Perspectives of End Users on the Potential Use of Trunk Exoskeletons for People With Low-Back Pain: A Focus Group Study

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to identify criteria to be considered when developing an exoskeleton for low-back pain patients by exploring the perceptions and expectations of potential end users.

Background

Psychosocial, psychological, physical load, and personality influence incidence of low-back pain. Body-worn assistive devices that passively support the user’s trunk, that is exoskeletons, can decrease mechanical loading and potentially reduce low-back pain. A user-centered approach improves patient safety and health outcomes, increases user satisfaction, and ensures usability. Still, previous studies have not taken psychological factors and the early involvement of end users into account.

Method

We conducted focus group studies with low-back pain patients (n = 4) and health care professionals (n = 8). Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, using the general inductive approach. The focus group discussions included trying out an available exoskeleton. Questions were designed to elicit opinions about exoskeletons, desired design specifications, and usability.

Results

Important design characteristics were comfort, individual adjustability, independency in taking it on and off, and gradual adjustment of support. Patients raised concerns over loss of muscle strength. Health care professionals mentioned the risk of confirming disability of the user and increasing guarded movement in patients.

Conclusion

The focus groups showed that implementation of a trunk exoskeleton to reduce low-back pain requires an adequate implementation strategy, including supervision and behavioral coaching.

Application

For health care professionals, the optimal field of application, prevention or rehabilitation, is still under debate. Patients see potential in an exoskeleton to overcome their limitations and expect it to improve their quality of life.

Keywords

assistive device design requirements user-centered approach qualitative patients

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdoli-Eramaki

Stevenson

J. M.

Reid

S. A.

Bryant

T. J.

(2007). Mathematical and empirical proof of principle for an on-body Personal Lift Augmentation Device (PLAD). Journal of Biomechanics, 40, 1694–1700.

Balagué

Mannion

A. F.

Pellisé

Cedraschi

(2012). Non-specific low back pain. The Lancet, 397, 482–491.

Baltrusch

S. J.

van Dieën

J. H.

van Bennekom

C. A. M.

Houdijk

(2018). The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals. Applied Ergonomics, 72, 94–106.

Björck-van Dijken

Fjellman-Wiklund

Hildingsson

. (2008). Low back pain, lifestyle factors and physical activity: A population-based study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 864–869.

Braun

Clarke

(2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London, England: SAGE.

Bruseberg

McDonagh-Philp

(2002). Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: A review based on current literature and designers’ feedback. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 27–38.

Clarke

Judge

Heron

Langley

Hosking

Hawley

M. S.

(2011). User involvement in the early development of assistive technology devices. In Gelderblom

G. J.

Soede

Adriaens

Miesenberger

(Eds.), Assistive Technology Research Series: Everyday technology for independence and care—AAATE 2011 (Vol. 29, pp. 362–373). Maastricht, The Netherlands: IOS Press.

Darlow

Fullen

B. M.

Dean

Hurley

D. A.

Baxter

G. D.

Dowell

. (2012). The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 16, 3–17.

Davis

K. G.

Marras

W. S.

(2000). The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics. Clinical Biomechanics, 15, 703–717.

10.

Davis

K. G.

Marras

W. S.

Heaney

C. A.

Waters

T. R.

Gupta

(2002). The impact of mental processing and pacing on spine loading: 2002 Volvo Award in biomechanics. Spine, 27, 2645–2653.

11.

de Looze

M. P.

Bosch

Krause

Stadler

K. S.

O’Sullivan

L. W

. (2016). Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics, 59, 671–681.

12.

De Vito Dabbs

Myers

B. A.

Mc Curry

K. R.

Dunbar-Jacob

Hawkins

R. P.

Begey

Dew

M. A.

(2009). User-centered design and interactive health technologies for patients. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 27, 175–183.

13.

Faber

G. S.

Kingma

van Dieën

J. H.

(2007). The effects of ergonomic interventions on low back moments are attenuated by changes in lifting behaviour. Ergonomics, 50, 1377–1391.

14.

Gosbee

(2002). Human factors engineering and patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11, 352–354.

15.

Graham

R. B.

Agnew

M. J.

Stevenson

J. M.

(2009). Effectiveness of an on-body lifting aid at reducing low back physical demands during an automotive assembly task: Assessment of EMG response and user acceptability. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 936–942.

16.

Griffith

L. E.

Shannon

H. S.

Wells

R. P.

Walter

S. D.

Cole

D. C.

Cote

. . . Langlois

L. E.

(2012). Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 309–318.

17.

Harrison

Dowswell

Milewa

(2002). Guest editorial: Public and user “involvement” in the UK National Health Service. Health & Society Care in the Community, 10(2), 63–66.

18.

Hill

Holloway

C. S.

Morgado Ramirez

D. Z.

Smitham

Pappas

(2017). What are user perspectives of exoskeleton technology? A literature review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 33, 160–167.

19.

Hodges

P. W.

Tucker

(2011). Moving differently in pain: A new theory to explain the adaptation to pain. Pain, 152, 90–98.

20.

Hoozemans

M. J. M.

Kingma

de Vries

W. H. K.

(2008). Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading. Ergonomics, 51, 1053–1063.

21.

Kazerooni

(2002). Human power amplifier for lifting load including apparatus for preventing slack in lifting cable. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

22.

Kingma

Bosch

Bruins

van Dieën

J. H

. (2004). Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: Effects on low back loading. Ergonomics, 47(13), 1365–1385.

23.

Kitzinger

(1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302.

24.

Koopman

A. S.

Kingma

Faber

G. S.

de Looze

M. P.

van Dieën

J. H.

(2019). Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks. Journal of Biomechanics, 83, 97–103.

25.

Leape

L. L.

(2009). Errors in medicine. Clinical Chimica Acta, 404, 2–5.

26.

Linton

S. J.

(2000). A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine, 25, 1148–1156.

27.

Marras

W. S.

(2012). The complex spine: The multidimensional system of causal pathways for low-back disorders. Human Factors, 54, 881–889.

28.

Marras

W. S.

Davis

K. G.

Heaney

C. A.

Maronitis

A. B.

Allread

W. G.

(2000). The influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on mechanical loading of the lumbar spine. Spine, 25, 3045–3054.

29.

O’Sullivan

(2011). It’s time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46, 224–227.

30.

Pincus

Burton

A. K.

Vogel

Field

A. P.

(2002). A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low-back pain. Spine, 27(5), E109–E120.

31.

Rahman

Reed

Underwood

Shipley

Omar

(2008). Factors affecting self-efficacy and pain intensity in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain seen in a specialist rheumatology pain clinic. Rheumatology, 47, 1803–1808.

32.

Stevens

M. L.

Steffens

Ferreira

M. L.

Latimer

Blyth

Maher

C. G.

(2016). Patients’ and physiotherapists’ views on triggers for low-back pain. Spine, 41, E218–E224.

33.

Stewart

D. W.

Shamdasani

P. N.

Rook

D. W.

(2015). Focus groups: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

34.

Trippolini

M. A.

Janssen

Hilfiker

Oesch

(2018). Measurement properties of the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): Is it reliable and valid in workers with chronic musculoskeletal pain? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 28, 322–331.

35.

Ulrey

B. L.

Fathallah

F. A.

(2013). Effect of a personal weight transfer device on muscle activities and joint flexions in the stooped posture. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 23, 195–205.

36.

van Dieën

J. H.

Flor

Hodges

P. W

. (2017). Low-back pain patients learn to adapt motor behavior with adverse secondary consequences. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 45, 223–229.

37.

Wehner

Rempel

Kazerooni

(2009). Lower extremity exoskeleton reduces back forces in lifting. In ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 49–56). Hollywood, CA. Retrieved from https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/DSCC/proceedings-abstract/DSCC2009/48937/49/346802

38.

Woby

S. R.

Urmston

Watson

P. J.

(2007). Self-efficacy mediates the relation between pain-related fear and outcome in chronic low back pain patients. European Journal of Pain, 11, 711–718.