabyRCooperDJGreenwoodR (2007) Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics or field level organizational change. Accounting, Organizations and Society32: 333–362.
63.
WalkerJTBrewsterCWoodG (2014) Diversity between and within varieties of capitalism: Transnational survey evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change23(2): 493–533.
64.
WhittleACarterCMuellerF (in press) ‘Above the fray’: Interests, discourse and legitimacy in the audit field. Critical Perspectives on Accounting.
65.
WillmottH (2011) ‘Institutional work’ for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry20(1): 67–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
