In this article, we examine how genetic testing may be the basis of a new form of exclusion in organizations. Testing reveals the genetic composition of an individual and can identify genetically linked conditions. Discrimination, related to genetic composition, may occur through either the stigmatization or categorization of individuals or groups based on genetic test results. The potential impact of genetic testing and the associated discriminatory processes on both employees and organizations is outlined. This research discusses individual (stigmatization, perceived discrimination, and symptom timing and visibility), organizational (actual discrimination, genetic testing use and accommodation) and environmental (regulatory agencies, genetic testing laboratories, insurance providers and genetic advocacy groups) factors that impact genetic testing. Lastly, we propose research questions linked to these factors to guide future organizational study.
Alrc 96. Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia, 2003. Available online at: [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reports/96/index.html], accessed 1 July 2004.
2.
Asch, A. Genetics and employment : More disability discrimination. In T.H. Murray , M.A. Rothstein & R.F. Murray, Jr (Eds), The human genome project and the future of health care. Bloomington: Indiana University Press , 1996, pp. 158—72.
3.
Baldridge, D.C. & Veiga, J.F.The impact of anticipated social consequences on recurring disability accommodation requests . Journal of Management, 2006, 32, 158—79 .
4.
Barrett, A.IBM's smart stance on genetic testing . Business Week Online , 10 October 2005, available online at: [ http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2005/tc20051011_9733_tc024.htm ], accessed 5 January 2006.
5.
Begley, S.Bill seeking to ban DNA discrimination isn't really necessary . Wall Street Journal, 6 February 2004, p. B1 .
6.
Billings, P.R. , Kohn, M.A. , de Cuevas, M. , Beckwith, J. , Alper, J.S. & Natowicz, M.R.Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing . American Journal of Human Genetics, 1992 , 50, 476—82 .
7.
Board of Directors of Council for Responsible Genetics.The genetic bill of rights, 2000. Available online at: [ http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/bill-of-rights/bill-of-rights-text.html ], accessed 13 March 2007.
8.
Bonham, V.L. , Warshauer-Baker, E. & Collins, F.S.Race and ethnicity in the genome era . American Psychologist , 2005, 60(1), 9—15 .
Brock, D.W.The human genome project and human identity. In R.F. Weir , S.C. Lawrence & E. Fales (Eds), Genes and human self-knowledge: Historical and philosophical reflections on modern genetic. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press , 1994, pp. 18—33.
11.
Burgermeister, J.Germany may allow employers to introduce gene tests for job seekers, 2004a. Available online at: [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7472/940-c ], accessed 5 January 2006.
12.
Burgermeister, J.Switzerland has opened the door to genetic discrimination say ethicists, 2004b. Available online at: [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7457/70-a ], accessed 15 January 2006.
13.
Butchvarov, P.Some concerns about self-knowledge and the human genome project. In R .F. Weir , S.C. Lawrence & E. Fales (Eds), Genes and human self-knowledge: Historical and philosophical reflections on modern genetic. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press , 1994, pp. 46—8.
14.
Cates, D.F.Commentary on genetic knowledge and self-understanding. In R.F. Weir , S.C. Lawrence & E. Fales (Eds), Genes and human self-knowledge: Historical and philosophical reflections on modern genetic. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press , 1994, pp. 59—62.
15.
Crocker, J.Social stigma and self-esteem: Situational construction of self-worth . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1999, 35, 89—107 .
16.
Dabos, G.E. & Rousseau, D.M.Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers . Journal of Applied Psychology , 2004, 89, 52—72 .
17.
Diamond, A.L.Genetic testing in employment situations: A question of worker rights. TheJournal of Legal Medicine, 1983, 4(2), 231—56 .
18.
Evans , D.C. A comparison of the other-directed stigmatization produced by legal and illegal forms of affirmative action . Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88, 121—30 .
19.
Flynn, G.To test or not: Genetic mapping poses ethical dilemmas for employers . Workforce, 2000, 79(12), 108—09 .
20.
Genetic Discrimination Project. Research stages and phases, 2007. Available online at: [http://www.gdproject.org/researchstages/index.php ], accessed 9 March 2007.
21.
Gioia, D.A.Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities . Journal of Business Ethics, 1992, 11, 379—89 .
22.
Goffman, E. Stigma : Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall , 1963.
23.
Gostin, L.Genetic discrimination: The use of genetically based diagnostic and prognostic tests by employers and insurers . American Journal of Law and Medicine, 1991, 17, 109—44 .
24.
Harmon, A.The problem with an almost-perfect genetic world . The New York Times, 20 November 2005, Section 4, 1 , 14 .
25.
Heffner, T.S. & Rentsch, J.R.Organizational commitment and social interaction: A multiple constituencies approach . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001, 59, 471—90 .
26.
Hessler, U.Ethics council warns again gene testing, 2005. Available online at: [http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1682342,00.html ], accessed 15 January 2006.
27.
Holtzman, N.A.Promoting safe and effective genetic tests in the United States: Work of the task force on genetic testing . Clinical Chemistry, 1999, 45(5), 732—8 .
28.
Hubbard, R. & Henifin, M.S.Genetic screening of prospective parents and of workers: Some scientific and social issues . International Journal of Health Services, 1985, 15(2), 231—51 .
29.
Human Genome Project Information, 2003. Available online at: [http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/home.shtm ], accessed 3 February 2004.
30.
Huntington's Disease Society of America (HDSA) , 2004. Available online at: [http://hdsa.org/], accessed 3 February 2004.
31.
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.Genetic Testing in the Workplace, 2007. Available online at: [http://www.goiam.org/content.cfm?cID=8594 ], accessed 9 March 2007.
32.
Jones, E.E. , Farina, A. , Hastorf, A.H. , Markus, H. , Miller, D.T. & Scott, R.A.Social stigma, the psychology of marked relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. , 1984.
33.
Jones, N.L.Genetic information: Legal issues relating to discrimination and privacy . CRS Report for Congress, The Library of Congress , 2001, Order Code RL30006.
34.
Kenen, R.H. & Schmidt, R.M.Stigmatization of carrier status: Social implications of heterozygote genetic screening programs . American Journal of Public Health, 1978, 68(11), 1116—20 .
Lublin, J.Should job hunters reveal chronic illness? The pros and cons . Wall Street Journal, 13 January 2004, p. B1 .
37.
Lueck, S.New kits let you test your own genes, but interpreting the results is tricky . Wall Street Journal, 25 May 2005, p. D1 .
38.
MacDonald, C. & Williams-Jones, B. Ethics and genetics : Susceptibility testing in the workplace . Journal of Business Ethics, 2002, 35, 235—41 .
39.
Markel, K.S. & Barclay, L.A.Genetic commerce: The challenges for human resource management. In R. Kolb (Ed.), The Leeds School series on business and society. Oxford: Blackwell , 2007a.
40.
Markel, K.S. & Barclay, L.A.The intersection of risk management and human resources: An illustration using genetic mapping. International Journal of Risk Assessment andManagement, 2007b, 7(3), 326—40 .
41.
McNally, E. , Cambon-Thomsen, A. , Brazell, C. , Cassiman, J. , Kent, A. , Lindpaintner, K. , Lobato de Faria, P. , Niese, D. , Roscam Abbing, H. , Helge Solbakk, J. , Tack, H. , Tambuyzer, E. , Weihrauch, T. & Wendel, E.25 recommendations on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic testing. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities , 2004 .
42.
Mellor, S. , Mathieu, J.E. , Barnes-Farrell, J.L. & Rogelberg, S.G.Employees' nonwork obligations and organizational commitments: A new way to look at relationships . Human Resource Management, 2001, 40(2), 171—84 .
43.
Meyer, J.P. , Paunonen, S.V. , Gellatly, R.D. , Goffin, R.D. & Jackson, D.N.Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74, 152—6 .
44.
Meyer, J.P. , Stanley, D.J. , Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L.Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2002, 61, 20—52 .
45.
Murry, W.D. , Wimbush, J.C. & Dalton, D.R.Genetic screening in the workplace: Legislative and ethical implications . Journal of Business Ethics, 2001, 29(4), 365—78 .
46.
National Human Genome Research Institute.An overview of the human genome project, 2005. Available online at: [www.genome.gov/12011238], accessed 28 November 2005.
47.
National Institutes of Health.International HapMap consortium expands mapping effort. NIH News, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services , released 7 February 2005. Available online at: [ www.nih.gov/news/pr/feb2005/nhgri-07.htm]
48.
Natowicz, M.R. , Alper, J.K. & Alper, J.S.Genetic discrimination and the law . American Journal of Human Genetics, 1992, 50, 465—75 .
49.
Nelkin, D. & Lindee, M.S.The DNA mystique, the gene as a cultural icon. New York : W.H. Freeman and Company , 1995 .
50.
Nelkin, D. & Tancredi, L.Dangerous diagnostics: The social power of biological information. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press , 1994.
51.
Nicholson, C.L.Genetic testing and the life insurance industry. Millman & Robertson, Inc. , 7 December 2000.
52.
Norris, K.His ultimatum: Quit smoking or lose job. Detroit Free Press , 15 February 2005, p. 1.
53.
Nowlan, W.Genetic testing debate may be entering a new era . National Underwriter, 2000, 104(5), 19 .
54.
Peters, D.A.Risk classification, genetic testing and health care: A conflict between libertarian and egalitarian values . In T. Peters (Ed.), Genetics: Issues of social justice . Cleveland, OH : The Pilgrim Library of Ethics, 1998 , pp. 205—17 .
55.
Pokorski, R.J.Insurance underwriting in the genetic era . American Journal of Human Genetics, 1997, 60, 205—16 .
56.
Reilly, P.Government support of genetic services . Social Biology, 1978, 25, 23—32 .
57.
Reynolds, L.Hiring decisions peppered with salts and science . HR Focus , 8 October 1997.
58.
Smircich, L.Concepts of culture and organizational analysis . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28(3), 339—58 .
59.
Staley, K.Genetic testing in the workplace. Derbyshire , UK: Genewatch , 2003.
60.
Steinberg, K.K.Risks associated with genetic testing: Health insurance discrimination or simply business as usual?Journal of the American Medical Women's Association, 2000, 55(4), 241—2 .
61.
Stone, D.A.The implications of the human genome project for access to health insurance . In T.H. Murray , M.A. Rothstein & R.F. Murray, Jr (Eds), The human genome project and the future of health care. Bloomington: Indiana University Press , 1996, pp. 133—57.
62.
Stone, D.L. & Colella , A. A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations . Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(2), 352—401 .
63.
Suzuki, D. & Knudtson, P.Genethics, the clash between the new genetics and human values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1989.
64.
The Association of British Insurers.Insurance and genetic tests: What you need to know, 2007. Available online at: [http://www.abi.org.uk/Display/default.asp?Menu_ID=946&Menu_All=1,946,0&Child_ID=131#Anchor4], accessed 9 March 2007.
65.
Trades Union Congress.Online newsletter , September 2003. Available online at: [ http://www.tuc.org.uk/h_and_s/tuc-7120-f0.cfm#u1], accessed 21 January 2004.
66.
Trice, H.M. & Beyer, J.M.The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall , 1993.
67.
United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.The role of genetic testing in the prevention of occupational diseases. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office , 1983.
68.
Wertz, D.C. & Fletcher, J.C.An international survey of attitudes of medical geneticists toward mass screening and access to results . Public Health Reports, 1989, 104(1), 35—44 .
69.
Wyld, D.C. , Cappel, S.D. & Hallock, D.E.Genetic testing of employees: New technologies, new challenges, and new laws . . . Equal Opportunities International, 1992, 11(1), 1—7 .
