This article presents a study of the degree to which national institutional settings impact on the application of management practices in foreign subsidiaries of multinational companies. Applying the national business systems approach our study centres on the use of calculative human resource management (HRM) practices by subsidiaries of US multinational companies in the UK, Ireland, Germany, Denmark/Norway and Australia, respectively, in comparison with these countries’ indigenous firms.The analysis indicates that while US subsidiaries adapt to the local setting in terms of applying calculative HRM practices, they also diverge from indigenous firm practices.
Albert, M.Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil , 1991.
2.
Barry, M. & Wailes, N.Contrasting systems? 100 years of arbitration in Australia and New Zealand . Journal of Industrial Relations, 2004, 46(4), 430-447 .
3.
Bévort, F. , Pedersen, J. S. & Sundbo, J.Denmark. In I. Brunstein (Ed.), Human resource management in Western Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter , 1995, pp. 31-58.
4.
Bolkestein, F.The Dutch model . The Economist, 1999, 351(8120), 115-116 .
5.
Brewster, C. , Hegewisch, A. , Mayne, L. & Tregaskis, O.Methodology of the Price Waterhouse Cranfield Project. In C. Brewster & A. Hegewisch (Eds), Policy and practice in European human resource management. London: Routledge , 1994, pp. 230-245.
6.
Brewster, C. , Tregaskis, O. , Hegewisch, A. & Mayne, L.Comparative research in human research management: A review and an example . International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1996, 7, 585-604 .
7.
Dabscheck, B.Arbitration and relations between the parties . Journal of Industrial Relations, 2004, 46(4), 385-399 .
8.
DiMaggio, P. J.State expansion and organization fields. In R. H. Hall & R. E. Quinn (Eds), Organization theory and public policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage , 1983, pp. 147-161.
9.
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields . American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 147-160 .
10.
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W.Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1991, pp. 1-38.
11.
Dobbin, F. , Sutton, J. R. , Meyer, J. W. & Scott, W. R.Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets . American Journal of Sociology, 1993, 99(2), 396-427 .
12.
Edwards, T. & Ferner, A.The renewed ‘American challenge’: A review of employment practices in US multinationals . Paper presented at the 50th Universities Industrial Relations Association’s Annual Conference, Warwick, 7-9 July 2000.
13.
Edwards, P. , Hall, M. , Hyman, R. , Marginson, P. , Sisson, K. , Waddington, J. & Winchester, D.Great Britain: Still muddling through. In A. Ferner & R. Hyman (Eds), Industrial relations in the new Europe. Oxford: Blackwell , 1992, pp. 1-68.
14.
Ferner, A.Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational corporations . Human Resource Management, 1997, 7(1), 19-37 .
15.
Ferner, A. The embeddedness of US multinational companies in the US business system: Implications for HR/IR, Occasional Paper 61, December 2000.
16.
Ferner, A.Foreign multinationals and industrial relations innovations in Britain. In P. Edwards (Ed.), Industrial relations: Theory and practice, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell , 2003, pp. 81-103.
17.
Ferner, A. , Almond, P. , Clark, I. , Colling, T. , Edwards, T. , Holden, L. & Muller-Camen, M.The dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources: Case study evidence from US MNCs in the UK . Organization Studies, 2004, 25(3), 363-391 .
18.
Geppert, M.Learning and knowledge sharing in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison . Conference Paper, Second Annual EURAM Conference on Innovative Research in Management, Stockholm, 9-11 May 2002.
19.
Geppert, M. , Matten, D. & Williams, K.Global change management approaches in MNCs and distinct national trajectories: Britain and Germany compared. In M. Geppert , D. Matten & K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for human resource management in a global context. Basingstoke: Palgrave , 2002, pp. 42-67.
20.
Geppert, M. , Matten, D. & Williams, K.Change management in MNCs: How global convergence intertwines with national diversities . Human Relations, 2003, 56(7), 807-838 .
21.
Gooderham, P. , Nordhaug, O. & Ringdal, K.When in Rome, do they do as the Romans? HRM practices of US subsidiaries in Europe . Management International Review, 1998, 38(2), 47-64 .
22.
Gooderham, P. N. , Nordhaug, O. & Ringdal, K.Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44, 507-531 .
23.
Graver, H. P.Reguleringsmodeller i arbeidsretten [Regulatory models in labor law]. In D. Olberg (Ed.), Endringer i arbeidslivets organisering [Changes in the organization of work life]. Oslo: Fafo , 1995, pp. 131-153.
24.
Gulati, R.Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation . Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(5), 397-420 .
25.
Gunnigle, P. & McGuire, D.Why Ireland? A qualitative review of the factors influencing the location of US multinationals in Ireland with particular reference to the impact of labour issues . Economic and Social Review, 2001, 32, 43-67 .
26.
Gunnigle, P. , Morley, M. & Turner, T.Challenging collectivist traditions: Individualism and the management of industrial relations in greenfield sites . Economic and Social Review, 1997, 28, 105-134 .
27.
Gunnigle, P. , O’Sullivan, M. & Kinsella, M.Organised labour in the new economy: Trade unions and public policy in the Republic of Ireland. In D. D’Art & T. Turner (Eds), Irish employment relations in the new economy. Dublin: Blackhall Press , 2002, pp. 222-258.
28.
Hall, P. A. & Gingerich, D. W.Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy. MPIfG Discussion paper 04/5, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Berlin , 2004.
29.
Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D. (Eds). Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2001.
30.
Hall, P. A. & Sockice, D.Varieties of capitalism and institutional change: A response to three critics . Comparative European Politics, 2003, 1, 241-250 .
31.
Harzing, A. W. K.Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: International strategy and management of entry modes . Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(3), 211-227 .
32.
Harzing, A. W. K. & Sorge, A.The relative impact of country origin and universal contingencies on internationalization strategies and corporate control in multinational enterprises: Worldwide and European perspectives . Organization Studies, 2003, 24(2), 187-214 .
33.
Hassel, A.The erosion of industrial relations in Germany . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1999, 37(3), 483-505 .
34.
Hitt, M. , Ahlstrom, D. , Dacin, M. T. , Levitas, E. & Svobodina, L.The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia . Organization Science, 2004, 15(2), 173-185 .
35.
Hollingsworth, J. R.Continuities and changes in social systems of production: The cases of Japan, Germany, and the United States. In J. R. Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (Eds), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press , 1997, pp. 265-310.
36.
Hollingsworth, J. R. , Schmitter, P. & Streeck, W.Governing capitalist economies: Performance and control of economic sectors. New York: Oxford University Press , 1993.
37.
Klikauer, T.Stability in Germany’s industrial relations: A critique on Hassel’s erosion thesis . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2002, 40(2), 295-308 .
38.
Kostova, T. & Roth, K.Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects . Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(1), 215-233 .
39.
Kristensen, P. H.Strategies against structures: Institutions and economic organizations in Denmark. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems. London: Sage , 1992, pp. 117-136.
40.
Lane, C.Industrial order: Britain, Germany and France. In R. Hyman and A. Ferner (Eds), New frontiers in European Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell , 1994, pp. 167-195.
41.
Mabey, C. & Iles, P.Human resource management in the UK: A case of fundamental change, facelift or façade? In T. Clark (Ed.), European human resource management. Oxford: Blackwell , 1996, pp. 34-64.
42.
Maurice, M. & Sorge, A. (Eds). Embedding organizations: Societal analysis of actors, organizations, and socio-economic content. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins , 2000.
43.
Mayer, M. & Whittington, R.For boundedness in the study of comparative and international business: The case of the diversified multidivisional corporation. In M. Geppert , D. Matten & K. Williams (Eds), Challenges for human resource management in a global context. Basingstoke: Palgrave , 2002, pp. 19-41.
44.
McNamara, G. , Deephouse, D. L. & Luce, R.Competitive positioning within and across a strategic group structure: The performance of core, secondary, and solitary firms . Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 24(2), 161-181 .
45.
Molenaar, I. W. & Sijtsma, K.MSP5 for Windows, user’s manual. A program for Mokken Scale Analysis for polychotomous items. Groningen, The Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA , 2000.
46.
Myloni, B. , Harzing, A. W. K. & Mirza, H.Host country specific factors and the transfer of human resource management practices in multinational companies . International Journal of Manpower, 2004, 25(6), 518-534 .
Peng, M. W.Perspectives-From China strategy to global strategy . Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2005, 22(2), 123-141 .
49.
Peng, M. W. , Lee, S.-H. & Wang, D. Y. L.What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness . Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(3), 622-633 .
50.
Pieper, R. (Ed.). Human resource management: An international comparison. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter , 1990.
51.
Piore, M. & Sabel, C.The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books , 1984.
52.
Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1991.
53.
Pugh, D. S. & Hickson, D. J.Organizational structure in its context: The Aston Programme I. Lexington, MA: Heath , 1969.
54.
Richbell, S.Trends and emerging values in human resource management-The UK scene . International Journal of Manpower, 2002, 22(3), 261-268 .
55.
Rubery, J. & Wilkinson, F.Employer strategy and the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1994.
56.
Scholz, C.Human resource management in Germany. In T. Clark (Ed.), European human resource management. Oxford: Blackwell , 1996, pp. 118-155.
57.
Schuler, R. S. & Rogovsky, N.Understanding compensation practice variations across firms: The impact of national culture . Journal of International Business Studies, 1998, 29(1), 159-177 .
58.
Scott, W. R.Institutions and organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage , 1995.
59.
Scott, W. R.Organizations. Rational, natural, and open systems, 4th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall , 1998.
60.
Sijtsma, K. & Molenaar, I. W.Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. London: Sage , 2002.
61.
Sorge, A.Cross national differences in human resources and organizations. In A. W. K. Harzing & J. van Ruysseveldt (Eds), International human resource management, 2nd edn.London: Sage , 2004, pp. 99-123.
62.
Sparrow, P. & Hiltrop, M.European human resource management in transition. New York: Prentice Hall , 1994.
63.
Streeck, W.The German economic model: Does it exist? Can it survive? In C. Crouch & W. Streeck (Eds), Political economy of modern capitalism: Mapping convergence and diversity. London: Sage , 1997, pp. 33-54.
64.
Tichy, N. M. , Fombrun, C. J. & Devanna, M. A.The organizational context of strategic human resource management. In C. J. Fombrun , N. M. Tichy & M. A. Devanna (Eds), Strategic human resource management. New York: Wiley , 1984, pp. 403-419.
65.
Wächter, H. & Müller-Camen, M.Co-determination and strategic integration in German firms . Human Resource Management Journal, 2002, 12(3), 76-87 .
66.
Wächter, H. & Stengelhofen, T.Germany. In I. Brunstein (Ed.), Human resource management in Western Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter , 1995, pp. 89-112.
67.
Weinstein, M. & Kochan, T.The limits of diffusion: Recent developments in industrial relations and human resource practices in the United States. In R. Locke , T. Kochan & M. Piore (Eds), Employment relations in a changing world economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 1995, pp. 1-32.
68.
Whitley, R. (Ed.). European business systems. London: Sage , 1992.
69.
Whitley, R.Divergent capitalisms. The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1999.
