Organization members face difficult choices when they encounter situations which they consider illegitimate, immoral, or unlawful, but lack corrective power. They can ‘blow the whistle’ to authorities, but often, their organizations do not change the objectionable practice. Circumstances under which whistle-blowers succeed in terminating perceived wrongdoing have not been studied, so this study tests portions of a preliminary model of effectiveness derived from power theories. Results from three field studies show that whistle-blowers perceive that wrongdoing is more likely to be terminated when: (i) it occurs less frequently, is relatively minor in impact, or has been occurring for a shorter period; and (ii) whistle-blowers have greater power - reflected in the legitimacy of their roles and the support of others. Implications for research and for would-be whistle-blowers, their organizations, and policy makers, are discussed.
Baucus, M.S. & Near, J.P.Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 9-36.
3.
Black, D.Sociological justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
4.
Brewer, G.A.Incidence of whistleblowing in the public and private sectors. Working paper, The University of Georgia, Athens, 1995.
5.
Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1966.
6.
Crampton, S.M. & Wagner, J.A., III.Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79, 67-76.
7.
Devine, T.Chapter 2: What to expect: Classic responses to whistle-blowing. In Government Accountability Project, The whistleblower’s survival guide: Courage without martyrdom. Washington, DC: Fund for Constitutional Government, 1997.
8.
Dutton, J.E. , Ashford, S.J., O’Neill, R.M., Hayes, E. & Wierba, E.E.Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18, 407-423.
9.
Dworkin, T.M. & Near, J.P.A better statutory approach to whistle-blowing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1997, 7, 1-16.
10.
Ellis, S. & Arieli, S.Predicting intentions to report administrative and disciplinary infractions: Applying the reasoned action model. Human Relations, 1999, 52, 947-967.
11.
Erdreich, B.L. , Slavet, B.S. & Amador, A.C.Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Trends, progress, continuing challenges. Report of the Merit Systems Protection Board, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1995.
12.
Fitzgerald, L.F. , Drasgow, F., Hulin, C.L., Gelfand, M.J. & Magley, V.J.The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82, 578-589.
13.
French, J.R.P. & Raven, B.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.
14.
Glazer, M.P. & Glazer, P.M.The whistle-blowers: Exposing corruption in government and industry. New York: Basic Books, 1989.
15.
Harman, H.H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
16.
Jones, T.M.Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model . Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16, 366-395.
17.
King, G., III . The effects of interpersonal closeness and issue seriousness on blowing the whistle. Journal of Business Communication, 1997, 34, 419-436.
18.
Klaas, B.S. , McClendon, J. & Gainey, T.W.HR outsourcing and its impact: The role of transaction costs. Personnel Psychology, 1999, 52, 113-136.
19.
Kotter, J.P. & Schlesinger, L.A.Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 1979, 57, 106-114.
20.
Mathews, M.C.Codes of ethics: Organizational behavior and misbehavior. In W.C. Frederick (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987.
21.
Mautz, R.K. , Tiessen, P. & Colson, R.H.Internal auditing: Directions and opportunities. Altamonte Springs, FL: Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, 1984.
22.
Miceli, M.P. & Near, J.P.Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. New York: Lexington, 1992.
23.
Miceli, M.P. & Near, J.P.Definition of ‘whistle-blowing’. In L.H. Peters, C.R.B. Greer and S.A. Youngblood (Eds), The Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of human resource management. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
24.
Miceli, M.P. , Near, J.P. & Schwenk, C.P.Who blows the whistle and why?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1991, 45, 113-130.
25.
Miceli, M.P. , Rehg, M., Near, J.P. & Ryan, K.Can laws protect whistle-blowers? Results of a naturally occurring field experiment. Work and Occupations, 1999, 26, 129-151.
26.
Miethe, T.D.Whistle-blowing at work: Tough choices in exposing fraud, waste and abuse on the job. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.
27.
Miethe, T.D. & Rothschild, J.Whistleblowing and the control of organizational misconduct. Sociological Inquiry, 1994, 64, 322-347.
28.
Morrison, E.W.Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective . Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 1543-1567.
29.
Moscovici, S.Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press, 1976.
30.
Near, J.P. & Jensen, T.C.The whistle-blowing process: Retaliation and perceived effectiveness. Work and Occupations, 1983, 10, 3-28.
31.
Near, J.P. & Miceli, M.P.Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 1985, 4, 1-16.
32.
Near, J.P. & Miceli, M.P.Retaliation against whistle-blowers: Predictors and effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 137-145.
33.
Near, J.P. & Miceli, M.P.Whistle-blowers in organizations: Dissidents or reformers? In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987.
34.
Near, J.P. & Miceli, M.P.Effective whistle-blowing. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, 679-708.
35.
O’Leary-Kelly, A.M. & Bowes-Sperry, L.Sexual harassment as unethical behavior: The role of moral intensity. Human Resource Management Review, 2001, 10.
36.
Parmerlee, M.A. , Near, J.P. & Jensen, T.C.Correlates of whistle-blowers’ perceptions of organizational retaliation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27, 17-34.
37.
Perrucci, R.M. , Anderson, R.M., Schendel, D.E. & Trachtman, L.E.Whistle-blowing: Professionals’ resistance to organizational authority. Social Problems, 1980, 28, 149-164.
38.
Perry, J.L.The consequences of speaking out: Processes of hostility and issue resolution involving federal whistleblowers . Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, 1992.
39.
Perry, J.L.Whistleblowing, organizational performance, and organizational control. In H.G. Frederickson (Ed.), Ethics and public administration. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1993.
40.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R.The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
41.
Podsakoff, P. & Organ, D.W.Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 1986, 12, 531-544.
42.
Rothschild, J. & Miethe, T.D.Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organizational corruption. Work and Occupations, 1999, 26, 107-128.
43.
Roznowski, M. & Hanisch, K.A.Building systematic heterogeneity into work attitude and behavior measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1990, 36, 361-375.
