The present study of 60,470 women and men examined evaluations of participants’ current managers as well as their preferences for male and female managers, in general. A cross-sex bias emerged in the ratings of one’s current boss, where men judged their female bosses more favorably and women judged male bosses more favorably. The quality of relationships between subordinates and managers were the same for competent male and female managers. A small majority (54%) of participants claimed to have no preference for the gender of their boss, but the remaining participants reported preferring male over female bosses by more than a 2:1 ratio. Qualitative analysis of the participants’ justifications for this preference are presented, and results are discussed within the framework of role congruity theory.
AymanRKorabikKMorrisS (2009) Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates devaluation of female transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology39(4): 852–879.
2.
ByronK (2007) Male and female managers’ ability to ‘read’ emotions: Relationships with supervisor’s performance ratings and subordinates’ satisfaction ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology80(4): 713–733.
3.
CarlsonDKacmarMWhittenD (2006) What men think about executive women. Harvard Business Review84(9): 28–29.
CohenJ (1969) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1st Edition). New York: Academic Press.
7.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CohenJ (1990) Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist45(12): 1304–1312.
9.
CooperV (1997) Homophily or the queen bee syndrome: Female evaluation of female leadership. Small Group Research28(4): 483–499.
10.
DasguptaNAsgariS (2004) Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology40(5): 642–658.
11.
DeutschFM (2007) Undoing gender. Gender and Society21(1): 106–127.
12.
DiekmanABEaglyAH (2000) Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26(10): 1171–1188.
13.
EaglyAHKarauSJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109(3): 573–598.
14.
EaglyAHKarauSMakhijaniM (1995) Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin117(1): 125–145.
15.
EaglyAHMakhijaniMGKlonskyBG (1992) Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A metanalysis. Psychological Bulletin111(1): 3–22.
16.
EllemersNVan den HeuvelHDe GilderDMaassABonviniA (2004) The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?The British Journal of Social Psychology43(3): 315–338.
17.
FiskeST (1998) Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In: GilbertDTFiskeSTLindzeyG (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill, 357–414.
18.
FondasN (1997) Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review22(2): 257–282.
19.
Garcia-RetameroRLópez-ZafraE (2006) Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles55(1–2): 51–61.
20.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
21.
GlickPFiskeST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(3): 491–512.
22.
GoslingSDVazireSSrivastavaSJohnOP (2004) Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist59(2): 93–104.
23.
HeilmanME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues57(4): 657–674.
24.
HeilmanMEBlockCJMartellR (1995) Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers?Journal of Social Behavior and Personality10(6): 237–252.
25.
HeilmanMEWallenASFuchsDTamkinsMM (2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 416–427.
26.
HelgesenS (1990) The Female Advantage: Women’s Ways of Leadership. New York: Doubleday.
27.
HydeJS (1994) Can meta-analysis make feminist transformations in psychology?Psychology of Women Quarterly18(4): 451–462.
28.
JohnsonSKMurphySEZewdieSReichardRJ (2008) The strong sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes106(1): 39–60.
29.
LipsHM (2008) Sex and Gender: An Introduction, 6th edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
LynessKJudieschMK (1999) Are women more likely to be hired or promoted into management positions?Journal of Vocational Behavior54(1): 158–173.
31.
MartellRF (1991) Sex bias at work: The effects of attentional and memory demands on performance ratings of men and women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology21(23): 1939–1960.
NederhofAJ (1985) Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology15(3): 263–280.
34.
NorrisJMWylieAM (1995) Gender stereotyping of the managerial role among students in Canada and the United States. Group & Organization Management20(2): 167–182.
35.
Parks-StammEJHeilmanMEHearnsKA (2008) Motivated to penalize: Strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34(2): 237–247.
RoseGLStoneTJ (1978) Why good job performance may (not) be rewarded: Sex factors and career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior12(2): 197–207.
38.
RosenerJB (1995) America’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
RudmanLA (1998) Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(3): 629–645.
40.
ScheinVE (1975) Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology60(3): 340–344.
41.
SchiemanSMcMullenT (2008) Relational demography in the workplace and health: An analysis of gender and the subordinate-superordinate role-set. Journal of Health and Social Behavior49(3): 286–300.
42.
StainesGTavrisCJayaratneTE (1974) The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today7(1): 55–60.
TanL (2007) The new rules of engagement. ELLE260: 272–273.
45.
TaylorSNHoodJN (2010) It may not be what you think: Gender differences in predicting emotional and social competence. Human Relations64(5): 627–652.
46.
TomkiewiczJAdeyemi-BelloT (1995) A cross-sectional analysis of attitudes of Nigerians and Americans toward women as managers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality10(6): 189–198.
