This paper reports a case study that analyzes changes in organizational boundary activities carried out in a bank during and after restructuring from a functional to a team-based structure. Results suggest that the need for spanning, buffering, and bringing up boundaries does not disappear as organizations become `boundaryless'. Rather, boundary activities increase in significance and migrate to lower organizational levels. Several propositions are generated for future research.
Alderfer, C.P.An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987, pp. 190-222.
2.
Ancona, D.G.Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in the organization . Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33(2), 334-365.
3.
Ancona, D.G. & Caldwell, D.F.Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Groups & Organization Studies, 1988, 13(4), 468-494.
4.
Ancona, D.G. & Caldwell, D.F.Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37(4), 634-665.
5.
Arthur, M. & Rousseau, D.The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
6.
Ashkenas, R. , Ulrich, D., Jick, T. & Kerr, S.The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
7.
Denison, D.R. , Hart, S.L. & Kahn, J.A.From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(4), 1005-1023.
8.
Diesing, P.Patterns of discovery in the social sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.
9.
Donnellon, A. & Scully, M.Teams, performance, and rewards: Will the postbureaucratic organization be a post-meritocratic organization? In C. Hackscher and A. Donnellon (Eds), The post-bureaucratic organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
10.
Hirschhorn, L. & Gilmore, T.The new boundaries of the `boundaryless' company. Harvard Business Review, 1992, May-June, 104-115.
11.
Katz, D. & Kahn, R.The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1978.
12.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E.Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.
13.
Nadler, D. , Gerstein, M., Shaw, R. & Associates. Organizational architecture: Designs for changing organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 1992.
14.
Scott, W.R.Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems, 3rd edn.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.
15.
Strauss, A.Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 1987.
16.
Thompson, J.D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
17.
Victor, B. & Stephens, C.The dark side of the new organizational forms: An editorial essay. Organization Science, 1994, 5(4), 479-482.
18.
Yan, A. & Louis, M.R.Migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations, 1999, 52(1), 25-47.
19.
Yin, R.K.Case study research: Design and methods, revised edn.Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
