Using a case study of a new biotechnology firm, we examine the formation of a new organizational form as a hybrid emerging from two `parent' organizational forms. We focus on key internal labor processes that are selected from existing organizations and replicated in the hybrid form and argue that this inheritance process strengthens the likelihood of survival of the new form. We propose that analyzing the micro-level processes of inheritance contributes to the understanding of macro-level phenomena of organizational births and deaths, examined by population ecologists.
Abernathy, W.J. & Clark, K.B.Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 1985, 14, 3-22.
2.
Aldrich, H.E. & Pfeffer, J.Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 1976, 2, 79-105.
3.
Argyres, N.S. & Liebeskind, J.P.Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1998, 35, 427-454.
4.
Arora, A. & Gambardella, A.Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capabilities, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1994, 24, 91-114.
5.
Arthur, J.B.Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover . Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 670-687.
6.
Bacharach, S.Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 496-515.
7.
Baum, J.A.C. & Singh, J.V.Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary processes: Some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution. In J.A.C. Baum and J.V. Singh (Eds), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 3-22.
8.
Burns, L.R.Physician practice management companies . Health Care Management Review, 1997, 22, 32-46.
9.
Burrill, S.G. with the Ernst and Young High Technology Group. Biotech 90: Into the next decade. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, 1989.
10.
Burt, R.Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Chandler, A.Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
13.
Crane, D.Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
14.
DeCenzo, D.A. & Robbins, S.P.Human resource management. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996.
15.
Dodgson, M.Learning, trust, and technological collaboration . Human Relations, 1993, 46, 77-95.
16.
Eisenhardt, K.M.Building theory from case research . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 4, 532-550.
17.
Fligstein, N.The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919-1979 . American Sociological Review, 1985, 50, 377-391.
18.
Hannan, M.T. & Carroll, G.R.Dynamics of organizational populations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
19.
Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J.The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83, 929-984.
20.
Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J.Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 1984, 49, 149-164.
21.
Huselid, M.A.The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance . Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 39, 635-672.
22.
Hybels, R.C. & Popielarz, P.A.The iron law revisited: The formation of an interorganizational oligarchy through joint ventures in US biotechnology. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Cincinnati, August 1996.
23.
Jackson, S.E. & Schuler, R.S.Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 1995, 46, 237-264.
24.
Kenney, M.Biotechnology: The university industry complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.
25.
Kornberg, A.The golden helix: Inside biotech ventures. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, 1995.
26.
Kreiner, K. & Schultz, M.Informal collaboration in R&D: The formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies, 1993, 14, 189-209.
27.
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979.
28.
Ledford, G.E. & Lawler, E.E., IIIResearch on employee participation: Beating a dead horse?Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19, 633-636.
29.
Lewin, A.Y. , Long, C.P. & Carroll, T.N.The evolution of new organization forms. Working Paper 97-07-01, Duke University Fuqua School of Business, 1997.
30.
Liebeskind, J.P. & A.L. Oliver. From handshake to contract: Intellectual property, trust and the social structure of academic research. In C. Lane and R. Bachmann (Eds), Between Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, 118-145.
31.
Liebeskind, J. , Oliver, A.L., Zucker, L. & Brewer, M.Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 1996, 7, 428-443.
32.
McKelvey, B.Organizational systematics: Taxonomy, classification, evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982.
33.
McKelvey, B. & Aldrich, H.Populations, natural selection, and applied organizational science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 101-128.
34.
Miner, A.S.Seeking adaptive advantage: Evolutionary theory and managerial action. In J.A.C. Baum and J.V. Singh (Eds), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations, New York: Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 76-89.
35.
Nonaka, I.Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in Japanese firms . California Management Review, 1988, 12, 53-65.
36.
Nonaka, I.A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation . Organization Science, 1994, 5, 14-37.
37.
North Carolina Biotechnology Center. US Company Database. Research Triangle Park, NC, 1991.
38.
Oliver, A. New biotechnology firms: A multilevel analysis of interorganizational relations in an emerging industry: Bringing process into structure. PhD dissertation, UCLA, 1993.
39.
Ouchi, W.J. , & Jagger, A.M.Type Z organization: Stability in the midst of mobility. Academy of Management Review, 1978, 3, 305-314.
40.
Pisano, G.P.The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35, 153-176.
41.
Powell, W.W.Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In L.L. Cummings and B. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990, pp. 295-336.
42.
Powell, W.W & Brantley, P.Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks? In N. Nohria and R.G. Eccles (Eds), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992, pp. 366-394.
43.
Powell, W.W. & Owen-Smith, J.Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1998, 17, 253-277.
44.
Powell, W.W. , Koput, K.W & Smith-Doerr, L.Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41, 116-145.
45.
Quinn, J.B.Innovation and corporate strategy: Managed chaos. In M. Horwitch (Ed.), Technology in the modern corporation: A strategic perspective. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 1986, 107-183.
46.
Rappa, M.A.Assessing the emergence of new technologies: The case of compound semiconductors. In A.H. Van de Ven, H.L. Angel and M.S. Poole (Eds), Research on the management of innovation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1989, pp. 439-464.
47.
Romanelli, E.The evolution of new organizational forms . Annual Review of Sociology, 1991, 17, 79-103.
48.
Schumpeter, J.A.The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934/1975.
49.
Selznick, P.Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.
50.
Stinchcomb, A.L.Social structure and organizations. In J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, pp. 153-193.
51.
Sutton, R.The virtues of closet qualitative research . Organization Science, 1997, 8, 97-106.
52.
Teece, D.J.Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1992, 18, 1-25.
53.
Tushman, M. & Anderson, P.Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 439-465.
54.
Van de Ven, A.H. & Garud, H.L.A framework for understanding the emergence of new industries. In R.S. Rosenbloom and R.A. Burgelman (Eds), Research on technological innovation, management and policy. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1989, pp. 195-225.
55.
Volberda, W.H.Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments . Organization Science, 1996, 3, 359-374.
56.
Weick, K.Re-punctuating the problem. In P.S. Goodman, J.M. Pennings and Associates (Eds), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1977, pp. 193-225.
57.
Yin, R.Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.
58.
Youndt, M.A. , Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. & Lepak, D.P.Human resources management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39, 836-866.
59.
Young, R.Is population ecology a useful paradigm for the study of organizations?American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94, 1-24.
