The aim of this study is to replicate Berto’s (2005) heavily cited work on attention restoration.
Background
Nature interventions have gained increased interest for improving performance of attentionally demanding tasks. Berto (2005) indicated that viewing digital nature images could improve performance on a subsequent response inhibition task, the sustained attention to response task (SART). However, experimental design and statistical concerns about her experiments as well as failure to support her findings across multiple unpublished studies in our laboratory provided rationale for this replication study.
Method
Twenty participants were each assigned to one of three digital image conditions: nature, urban, and control. Participants performed the SART before and after digital image exposure.
Results
SART performance metrics (total correct target responses, mean response time, and transformed d′) were analyzed using 2 (SART) × 3 (image interventions) mixed design ANOVAs. The results failed to replicate Berto (2005).
Conclusion
Possible reasons for not replicating Berto (2005) are discussed, including (1) sample differences, (2) different testing environments and procedures, (3) insufficient attentional depletion, and (4) individual differences.
Applications
Research needs to determine the effectiveness of such interventions, the specific attention tasks that might benefit, and the individual difference variables relevant for attention restoration.
BarbieroG.BertoR. (2016). Introduzione alla biofilia. La relazione con la natura tra genetica e psicologia. Carocci Editori.
2.
BarbieroG.BertoR. (2018). From biophilia to naturalist intelligence passing through perceived restorativeness and connection to nature. Annals of Reviews and Research, 3, 1–6.
3.
BarbieroG.VenturellaA.MaculanN.MiroglioM.BertoR.CallegariG. (2017). The restorative schoolroom of Gressoney-La-Trinité as an example of biophilic design integrated in energetic efficiency retrofit [Poster presentation]. Proceedings of the 27th Congress of The Italian Society of Ecology, Napoli, 147.
4.
BertoR. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249–259.doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
5.
BertoR.BarbieroG. (2017). The biophilic quality index: A tool to improve a building from “green” to restorative. Visions for Sustainability, 8, 38–45.
6.
BertoR.BarbieroG.BarbieroP.SenesG. (2018). An individual’s connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments. Some observations about biophilia. Behavioral Sciences, 8, 34.doi:10.3390/bs8030034
7.
BertoR.BaroniM. R.DamianiD.DuchekJ. (2015). Can exposure to fascinating stimuli affect memory performance in mentally fatigued people? A study on encoding and retrieval. International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, 2, 1–6.
8.
CarterL.RussellP. N.HeltonW. S. (2013). Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 82, 35–42.doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.00223501702
9.
CassarinoM.MaistoM.EspositoY.GuerreroD.ChanJ. S.SettiA. (2019). Testing attention restoration in a virtual reality driving simulator. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–7.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00250
10.
CraigC. (2016). The green mind: Examining the intersection of executive and sustained attention with restorative environments [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas Tech University
11.
CraigC.KleinM. I.MenonC. V.RinaldoS. B. (2015). Digital nature benefits typical individuals but not individuals with depressive symptoms. Ecopsychology, 7, 53–58.doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0057
12.
DillardM. B.WarmJ. S.FunkeG. J.FunkeM. E.FinomoreV. S.MatthewsG.ShawT. H.ParasuramanR. (2014). The sustained attention to response task (SART) does not promote mindlessness during vigilance performance. Human Factors, 56, 1364–1379.doi:10.1177/001872081453752125509819
13.
DjamasbiS.SiegelM.SkorinkoJ.TullisT. (2011). Online viewing and aesthetic preferences of Generation Y and the Baby Boom generation: Testing user web site experience through eye tracking. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 121–158.doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415150404
14.
FunkeG.FunkeM.DillardM.FinomoreV.ShawT.EplingS.WarmJ. S.ParasuramanR. (2012). Cerebral hemovelocity and the sustained attention to response task. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp.1436–1440). SAGE Publications.doi:10.1177/1071181312561405
15.
GrierR. A.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.MatthewsG.GalinskyT. L.ParasuramanR. (2003). The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness. Human Factors, 45, 349–359.doi:10.1518/hfes.45.3.349.2725314702988
16.
HägerhällC. M.Ode SangÅsa.EnglundJ. -E.AhlnerF.RybkaK.HuberJ.BurenhultN. (2018). Do humans really prefer semi-open natural landscapes? A cross-cultural reappraisal. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–14.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00822
17.
HartigT.StaatsH. (2005). Linking preference for environments with their restorative quality. InTressB.TressG.FryG.OpdamP. (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning (pp.279–292). Springer.
18.
HeadJ.WilsonK.HeltonW. S.KempS. (2013, September). The role of calmness in a high-go target detection task. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp.838–842). SAGE Publications.
19.
HeltonW. S.HollanderT. D.WarmJ. S.MatthewsG.DemberW. N.WallaartM.BeauchampG.ParasuramanR.HancockP. A. (2005). Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 249–261.doi:10.1348/000712605X3836915969834
20.
HeltonW. S.KernR. P.WalkerD. R. (2009). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs and the role of emotional stimuli on the sustained attention to response task (SART). InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 53, No. 17, pp.1052–1056). SAGE Publications.doi:10.1177/154193120905301702
21.
HeltonW. S.LopezN.TammingaS. (2008). Performance on a sustained attention to response task. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 52, No. 18, pp.1214–1218). SAGE Publications.doi:10.1177/154193120805201813
22.
HockeyG. R. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 75–93.doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(96)05223-49083645
23.
HuntR.EllisH. (2004). Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
24.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.
25.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (2011). Well‐being, reasonableness, and the natural environment. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3, 304–321.
26.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
27.
KaplanS.BermanM. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43–57.doi:10.1177/174569160935678426162062
28.
KaplanS.KaplanR. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. Ulrich’s Books.
29.
KeppelG.WickensT. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
30.
LeeK. E.WilliamsK. J. H.SargentL. D.WilliamsN. S. G.JohnsonK. A. (2015). 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 182–189.doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003
31.
ManlyT.RobertsonI. H.GallowayM.HawkinsK. (1999). The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37, 661–670.doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00127-410390027
32.
MatthewsG.CampbellS. E. (1998, October). Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 42, No. 11, pp.821–825). SAGE Publications.
33.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
34.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.
35.
NousiainenM.LindroosH.HeinoP. (2016). Restorative environment design. Kymenlaakso University of Applied Sciences publications, Series A. Nr 76.
36.
OhlyH.WhiteM. P.WheelerB. W.BethelA.UkoumunneO. C.NikolaouV.GarsideR. (2016). Attention restoration theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 19, 305–343.doi:10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155
37.
ParsonsR. (1991). The potential influences of environmental perception on human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 1–23.doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80002-7
38.
RobertsonI. H.ManlyT.AndradeJ.BaddeleyB. T.YiendJ. (1997). 'Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-89204482
39.
StaatsH. (2012). Restorative environments. InClaytonS. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp.445–458). Oxford University Press.
40.
StanislawH.TodorovN. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.doi:10.3758/BF0320770410495845
41.
StevensonM. P.SchilhabT.BentsenP. (2018). Attention restoration theory II: A systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 21, 227–268.doi:10.1080/10937404.2018.150557130130463
42.
TangI. C.SullivanW. C.ChangC. Y. (2015). Perceptual evaluation of natural landscapes: The role of the individual connection to nature. Environment & Behavior, 47, 595–617.
43.
TennessenC. M.CimprichB. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77–85.doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0
44.
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. A.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230.doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
45.
WarmJ. S.ParasuramanR.MatthewsG. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441.doi:10.1518/001872008X31215218689050
46.
WickensC. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. InNickersonR. (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp.239–257). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
47.
WickensC. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. InDamosD. (Ed.), Multiple task performance (pp.3–34). Taylor & Francis Ltd.
48.
WickensC. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, 449–455.doi:10.1518/001872008X28839418689052
49.
YerkesR. M.DodsonJ. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482.doi:10.1002/cne.920180503
