Data obtained from unionized employees in Singapore (N = 205) were used to investigate Strauss' (1977) suggestion that union participation studies be fitted into the general theories of role and commitment. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to examine the contribution of role commitment variables (family and union) net of demographic, job or work and union-related variables to the explained variance in a unidimensional model of union participation. The model accounted for 43% (R2) of the explained variance in participation with the role commitment antecedent set contributing a modest 5% (ΔR2). The significant positive individual variables were union satisfaction, union commitment, union tenure, and gender while union socialization and marital status positively, and family commitment negatively approached significance. Extrinsic satisfaction was significantly negatively related to participation. Limitations of the study, directions for future research and the implications of the findings are discussed.
AHMED, Z. L.Women's work and their struggle to organize . Development, 1984, 4, 36-40 .
2.
ANANTARAMAN, V.Singapore Industrial Relations System. Singapore: McGraw Hill , 1990.
3.
ANDERSON, J.A comparative analysis of local union democracy . Industrial Relations, 1978, 17, 278-295 .
4.
ARYEE, S. , DEBRAH. Y. , ARIFF, M. , & CHAY, Y. W.Dual commitment: An analysis of its antecedents and outcomes among rank-and-file unionized employees. Unpublished manuscript, 1992.
5.
BARLING, J. , FULLAGAR, C. , & KELLOWAY, E.The union and its members: A psychological approach. New York. Oxford University Press , 1992.
6.
BURKE, P.The self. Measurement implications from a symbolic interactionism perspective . Social Psychology Quarter0y, 1980, 43, 18-29 .
7.
CALDWETL, D. , CHATMAN, J. , & O'REILLY, C.Building organizational commitment: A multi-firm study . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1990, 63, 245-261 .
8.
CHACKO, T. I.Member participation in union activities: Perceptions of union priorities, performance and satisfaction . Journal of Labor Research, 1985, 4, 363-373 .
9.
CHEW, S. B.Trade unionism in Singapore. Singapore: McGraw-Hill , 1991.
10.
CHILD, J. , LOVERIDGE, R. & WARNER, M.Towards an organizational study of trade unions . Sociology, 1973, 7, 71-91 .
11.
COMREY, A. L.Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 648-659 .
12.
COOK, J. D. , HEPWORTH, S. J. , WALL, T. , & WARR, P.The experience of work. London: Academic Press , 1981.
13.
CORNFIELD, D. B. , FILHO, H. B. & CHUN, B. J.Household, work and labor activism . Work and Occupations, 1990, 17, 131-151 .
14.
DASTMALCHIAN, A. , BLYTON, P. , & ADAMSON, R.Industrial relations climate: Testing a construct . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1989, 62, 21-32 .
15.
DESPHANDE, S. , & FIORITO, J.Specific and general beliefs in union voting models . Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 888-897 .
16.
FIORITO, J. , GALLAGHER, D. G. , & FUKAMI, C. V.Satisfaction with union representation . Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1988, 41, 294-307 .
17.
GALLAGHER, D. G. , & CLARK, P. F.Research on union commitment: Implications for labor . Labor Studies Journal, 1989, 14, 53-71 .
18.
GALLAGHER, D. G. , & STRAUSS, G.Union membership attitudes and participation. In G. Strauss , D. G. Gallagher , & J. Fiorito , (Eds.), The state of the unions. Madison, Wisconsin: Industrial Relations Association , 1991.
19.
GLICK, W. , MIRVIS, P. , & HARDER, D.Union satisfaction and participation . Industrial Relations, 1977, 16, 145-151 .
20.
GORDON, M. , PHILPOT. J. , BUR; P. , THOMPSON, C. , & SPILLER, W.Commitment to the union: Development of a measure and examination of its correlates . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 479-498 .
21.
HESHIZER, N. , MARIN, H. , & WIENER, Y.Normative commitment and instrumental attachment as intervening variables in the prediction of union participation . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1991, 27, 532-549 .
22.
HUSZCZO, G. E.Attitudinal and behavioral variables related to participation in union activities . Journal of Labor Research, 1983, 4, 289-297 .
23.
JARLEY, P. , KURUVILLA, S. , & CASTEEL. D.Member-union relations and union satisfaction . Industrial Relations, 1990, 29, 128-134 .
24.
KANE, E. , & MARSDEN, D.The future of trade unionism in industrial market economics . Labor and Society, 1988, 13, 109-124 .
25.
KELLOWAY, E. K. , & BARLING, J.Members' participation in local union activities: Measurement, prediction and replication . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78, 262-279 .
26.
KIANDERMAN, S. B.Psychology and trade union participation: Joining, acting and quitting . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 189-204 .
27.
KOCHAN, T.Contemporary Views of American Workers Toward Bade Unions. Research Report to the Department of Labor, GPO, Washington, D.C. , 1978.
28.
KURUVILLA. S. , GALLAGHER, D. G. , FIORITO, J. , & WAKABAYASHI, M.Union participation in Japan: Do Western theories apply?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1990, 43, 374-389 .
29.
LASSEWELL, T. , & BURMA, J. , & ARONSON, S.Life in society. Chicago: Scott Foresman , 1965.
30.
LEICHTT K. T.Unions, plants, jobs and workers: An analysis of union satisfaction and participation . Sociological Quarterly, 1989, 30, 331-362 .
31.
MAGENAU, J. M. , MARTIN, J. E. , & PETERSON, M. M.Dual and unilateral commitment among stewards and rank-and-file union members . Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 359-376 .
32.
McSHANE, S. L.A path-analytic study of participation in union administration . Industrial Relations, 1986, 25, 72-80 . (a)
33.
McSHANE, S. L.The multidimensionality of union participation . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 177-187 . (b)
34.
McSHANE, S. L.General union attitudes: A construct validation . Journal of Labor Research, 1986, 12, 403-417 (c)
MISRA, S. , GHOSH, R. , & KANUNGO, R. N.Measurement of family involvement . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1990, 21, 232-284 .
37.
NICHOLSON, N. , URSELT, G. , & BLYTON, P.7he dynamics of white collar unionism. New York Academic Press , 1981.
38.
OLSON, M.7he logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1971.
39.
PURCELL, T. V.The worker speaks his mind on company and union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1954.
40.
RICHARDSON, M. S.Occupational and family roles: A neglected intersection . The Counselling Psychologist, 1981, 9, 13-23 .
41.
RICHARDSON, M. S. , & ALPER J. L.Correlates of Job Involvement in College Women . Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, March 1978.
42.
RODAN, G.The political economy of Singapore's industrialization: National state and international capital. London: MacMillan Press , 1989.
43.
SAYLES, L. R. , & STRAUSS, G.The local union: It's place in the industrial plant. New York: Harper and Brothers , 1953.
44.
SNAPE, E. , & BAMBER, G.The role of trade unions in the coming decade . Social and Labor Bulletin, 1987, 1, 76-81 .
45.
STRAUSS, G.Union government in the U.S.: Research past and future . Industrial Relations, 1977, 16, 215-242 .
46.
STRYKER, S. , & STATHAM, A.Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey , & E. Aronson , (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1). Theory and method. New York: Random House , 1985, pp. 311-378.
47.
TAN, E. S.Theorising the dynamics of industrial relations and trade unionism: Lessons from the Singapore case. Working Paper #116, Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore , 1993.
48.
TAYLOR, J. , & BOWERS, D.Survey of Organizations: A Machine Scored Standardized Questionnaire Instrument. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan , 1972.
49.
WEISS, D. J. , DAWIS, R. V. , ENGLAND, G. W. , & LOFQUIST L. H.Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, 1967.
