McSweeney’s critique (2002) rejects Hofstede’s model and finds national culture implausible as a systematically causal factor of behaviour. His critique is examined for its useful warnings to those who follow Hofstede’s research and for its logical consistency. A paradigmatic perspective identifies where McSweeney argues against Hofstede’s logic and where he rejects Hofstede’s paradigm and premises. This indicates that both the functionalist and other paradigms are needed for future research into national culture and for understanding social behaviour in different national cultures.
Adler, N.A typology of management studies involving culture . Journal of International Business Studies, 1983, 29-47.
2.
Altheide, D. & Johnson, J.Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
3.
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T.The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books, 1967.
4.
Bhimani, A.Mapping methodological frontiers in cross-national management control research . Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1999, 24, 413-440.
5.
Birnberg, J. & Snodgrass, C.Culture and control: A field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1988, 13, 447-464.
6.
Burrell, G. & Morgan, G.Social paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann Educational, 1979.
7.
Chanchani, S. & MacGregor, A.A synthesis of cultural studies in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1999, 18, 1-30.
8.
Child, J.Culture, contingency and capitalism in the cross-national study of organisations. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1981.
9.
Chinese Culture Connection . Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1987, 18, 143-164.
10.
Chow, C.W. , Shields, M.D. & Wu, A.The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multi-national operations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1999, 24, 441-461.
11.
Cronbach, L. & Meehl, P.Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52, 281-302.
12.
Evered, R. & Louis, M.Alternative perspectives in the organisation sciences: ‘Inquiry from the inside’ and ‘inquiry from the outside’. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6, 385-395.
13.
Geertz, C.The interpretation of cultures. London: Fontana, 1973.
14.
Gioia, D. & Pitre, E.Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15, 584-602.
15.
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
16.
Hall, E.Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Books, 1977.
17.
Hammersley, M.The dilemma of qualitative method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago tradition. London: Routledge, 1989.
18.
Hammersley, M.Some reflections on ethnography and validity . Qualitative Studies in Education, 1992, 5, 195-203.
19.
Harrison, G. & McKinnon, J.Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: A review of the current state. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1999, 24, 483-506.
20.
Hofstede, G.Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
21.
Hofstede, G.Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
22.
Hofstede, G.Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
23.
Hofstede, G. & Peterson, M.National values and organizational practices. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom & M. Peterson (Eds), Handbook of organizational culture and climate. London: Sage, 2000.
24.
Hofstede, G. , Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. & Sanders, G.Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35, 286-316.
25.
Horovitz, J.Top management control in Europe. London: Macmillan, 1980.
26.
Jackson, T.Cultural values and management ethics: A 10-nation study . Human Relations, 2001, 54, 1267-1302.
27.
Kaufmann, P. , Welsh, D. & Bushmarin, N.Locus of control and entrepreneurship in the Russian Republic. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1995, 20, 43-56.
28.
Kuhn, T.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
29.
Kvale, S.Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
30.
Lachman, R. , Nedd, A. & Hinings, B.Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework. Management Science, 1994, 40, 40-55.
31.
Lammers, C.Towards the internationalization of the organization sciences. In G. Hofstede & M.S. Kassem (Eds), European contributions to organization theory. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1975.
32.
Lenartowicz, T. & Roth, K.A framework for culture assessment. Journal of International Business, 1999, 30, 781-798.
33.
Llewellyn, S.The role of case study methods in management accounting research: A comment . British Accounting Review, 1992, 24, 17-31.
34.
Maruyama, M.Paradigmatology and its application to cross-disciplinary, cross-professional and cross-cultural communication . Dialectica, 1974, 28, 135-196.
35.
McSweeney, B.Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and the consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis . Human Relations, 2002, 55, 89-118.
36.
Mead, M.Coming of age in Samoa. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1943.
Russell, B.History of western philosophy. London: Routledge, 1961.
39.
Schwartz, S.Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, 25, 1-65.
40.
Schwartz, S. & Sagiv, L.Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1995, 26, 92-116.
41.
Smith, J. & Deemer, D.The problem of criteria in the age of realism In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds), The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.
42.
Smith, P.Culture’s consequences: Something old and something new . Human Relations, 2002, 1, 119-135.
43.
Smith, P. , Dugan, S. & Trompenaars, F.National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1996, 27, 231-264.
44.
Sondergaard, M.Hofstede’s consequences: A study or reviews, citations and replications . Organization Studies, 1994, 15, 447-456.
45.
Trompenaars, F.Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Economist Books, 1993.
46.
Trompenaars, F. & Hampden-Turner, C.Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business (2nd edn). London: Nicholas Breazley, 1997.
47.
Tschudi, F.Do qualitative and quantitative methods require different approaches to validity? In S. Kvale (Ed.), Issues of validity in qualitative research. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1989.
48.
Woolliams, P.The Trompenaars database. In F. Trompenaars & C. Hampden-Turner (Eds), Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business (2nd edn). London: Nicholas Brealey, 1997.
