New institutionalist studies of human resource management in multinational companies argue that subsidiaries are faced with institutional duality-pressures to conform to parent company practices and to the local institutional environment in which they are based. To date, they have concentrated on how subsidiaries respond to parent company pressures. This article considers how subsidiary management responds to both parent company demands and host country pressures in trying to reconcile the challenges of institutional duality. It focuses on how such responses are shaped by the interdependence of subsidiary management with the parent company and the local environment. It does so by comparing case study evidence of collective representation practices in US-owned subsidiaries in Britain and Germany.
Aldrich, H.Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall , 1979.
2.
Almond, P. & Ferner, A. (Eds). American multinationals in Europe: Managing employment relations across national borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2006.
3.
Bartlett, C. & Ghoshal, S.Managing across borders. London: Hutchinson , 1989.
4.
Birkinshaw, J.Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In A. Rugman & T. Brewer (Eds), Oxford handbook of international business. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2003, pp. 380-401.
5.
Birkinshaw, J. & Hood, N.Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies . Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23, 773-795 .
6.
Coller, X.Managing flexibility in the food industry: A cross-national comparative case study in European multinational companies . European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1996, 2, 153-172 .
7.
Cully, M. , Woodland, S. , O’Reilly, A. & Dix, G.Britain at work. London: Routledge , 1999.
8.
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields . American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 147-160 .
9.
Edwards, P. K.Industrial relations: Theory and practice. Oxford: Blackwell , 2003.
10.
Edwards, T. & Ferner, A.The renewed ‘American challenge’: A review of employment practice in US multinationals . Industrial Relations Journal, 2002, 33, 94-111 .
11.
Ferner, A.The embeddedness of US multinational companies in the US business system: Implications for HR/IR. Occasional Paper 61, De Montfort University, Leicester , 2000a.
12.
Ferner, A.The underpinnings of ‘bureaucratic control systems’: HRM in European multinationals . Journal of Management Studies, 2000b, 37, 521-540 .
13.
Ferner, A. , Almond, P. & Colling, T.US multinationals, competitive advantage and the diffusion of HR policy: The case of workforce ‘diversity’ . Journal of International Business Studies, 2005a, 36, 304-321 .
14.
Ferner, A. , Almond, P. , Colling, T. & Edwards, T.Policies on union representation in US multinationals in the UK: Between micro-politics and macro-institutions . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2005b, 43(4), 703-728 .
15.
Geppert, M. , Williams, K. & Matten, D.The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice . Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40, 617-641 .
16.
Gooderham, P. , Nordhaug, O. & Ringdal, K.Institutional context and HRM: US subsidiaries in Europe. In F. McDonald , M. Mayer & T. Buck (Eds), The process of internationalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave , 2004, pp. 135-148.
17.
Gupta, A. & Govindarajan, V.Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations . Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16, 768-792 .
18.
Hall, P. & Gingerich, D.Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy: An empirical analysis. MPIFG Discussion Paper 04/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne , 2004.
19.
Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D.An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds), Varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2001, pp. 1-68.
20.
Hassel, A.The erosion of the German system of industrial relations . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1999, 37, pp. 483-505 .
Hollingsworth, J. R.The institutional embeddedness of American capitalism. In C. Crouch & W. Streeck (Eds), Political economy of modern capitalism. London: Sage , 1997, pp. 133-147.
23.
Jacoby, S.American exceptionalism revisited: The importance of management. In S. Jacoby (Ed.), Masters to managers. Historical and comparative perspectives on American employers. New York: Columbia University Press , 1991, pp. 173-200.
24.
Jacoby, S.Modern manors. Welfare capitalism since the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press , 1997.
25.
Jain, H. , Lawler, J. & Morishima, M.Multinational corporations, human resources management and host country nationals . International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1998, 9, 553-566 .
26.
Katz, H.The causes and consequences of increased within-country variance in employment practices . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2005, 43, 577-583 .
27.
Katz. H. & Darbishire, O.Converging divergences: Worldwide changes in employment systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press , 2000.
28.
Kochan, T. , Katz, H. & McKersie, R.The transformation of American industrial relations. Ithaca, NY: ILR/Cornell University Press , 1994.
29.
Kohaut, S. & Schnabel, C.Zur Erosion des Flächentarifvertrages: Ausmaß, Einflussfaktoren und Gegenmaßnahmen . Industrielle Beziehungen, 2003, 10, 193-219 .
30.
Kostova, T.Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective . Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24, 308-324 .
31.
Kostova, T. & Roth, K.Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects . Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45, 215-233 .
32.
Kostova, T. & Zaheer, S.Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise . Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24, 64-81 .
33.
Kotthoff, H. Betriebsräte und Bürgerstatus. Wandel und Kontinuität betrieblicher Mitbestimmung. Munich: Campus Verlag, 1994.
34.
Kristensen, P. & Zeitlin, J.Local players in global games: The strategic constitution of a multinational corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2005.
35.
Lane, C.Industry and society in Europe. Stability and change in Britain, Germany and France. Aldershot: Edward Elgar , 1995.
36.
Lane, C.European companies between globalization and localization: A comparison of internationalization strategies of British and German MNCs . Economy and Society, 1998, 27, 462-485 .
37.
Maurice, M. & Sorge, A.Embedding organizations. Societal analysis of actors, organizations and socio-economic context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 2000.
38.
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B.Institutionalized organizations . American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83, 340-363 .
39.
Mueller, F. & Purcell, J.The Europeanisation of manufacturing and the decentralisation of bargaining: Multinational management strategies in the European automobile industry . International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1992, 3, 15-34 .
40.
Oliver, C.Strategic responses to institutional processes . Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16, 145-179 .
41.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R.The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row , 1987.
42.
Quintanilla, J. & Ferner, A.Multinationals and human resource management: Between global convergence and national identity . International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2003, 14, 363-368 .
43.
Rosenzweig, P. M. & Nohria, N.Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations . Journal of International Business Studies, 1994, 25, 229-251 .
44.
Rosenzweig, P. M. & Singh, J. V.Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise . Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16, 340-361 .
45.
Schuler, R. , Dowling, P. & De Cieri, H.An integrative framework of strategic international human resource management . International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1993, 1, 717-764 .
46.
Stewart, R. , Barsoux, J. L. , Kieser, A. , Ganter, H. D. & Walgenbach, P.Managing in Britain and Germany. London: Macmillan , 1994.
47.
Streeck, W. & Rehder, B.Der Flächentarifvertrag: Krise, Stabilität und Wandel . Industrielle Beziehungen, 2003, 10, 341-362 .
48.
Taylor, S. , Beechler, S. & Napier, N.Toward an integrative model of strategic international human resource management . Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21, 959-985 .
49.
Tempel, A. , Wächter, H. & Walgenbach, P.The comparative institutional approach to HRM in MNCs-contributions, limitations and future potential. In M. Geppert & M. Mayer (Eds), Global, national and local practices in multinational companies. Hound-mills: Macmillan , 2006, pp. 17-37.
50.
Towers, B.The representation gap: Change and reform in the British and American workplace. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1997.
51.
Wächter, H.Mitbestimmung. Politische Forderung und betriebliche Reaktion. Munich: Verlag Vahlen , 1983.
52.
Wächter, H. & Peters, R. (Eds). Personalpolitik amerikanischer Unternehmen in Europa. Munich: Hampp, 2004.
53.
Waddington, J. & Hoffmann, R.Trade unions in Europe: Reform, organization and restructuring. In J. Waddington & R. Hoffmann (Eds), Trade unions in Europe: Facing challenges and searching for solutions. Brussels: ETUI , 2000, pp. 27-79.
54.
Whitley, R.Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1999.
55.
Yin, R.Case study research, 2nd edn.London: Sage , 1994.
