This article explores young European women and men’s expectations of support - from the state and employers - for reconciling paid employment and family life. It is based on a qualitative study employing focus groups with young women and men in Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Ireland and the UK. Drawing on the concept of sense of entitlement, derived from social justice theory, it was expected that the type of welfare state and ‘gender contract’ that young adults have experienced will influence their sense of entitlement to support for work and family life. Findings indicate that participants perceived their entitlement to state and employer support differently across national context. However this is moderated by gender, parental and occupational status, and particularly by awareness of provisions in other countries in the case of state support, while perceived entitlement to employer support varies according to the specific policy considered, gender and perception of benefits to employers. Some implications for public policy makers and employers are discussed.
Andersson, L.Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework . Human Resources, 1996, 49, 1395-1418.
2.
Aryee, S. & Luk, V.Balancing two major patterns of adult life experience: Work and family identity among dual-earner couples. Human Relations, 1997, 50, 465-488.
3.
Aryee, S. , Luk, V. & Stone, R.Family responsive variables and retention-relevant outcomes among employed parents. Human Relations, 1998, 51, 73-87.
4.
Bauman, Z.Globalisation: The human consequences. London: Polity Press, 1998.
5.
Beck, U.The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (Eds), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.
6.
Bevan, S. , Kettley, P. & Patch, A.Who cares? The business benefits of carer-friendly policies. Brighton: Institute of Employment Studies, 1997.
7.
Bevan, S. , Dench, S., Tamkin, P. & Cummings, A.Family friendly employment: The business case. London: DfEE, 1999.
8.
Brannen, J. & Moss, P.Managing mothers. London: Unwin Hyman, 1991.
9.
Brannen, J. , Moss, P., Owen, C. & Wale, C.Mothers, fathers and employment: Parents and the labour market 1984-1994. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment, 1997.
10.
Brannen, J. & Smithson, J.Combining employment and parenthood: Ideal and practical possibilities. Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas, 1998, 27, 11-26.
11.
Brewster, C. & Hegewisch, A.Policy and practice in human resource management. London: Routledge, 1994.
12.
Burgoyne, C.B. & Lewis, A.Distributive justice in marriage: Equality or equity?Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1994, 4(2), 101-114.
13.
Byslma, W.H. & Major, B.Social comparisons and contentment: Exploring the psychological costs of the gender wage gap. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1994, 18, 241-249.
14.
Condor, S.Sex-role beliefs and ‘traditional’ women: Feminist and intergroup perspectives. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1986.
15.
Desmarais, S. & Curtis, J.Gender and perceived pay entitlement: Testing for effects of experience with income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72(1), 141-150.
16.
Den Dulk, L. , Van Doorne-Huiskes, A. & Schippers, J.Work-family arrangements in Europe. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 1999.
17.
Deven, F. & Moss, P.Parental leave in Europe: Research and policy issues. Brussels: CBGS/NIDI, 2000.
18.
Duncan, S.The diverse worlds of European Patriarchy. In M. Dolors Garcia-Ramon and J. Monk (Eds), Women of the European Union: The politics of work and daily life. London: Routledge, 1996.
19.
Esping-Anderson, G.The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
20.
European CommissionYouth in the European Union: From education to working life. Luxembourg: European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, L-2985, 1997.
21.
European CommissionEquality quarterly news. Brussels: Directorate General V. Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, 1999a.
22.
European CommissionEqual opportunities magazine. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,1999b.
23.
EurostatLabour force survey: Results 1996. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1997.
24.
Evans, K. & Furlong, A.Metaphors of youth transitions: Niches, pathways, trajectories and navigations. In J. Bynner, L. Chisholm and A. Furlong (Eds), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot: Avebury, 1997.
25.
Forbes, I.Equal opportunity: Radical, liberal and conservative critiques. In E. Meehan and S. Sevenhuijsen (Eds), Equality politics and gender. London: Sage, 1991.
26.
Forth, J., Lissenburgh, S., Callendar, C. & Millward, N. Family friendly working arrangements in Britain, 1996. Research Report No 16, Policy Studies Institute, London: DfEE, 1997.
27.
Furlong, A. & Cartmel, F.Young people and social change: Individualization and risk in late modernity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1997.
28.
Galinsky, E. & Johnson, A.A.Reframing the business case for work-life initiatives. New York: Families and Work Institute, 1998.
29.
Giddens, A.Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (Eds), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.
30.
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine, 1967.
31.
Gonyea, J. & Googins, B.The restructuring of work and family in the United States: A new challenge for American corporations. In S. Lewis and J. Lewis (Eds), The work/family challenge: Rethinking employment. London: Sage, 1996, pp. 63-78.
32.
Goodstein, J.D.Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues . Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 350-382.
33.
Grover, S.L.Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 247-255.
34.
Haas, L. & Hwang, P.Company culture and men’s usage of family leave benefits in Sweden. Family Relations, 1995, 44, 28-36.
Hochschild, A.The time bind. New York: Metropolitan, 1997.
37.
Holt, H. & Thaulow, I.Formal and informal flexibility in organisations. In S. Lewis and J. Lewis (Eds), The work family challenge: Rethinking employment. London: Sage, 1996.
38.
Kitzinger, J.The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants . Sociology of Health and Illness, 1994, 16, 103-121.
39.
Kofman, E. & Sales, R.The geography of gender and welfare in Europe. In Maria Dolors, Garcia-Ramon and Janice Monk (Eds), Women of the E.U.: The politics of work and daily life. London: Routledge, 1996.
40.
Kossek, E.E & Oseki, C.Bridging the work-family policy and productivity gap: A literature review. Community, Work and Family, 1999, 2(1): 7-32.
41.
Kreuger, R.A.Analyzing and reporting focus group results: Focus Group Kit, Vol. 6. Newbury Park, CA. Sage, 1998.
42.
Kugelberg, C.Perceiving motherhood and fatherhood: Swedish working parents with young children. Uppsala: University of Uppsala Studies in Cultural Anthropology 26, 1999.
43.
Lerner, M.J.Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: Implications for comparable worth . Social Justice Research, 1987, 1, 107-125.
44.
Lewis, J.Gender and the development of welfare regimes . Journal of European Social Policy, 1992, 2(3), 159-173.
45.
Lewis, S.Sense of entitlement, family friendly policies and gender. In H. Holt and I. Thaulow (Eds), The role of companies in reconciling work and family lifeCopenhagen: Danish National Institute of Social Research, 1996.
46.
Lewis, S.Family friendly policies: A route to changing organisational change or playing around at the margins . Gender, Work and Organisation, 1997, 4, 13-23.
47.
Lewis, S. & Cooper, C.L.Career couples. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
48.
Lewis, S. & Lewis, J.Work family conflict: Can the law help?Legal and Criminological Psychology,1997, 2, 155-167.
49.
Lewis, S. , Kagan, C. & Heaton, P.Economic and psychological benefits from employment: The experiences of mothers of disabled children. Disability and Society, 1999, 14, 561-575.
50.
Lewis, S. , Smithson, J., Brannen, J., Das Dores Guerreiro, M., Kugelberg, C., Nilsen, A. & O’Connor, P.Futures on hold: Young Europeans talk about combining work and family life. Manchester: IOD research group, Manchester Metropolitan University, 1998.
51.
Major, B.Gender, entitlement and the distribution of family labor . Journal of Social Issues, 1993, 49(3), 141-159.
52.
Major, J.Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver and C. Hendrick (Eds), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 7. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987, pp. 124-148.
53.
Meehan, E. & Sevenhuijsen, S.Equality politics and gender. London: Sage, 1991.
54.
Montada, L. & Lerner, M.J. (Eds) Current societal concerns about justice.Critical issues in social justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1996.
55.
Morgan, D.L.Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
56.
Moss, P.Reconciling employment and family responsibilities: A European perspective. In S. Lewis and J. Lewis (Eds), The work family challenge: Rethinking employment. London: Sage, 1996.
57.
Myers, G.Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups . Language in Society, 1998, 27, 85-111.
58.
Nasman, E.Sweden and the reconciliation of work and family life. In L. den Dulk, A. van Doorne-Huiskes and J. Schippers (Eds), Work-family arrangements in Europe. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 1999, pp. 131-150.
59.
Nilsen, A.Forever young? A life course perspective on individualisation . Sociologia: Problemas e Praticas, 1998, 27(2), 59-78.
60.
Nilsen, A.Where is the future? Time and space as categories in analyses of young people’s images of the future . Innovation, 1999, 12(2), 175-194.
61.
O’Connor, P.A society in transition: Socially created problems and solutions Irish style . Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas, 1998, 27, 79-96.
62.
Pfau-Effinger, B.The gender contract and part-time work by women - Finland and Germany compared . Environment and Planning, 1994, 26, 1355-1376.
63.
Quilgars, D. & Abbott, D.Working in the risk society: Families perceptions of, and responses to, flexible labour markets and the restructuring of welfare. Community, Work and Family, 2000, 3, 15-36.
64.
Reichle, B.From is to ought and the kitchen sink: On the justice of distributions in close relationships. In Leo Montada and M.J. Lerner (Eds), Current societal concerns about justice.Critical issues in social justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1996.
65.
Rousseau, D.Promises in action: Psychological contracts in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1995.
66.
Siim, B.Welfare state, gender politics and equality policies: Women’s citizenship in the Scandinavian welfare states. In E. Meehan and S. Sevenhuijsen (Eds), Equality politics and gender. London: Sage, 1991, 175-192.
67.
Silverman, D.Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage, 1993.
68.
Smithson, J.Equal choices, different futures: Young adults talk about work and family expectations . Psychology of Women Section Review,1999, 1(2), 43-57.
69.
Smithson, J.Using and analysing focus groups: limitations and possibilities . International Journal of Methodology: Theory and Practice, 2000, 3(2), 103-119.
70.
Smithson, J. & Lewis, S.Is job insecurity changing the psychological contract? Young people’s expectations of work. Personnel Review,2000, 680-702.
71.
Thomas, L. & Ganster, D.Impact of family supportive work variables on work family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80, 6-15.
Wetherell, M. , Stiven, H. & Potter, J.Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1987, 26, 59-71.
74.
Wilkinson, S.Focus group methodology: A review . International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 1998, 1(3), 181-204.
