Using in-depth interviews with 74 men across different ranks in biology and physics at prestigious U.S. universities, the authors ask to what extent changing norms of fatherhood and a flexible workplace affect men working in a highly male-dominated profession and what variation exists in family forms. The authors conceptualize four typologies of men: those forgoing children, egalitarian partners, neotraditional dual earners, and traditional breadwinners. Findings suggest male scientists hold strong work devotions, yet a growing number seek egalitarian relationships, which they frame as reducing their devotion to work. The majority of men find the all-consuming nature of academic science conflicts with changing fatherhood norms.
AstoneN. M.DariotisJ. K.SonensteinF. L.PleckH. K.HynesK. (2010) Men’s work efforts and the transition to fatherhood. Journal of Family and Economic Issues31(1): 3–13.
2.
Blair-LoyM. (2003) Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
4.
BronsteinP.FarnsworthL. (1998) Gender differences in faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement. Research in Higher Education39(5): 557–585.
5.
ChaY. (2010) Reinforcing separate spheres. American Sociological Review75(2): 303–329.
6.
ColemanJ. (2005) The lazy husband: How to get men to do more parenting and housework, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
7.
ColtraneS. (2000) Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family62(4): 1208–1233.
8.
ColtraneS. (2004) Elite careers and family commitment: It’s (still) about gender. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science596(1): 214–220.
9.
CooperM. (2000) Being the ‘'go-to guy'': Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology23(4): 379–405.
10.
CreamerE. G. (2001) Working equal: Academic couples as collaborators, New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
11.
DamaskeS. (2011) For the family: How class and gender shape women’s work, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12.
DaviesB.HarreR. (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior20(1): 43–63.
13.
DragoR.ColbeckC.StaufferK. D.PirrettiA.BurkumK.FazioliJ.HabasevichT. (2006) The avoidance of bias against caregiving. American Behavioral Scientist49(9): 1222–1247.
14.
EcklundE. H.LincolnA. E. (2011) Scientists want more children. PLoS One6(8): e22590.
15.
EcklundE. H.LincolnA. E.TanseyC. (2012) Gender segregation in elite academic science. Gender and Society26(5): 693–717.
16.
FaulknerW. (2007) Nuts and bolts and people’s gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science37(3): 331–356.
17.
FoxM. F. (2005) Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science35(1): 131–150.
18.
FoxM. F. (2010) Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social-organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist53(7): 997–1012.
19.
FoxM. F.FonsecaC.BaoJ. (2011) Work and family conflict in academic science: Patterns and predictors among women and men in research universities. Social Studies of Science41(5): 715–735.
20.
FoxM. F.MohapatraS. (2007) Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education78(5): 542–571.
21.
FoxM. F.StephanP. E. (2001) Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects, and realities by gender and field. Social Studies of Science31(1): 109–122.
22.
GersonK. (1993) No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to family and work, New York, NY: Basic Books.
23.
GersonK. (2010) The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
GlavinP.SchiemanS. (2012) Work–family role blurring and work–family conflict: The moderating influence of job resources and job demands. Work and Occupations39(1): 71–98.
25.
HillR.TranbyE.KellyE.MoenP. (2013) Relieving the time squeeze? Effects of white-collar workplace change on parents. Journal of Marriage and Family75(4): 1014–1029.
26.
HochschildA. R. (1989) The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home, New York, NY: Viking.
27.
JacobsJ. A. (2004) Presidential address: The faculty time divide. Sociological Forum19(1): 3–27.
28.
JacobsJ. A.WinslowS. E. (2004) Overworked faculty: Job stresses and family demands. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science596(1): 104–129.
29.
KellerE. F. (1995) The origin, history, and politics of the subject called ‘'gender and science'': A first person account. In: JasanoffS.MarkleG. E.PetersenJ. C.PinchT. (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies, New York, NY: Sage, pp. 80–94.
30.
KellyE. L.AmmonsS. K.ChermackK.MoenP. (2010) Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white collar organization. Gender & Society24: 281–303.
31.
KellyE. L.MoenP.TranbyE. (2011) Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review76(2): 265–290.
32.
LatourB. (1987) Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LundbergS.RoseE. (2000) Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics7(6): 689–710.
34.
LundquistJ.MisraJ.O’MearaK. (2012) Parental leave usage by fathers and mothers at an American university. Fathering a Journal of Theory Research and Practice about Men as Fathers10(3): 337–363.
35.
MarotteM. R.ReynoldsP.SavareseR. J. (2011) Papa, PhD, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
36.
MasonM. A.WolfingerN.GouldenM. (2013) Do babies matter? Gender and family in the ivory tower, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
37.
MisraJ.LundquistJ. H.TemplerA. (2012) Gender, work time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum27(2): 300–323.
38.
MoenP.LamJ.AmmonsS.KellyE. L. (2013) Time work by overworked professionals: Strategies in response to the stress of higher status. Work and Occupations40(2): 79–114.
39.
MoenP.RoehlingP. (2005) The career mystique: Cracks in the American dream, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
National Research Council (1995) Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
41.
PerlowL. A.KellyE. L. (2014) Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work and Occupations41(1): 111–134.
42.
RaabeP. H. (1997) Work-family policies for faculty: How ‘'career-and-family friendly'' is academe? In: FerberM. A.LoebJ. W. (eds) Academic couples: Problems and promises, Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 208–225.
43.
SalleeM. W. (2012) The ideal worker or the ideal father: Organizational structures and culture in the gendered university. Research in Higher Education53(7): 782–802.
44.
SchiemanS.GlavinP.MilkieM. A. (2009) When work interferes with life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. American Sociological Review74(6): 966–988.
45.
ShapinS. (2008) The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
ShowsC.GerstelN. (2009) Fathering, class, and gender: A comparison of physicians and emergency medical technicians. Gender & Society23(2): 161–187.
47.
SolomonC. R. (2010) “The very highest thing is family'': Male assistant professors’ work/family management. Advances in Gender Research14: 233–255.
48.
StoneP. (2007) Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home, Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
SuitorJ. J.MecomD.FeldI. S. (2001) Gender, household labor, and scholarly productivity among university professors. Gender Issues19(4): 50–67.
50.
ThomasW. I.ThomasD. S. (1928) The child in America: Behavior problems and programs, New York, NY: Knopf.
51.
TierneyW. G.BensimonE. M. (1996) Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
52.
UsdanskyM. (2011) The gender-equality paradox: Class and incongruity between work-family attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Family Theory & Review3(3): 163–178.
WangX.XuS.PengL.WangZ.WangC.ZhangC.WangX. (2012) Exploring scientists’ working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime?Journal of Informetrics6(4): 655–660.
55.
WardK.Wolf-WendelL. (2004) Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. The Review of Higher Education27(2): 233–257.
56.
WardK.Wolf-WendelL. (2012) Academic motherhood: How faculty manage work and family, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
57.
WhittingtonK. B. (2011) Mothers of invention? Gender, motherhood, and new dimensions of productivity in the science profession. Work and Occupations38(3): 417–456.
58.
WinslowS. (2010) Gender inequality and time allocations among academic faculty. Gender & Society24(6): 769–793.
59.
WolfingerN. H.GouldenM.MasonM. A. (2010) Alone in the ivory tower. Journal of Family Issues31(12): 1652–1670.
60.
XieY.ShaumanK. A. (2003) Women in science: Career processes and outcomes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
