Using survey data from a UK fire service, this article examines the antecedents of members’ intent to participate in their union. The authors identify three dimensions of intent to participate – in rankandfile activities, in militant activitiesand in standing for union office. Affective union commitment is the main direct determinant of all three. Affective union commitment itself reflects solidaristic prounion beliefs and instrumental union commitment, providing some support for interactionist and rational choice theories. There is also evidence of frustration–aggression effects, with perceived industrial relations climate and pay equity having negative direct effects on intent to participate. Perceived industrial relations climate moderates none of these relationships. Implications for union strategy and renewal are discussed.
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M.Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
2.
Aryee, S. & Chay, Y.W.Workplace justice, citizenship behavior, and turnover intentions in a union context: Examining the mediating role of perceived union support and union instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86, 154–160.
3.
Audit Commission. In the line of fire. HMSO: London, 1995.
4.
Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, P.A. & Conley, S.Professionals and workplace control: Organizational and demographic models of teacher militancy. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1990, 43, 570–586.
5.
Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, P.A. & Sonnenstuhl, W.J.Mutual aid and union renewal: Cycles of logics of action. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.
6.
Bamberger, P.A., Kluger, A.N. & Suchard, R.The antecedents and consequences of union commitment: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42, 304–318.
7.
Bassett, P. & Cave, A.All for one: The future of the unions. London: Fabian Society, 1993.
8.
Brown, J. Recruitment of female fire-fighters: The burning issue. Unpublished Diploma in Management dissertation, University of Teesside, 1999.
9.
Dalton, D.R., Johnson, J.L. & Daily, C.M.On the use of ‘intent to...’ variables in organizational research: An empirical and cautionary assessment. Human Relations, 1999, 52, 1337–1350.
10.
Darlington, R.Workplace union resilience in the Merseyside Fire Brigade. Industrial Relations Journal, 1998, 29, 58–73.
11.
Deery, S.J., Iverson, R.D. & Erwin, P.J.Predicting organizational and union commitment: The effect of industrial relations climate. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1994, 32, 581–597.
12.
Dundon, T.Post-privatised shop steward organisation and union renewal at Girobank. Industrial Relations Journal, 1998, 29, 126–136.
13.
Elliot, D. & Smith, D.Coping with the sharp end: Recruitment and selection in the fire service. Disaster Management, 1993, 5, 35–41.
14.
Fairbrother, P.Workplace trade unionism in the state sector. In P. Ackers, C. Smith & P. Smith (Eds), The new workplace and trade unionism: Critical perspectives on work and organization. London: Routledge, 1996.
15.
Fairbrother, P.Trade unions at the crossroads. London: Mansell, 2000.
16.
Fire Brigades Union. Their business or our service: A report on new management initiatives in the fire service. London: Fire Brigades Union, 1992.
17.
Fire Brigades Union. A fire service for the future. Available: http:/www.fbu-ho.org.uk/html, 1998.
18.
Fitzgerald, I. & Stirling, J.A slow burning flame? Organizational change and industrial relations in the fire service. Industrial Relations Journal, 1999, 30, 46–60.
19.
Fosh, P.Membership participation in work-place unionism: The possibility of union renewal. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1993, 31, 576–592.
20.
Frege, C. & Kelly, J.Union revitalization strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2003, 9, 7–24.
21.
Fullagar, C. & Barling, J.A longitudinal test of a model of the antecedents and consequences of union loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74, 213–227.
22.
Fullagar, C.J.A., McLean Parks, J., Clark, P.F. & Gallagher, D.G. Organizational citizenship and union participation: Measuring discretionary membership behaviors. In L.E. Tetrick & J. Barling (Eds), Changing employment relations: Behavioral and social perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995.
23.
Fuller, J.B. & Hester, K.The effect of labour relations climate on the union participation process. Journal of Labor Research, 1998, 14, 171–187.
24.
Fuller, J.B. & Hester, K.A closer look at the relationship between justice perceptions and union participation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86, 1096–1105.
25.
Hammer, T.H., Currall, S.C. & Stern, R.N.Worker representation on boards of directors: A study of competing roles. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1991, 44, 661–680.
26.
Heery, E.The new new unionism. In I.J. Beardwell (Ed.), Contemporary industrial relations: A critical analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
27.
Heery, E. & Kelly, J.Professional, participative and managerial unionism: An interpretation of change in trade unions. Work, Employment and Society, 1994, 8, 1–22.
28.
Heery, E., Simms, M., Simpson, D., Delbridge, R. & Salmon, J.Organizing unionism comes to the UK. Employee Relations, 2000, 22, 38–57.
29.
HMSO. Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Fire Services for England and Wales, 1999/00. London: HMSO, 2000.
30.
Hunt, S.D. & Morgan, R.M.Organizational commitment: Many constructs or key mediating construct?Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 1568–1587.
31.
Kelloway, E.K. & Barling, J.Members’ participation in local union activities: Measurement, prediction and replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78, 262–279.
32.
Kelloway, E.K., Catano, V.M. & Carroll, A.E.The nature of member participation in local union activities. In L.E. Tetrick & J. Barling (Eds), Changing employment relations: Behavioral and social perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995.
33.
Kelly, C. & Kelly, J.Who gets involved in collective action? Social-psychological determinants of individual participation in trade unions. Human Relations, 1994, 47, 63–88.
34.
Klandermans, B.Psychology and trade union participation: Joining, acting, quitting. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 189–204.
35.
Kuruvilla, S., Gallagher, D.G., Fiorito, J. & Wakabayashi, M.Union participation in Japan: Do Western theories apply?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1990, 43, 374–398.
36.
Martin, J.E. & Peterson, M.M.Two-tier wage structures: Implications for equity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 1987, 30, 297–315.
37.
Mathieu, J.E. & Farr, J.L.Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 127–133.
38.
McLean Parks, J., Gallagher, D.G. & Fullagar, C.J.A.Operationalizing the outcomes of union commitment: The dimensionality of participation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1995, 16, 533–555.
39.
McShane, S.L.The multidimensionality of union participation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 177–187.
40.
Meyer, J.P. & Allen, N.J.Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.
41.
Moorman, R.H.Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 725–731.
42.
Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. & Steers, R.M.Employee–organizational linkages: The psychology of comimitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
43.
Newton, L.A. & McFarlane Shore, L.A model of union membership: Instrumentality, commitment and opposition. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17, 275–298.
44.
Snape, E. & Redman, T.An evaluation of three-component model of occupational commitment: Dimensionality and consequences among United Kingdom human resource management specialists. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88, 152–159.
45.
Sverke, M. & Kuruvilla, S.A new conceptualization of union commitment: Development and test of an integrated theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1995, 16, 519–533.
46.
Sverke, M. & Sjoberg, A.Union membership behavior: The influence of instrumental and value-based commitment. In L.E. Tetrick & J. Barling (Eds), Changing employment relations: Behavioral and social perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995.
47.
Tan, H.H. & Aryee, S.Antecedents and outcomes of union loyalty: A constructive replication and an extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87, 715–722.
48.
Waddington, J. & Kerr, A.Trying to stem the flow: Union membership turnover in the public sector. Industrial Relations Journal, 1999, 30, 184–196.
49.
Williams, S.The nature of some recent trade union modernization policies in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1997, 35, 495–514.
