Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Current emergency response literature rarely focuses on the intersecting experiences of people with disabilities and first responders. This study employed a person-centered Human Factors approach to assess the experiences of people with disabilities and first responders during emergencies. This research identifies environmental and societal factors that hinder emergency response outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a needs assessment of 126 individuals (95 people with disabilities and 31 first responders). The survey included Likert-style items and open-ended responses. Open-ended items were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. An exploratory sentiment analysis was conducted to examine the alignment between qualitative and quantitative responses.

Results

Three major themes emerged: communication barriers, insufficient training, and limited resources. People with disabilities emphasized the importance of respectful, clear, and adaptive communication, while first responders noted challenges related to time constraints, tools, and accessible communication methods. Participants from both groups emphasized the urgent need for technology and training that can provide first responders with the necessary knowledge and skills to improve outcomes for people with disabilities.

Conclusion

This needs assessment offers foundational insights into barriers that impact emergency response for people with disabilities and first responders. Actionable Human Factors solutions are proposed.

Application

The continued presence of barriers and tensions between the needs of people with disabilities and first responders suggests that Human Factors interventions should be developed to improve communication systems and equipment, training protocols, work systems, and environmental design for accessibility for people with disabilities, while also considering the safety and time-sensitive needs of first responders.

Keywords

patient–provider communication disaster response mental disabilities physical disabilities training evaluation patient safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADA National Network . (2025). What is the definition of disability under the ADA? ADA national network. ADA National Network. https://adata.org/faq/what-definition-disability-under-ada

Alexander

(2015). Disability and disaster: An overview. In Kelman

Stough

L. M.

(Eds.), Disability and disaster: Explorations and exchanges (pp. 15–29). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137486004_2

American Foundation for the Blind . (2024). Screen readers. The American Foundation for the Blind. https://www.afb.org/blindness-and-low-vision/using-technology/assistive-technology-products/screen-readers

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun

Clarke

(2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in palliative medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine, 38(6), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800

Braun

Tricklebank

Clarke

(2013). “It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach”: Meaning, gender, and the hairy/hairless body. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313492950

Butler

Bowers

Andrew

Sabrina

C.-H.

, et al. (2023). Decision Making Within and Outside Standard Operating Procedures: Paradoxical Use of Operational Discretion in Firefighters. Human Factors, 65(7), 1422–1434. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211041860

Byrne

(2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality and Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Catchpole

Privette

Roberts

Alfred

Carter

Woltz

Wilson

Crookes

(2022). A smartphone application for teamwork and communication in trauma: Pilot evaluation “in the Wild”. Human Factors, 64(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211021717

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2024). Disability impacts all of us infographic CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/disability-and-health/articles-documents/disability-impacts-all-of-us-infographic.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/infographic-disability-impacts-all.html

11.

Chang

K. J.

Villeneuve

Crawford

Yen

Dominey-Howes

Llewellyn

(2023). Disaster preparedness, capabilities, and support needs: The lived experience perspectives of people with disability. Disabilities, 3(4), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities3040042

12.

Chomczyński

(2008). Software review: QDA MINER - The mixed method solution for qualitative analysis by provalis research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 4(2), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.4.2.06

13.

Choong

Y.-Y.

Salvendy

(2021). Voices of first responders – Applying human factors and ergonomics knowledge to improve the usability of public safety communications technology: Findings from user-centered interviews, phase 1 (5). NIST. https://www.nist.gov/publications/voices-first-responders-applying-human-factors-and-ergonomics-knowledge-improve

14.

Dawkins

Buchanan

Prettyman

S. S.

(2021). Voices of first responders—nationwide public safety communication survey findings: Day to day technology, phase 2 (3). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8400

15.

Dawkins

Greene

K. K.

Prettyman

S. S.

(2020). Voices of first responders—nationwide public safety communication survey findings: Mobile devices, applications, and futuristic technology, phase 2 (2). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8314

16.

Duron

(2021). “Shots fired! We have many people down!”: Common recommendations for managing high-casualty active shooter events in the USA. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 65, 102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102548

17.

Eadens

D. M.

Cranston-Gingras

Dupoux

Eadens

D. W.

(2016). Police officer perspectives on intellectual disability. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(1), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2015-0039

18.

Finkelstein

(2020). Emergency preparedness – The perceptions and experiences of people with disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 42(14), 2056–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1550686

19.

FitzGerald

Hurst

(2017). Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics, 18(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8

20.

Fox

M. H.

White

G. W.

Rooney

Rowland

J. L.

(2007). Disaster preparedness and response for persons with mobility impairments: Results from the university of Kansas nobody left behind study. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17(4), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073070170040201

21.

Gjøsæter

Radianti

Chen

(2021). Universal design of ICT for emergency management from stakeholders’ perspective: A systematic literature review. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(5), 1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10084-7

22.

Guastello

S. J.

(2010). Nonlinear dynamics of team performance and adaptability in emergency response. Human Factors, 52(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809359003

23.

Hansson

Orru

Siibak

Bäck

Krüger

Gabel

Morsut

(2020). Communication-related vulnerability to disasters: A heuristic framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101931. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJDRR.2020.101931

24.

Hoorens

(2014). Positivity bias. In Michalos

A. C.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 4938–4941). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2219

25.

Hutto

Gilbert

(2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550

26.

Interagency Coordinating Council on Emergency Preparedness, and Individuals with DisabilitiesDepartment of Homeland Security . (2006). Individuals with disabilities in emergency preparedness executive order 13347 [Progress report]. https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/icc-0506-progressreport.pdf

27.

Janesick

V. J.

(2015). Peer debriefing. In Ritzer

(Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology . John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp014.pub2

28.

Joseph

Chalil Madathil

Jafarifiroozabadi

Rogers

Mihandoust

Khasawneh

McNeese

Holmstedt

McElligott

J. T.

(2022). Communication and teamwork during telemedicine-enabled stroke care in an ambulance. Human Factors, 64(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720821995687

29.

Lagu

Haywood

Reimold

DeJong

Walker Sterling

Iezzoni

L. I.

(2022). ‘I am not the doctor for you’: Physicians’ attitudes about caring for people with disabilities. Health Affairs, 41(10), 1387–1395. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00475

30.

Levac

Toal-Sullivan

O’Sullivan

T. L.

(2012). Household emergency preparedness: A literature review. Journal of Community Health, 37(3), 725–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9488-x

31.

Malpass

West

Quaill

Barker

(2019). Experiences of individuals with disabilities sheltering during natural disasters: An integrative review. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 34(2), 60–65. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.379764292029961.

32.

Meischke

H. W.

Calhoun

R. E.

Yip

M.-P.

S.-P.

Painter

I. S.

(2013). The effect of language barriers on dispatching EMS response. Prehospital Emergency Care, 17(4), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2013.811565

33.

Metelmann

Müller

M. P.

Scquizzato

Baldi

Barry

Böttiger

B. W.

Busch

H.-J.

Caputo

M. L.

Cheskes

Cresta

Deakin

C. D.

Degraeuwe

Doshi

A. A.

Ekkel

M. M.

Elschenbroich

Fredman

Gamberini

Ganter

Greif

(2025). Defining the terminology of first responders alerted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by medical dispatch centres: An international consensus study on nomenclature. Resuscitation, 22, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100912

34.

National Council on Disability . (2014). Effective communications for people with disabilities before, during, and after emergencies (p. 200). National Council on Disability. https://ncd.gov/publications/2014/05272014

35.

Nowell

L. S.

Norris

J. M.

White

D. E.

Moules

N. J.

(2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

36.

Oving

Masterson

Tjelmeland

I. B. M.

Jonsson

Semeraro

Ringh

Truhlar

Cimpoesu

Folke

Beesems

S. G.

Koster

R. W.

Tan

H. L.

Blom

M. T.

ESCAPE-NET Investigators . (2019). First-response treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A survey of current practices across 29 countries in Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 27(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0689-0

37.

Patton

M. Q.

(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed, p. 532). Sage Publications, Inc.

38.

Perry

Jaffe

Bitan

(2022). Dynamic communication quantification model for measuring information management during mass-casualty incident simulations. Human Factors, 64(1), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211018880

39.

Prytz

Norén

Jonson

C.-O.

(2018). Fixation Differences in Visual Search of Accident Scenes by Novices and Expert Emergency Responders. Human Factors, 60(8), 1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818788142

40.

Rios

Magasi

Novak

Harniss

(2016). Conducting accessible research: Including people with disabilities in public health, epidemiological, and outcomes studies. American Journal of Public Health, 106(12), 2137–2144. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303448

41.

Rogers

Campbell

Pak

(2001). A systems approach for training older adults to use technology (pp. 187–208). Springer Publishing Company.

42.

Russ

A. L.

Fairbanks

R. J.

Karsh

B.-T.

Militello

L. G.

Saleem

J. J.

Wears

R. L.

(2013). The science of human factors: Separating fact from fiction. BMJ Quality and Safety, 22(10), 802–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001450

43.

Schwartz

J. K.

Unni

(2021). Inclusion of people with disabilities in research to improve medication adherence: A systematic review. Patient Preference and Adherence, 15, 1671–1677. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S314135

44.

Spall

(1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049800400208

45.

Trujillo-Falcón

J. E.

Pabón

A. R. G.

Ripberger

J. T.

Bitterman

Thornton

J. B.

Krocak

M. J.

Ernst

S. R.

Obeso

E. C.

Lipski

(2022). ¿Aviso o alerta? Developing effective, inclusive, and consistent watch and warning translations for U.S. Spanish speakers. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(12), E2791–E2803. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0050.1

46.

VanPuymbrouck

Friedman

Feldner

(2020). Explicit and implicit disability attitudes of healthcare providers. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000317

47.

Villeneuve

Abson

Pertiwi

Moss

(2021). Applying a person-centred capability framework to inform targeted action on disability inclusive disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 52(101979). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101979

48.

Walker

W. R.

Vogl

R. J.

Thompson

C. P.

(1997). Autobiographical memory: Unpleasantness fades faster than pleasantness over time. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(5), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<399::AID-ACP462>3.0.CO;2-E

49.

Wolf-Fordham

S. B.

Twyman

J. S.

Hamad

C. D.

(2014). Educating first responders to provide emergency services to individuals with disabilities. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 8(6), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2014.129

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Improving Emergency Response: A Qualitative Needs Assessment Involving People With Disabilities and First Responders

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Application

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material