To provide an evaluative synthesis of the life and scientific contributions of the late Joel Warm.
Background:
As the doyen of vigilance research, Joel Warm expanded our understanding and horizons concerning this critical response capacity. However, he also made widespread and profound contributions to many other areas of perception and applied psychology, as we elucidate here.
Method:
Using archival sources, personal histories, and analysis of extant literature documenting Warm’s own productivity, we articulate his life in science.
Results:
Our synthesis illustrates the continued, broad, influential, and expanding impact that one individual can exert on diverse fields of study. Whole bodies of understanding of human behavior have been illuminated by his exemplary career.
Application
By understanding his path to success in applied experimental psychology, we anticipate that others will be motivated, inspired, and guided to replicate and even outstrip a lifetime of such seminal and influential contributions. The presence of individuals such as Warm serves as a primary motive in enhancing Humans Factors/Ergonomics Science.
AdamsJ. A.BoultonL. R. (1962). An evaluation of the activationist hypothesis of human vigilance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 495–504.
2.
BeckerA. B.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.HancockP. A. (1995). Effects of jet engine noise and performance feedback on perceived workload in a monitoring task. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5(1), 49–62.
BroadbentD. E.GregoryM. (1965). Effects of noise and signal rate upon vigilance analyzed by means of decision theory. Human Factors, 7, 155–162.
5.
BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (1963). Vigilance: A symposium. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
6.
DaviesD. R.ParasuramanR. (1982). Psychology of Vigilance. London, England: Academic Press.
7.
DaviesD. R.TuneG. S. (1970). Human vigilance performance. London, UK: Staples Press.
8.
DemberW. N.WarmJ. S. (1979). Psychology of perception. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
9.
FrankenhaeuserM. (1986). A psychobiological framework for research on human stress and coping. In Dynamics of stress: Physiological, psychological and social perspectives. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
10.
FrankenhaeuserM.NordhedenB.MyrstenA. L.PostB. (1971). Psychophysiological reactions to understimulation and overstimulation. Acta Psychologica, 35, 298–308.
11.
FrankmannJ. P.AdamsJ. A. (1962). Theories of vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 59, 257–272.
12.
FrauliniN. W.HancockG. M.NeigelA. R.ClaypooleV. L.SzalmaJ. L. (2017). A critical examination of the research and theoretical underpinnings discussed in Thomson, Besner, and Smilek (2016). Psychological Review, 124, 525–531.
13.
GopherD.DonchinE. (1986). Workload: An examination of the concept. In BoffK. R.KaufmanL.ThomasJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. Volume II (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.
14.
GreenleeE. T.DeLuciaP. R.NewtonD. C. (2019). Driver vigilance in automated vehicles: Effects of demands on hazard detection performance. Human Factors. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0018720818802095
15.
GrierR. A.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.MatthewsG.GalinskyT. L.SzalmaJ. L.ParasuramanR. (2003). The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention not mindlessness. Human Factors, 45, 349–359.
16.
HancockP. A. (1984). Environmental stressors. In WarmJ. S. (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 103–142). New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
HancockP. A. (1993). Body temperature influences on time perception. Journal of General Psychology, 120, 197–216.
18.
HancockP. A. (1996). Effect of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload. Ergonomics, 39, 1146–1162.
19.
HancockP. A. (2008). Frederic Bartlett: Through the lens of prediction. Ergonomics, 51(1), 30–34.
20.
HancockP. A. (2013). In search of vigilance: The problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. American Psychologist, 68, 97–109.
21.
HancockP. A. (2017). On the nature of vigilance. Human Factors, 59(1), 35–43.
22.
HancockP. A.BaldwinC.WarmJ. S.SzalmaJ. L. (2017). Between two worlds: Discourse on the vigilant and sustained contributions of Raja Parasuraman. Human Factors, 59(1), 28–34.
23.
HancockP. A.CairdJ. K. (1993). Experimental evaluation of a model of mental workload. Human Factors, 35(3), 413–429.
24.
HancockP. A.MatthewsG. (2019). Workload and performance: Associations, insensitivities, and dissociations. Human Factors. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0018720818809590
25.
HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.). (1988). Human mental workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
26.
HancockP. A.VolanteW.SzalmaJ. L. (2016). Defeating the vigilance decrement. IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 4, 151–163.
27.
HancockP. A.WarmJ. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.
28.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
29.
HeltonW. S.WarmJ. S.TrippL. D.MatthewsG.ParasuramanR.HancockP. A. (2010). Cerebral lateralization of vigilance: A function of task difficulty. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1683–1688.
30.
HoffmanR. R.BolesD. B.SzalmaJ. L.HancockP. A. (2018). WarmJoel S. (1933-2017). American Journal of Psychology, 131, 227–229.
31.
HoffmanR. R.HancockP. A.ParasuramanR.SzalmaJ. L.ScerboM. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of applied perception research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
JerisonH. J. (1963). On the decrement function in human vigilance. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium (pp. 199–212). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
33.
JerisonH. J.PickettR. M. (1963). Vigilance: A review and reevaluation. Human Factors, 7, 107–128.
34.
LongoL.Chiara-LevaM. (Eds.). (2017). Human mental workload: Models and applications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
35.
MackieR. R. (Ed.). (1977). Vigilance: Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates. New York: Plenum Press.
36.
MackworthN. H. (1950). Researches on the measurement of human performance. London, England: His Majesty’s Stationary Office.
37.
O’DonnellR. D.EggemeierF. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In BoffK. R.KaufmanL.ThomasJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance II (pp. 42–49). New York, NY: Wiley.
38.
O’HanlonJ. F. (1965). Adrenaline and noradrenaline: Relation to performance in a visual vigilance task. Science, 150, 507–509.
39.
NatsoulasT. (1967). What are perceptual reports about?Psychological Bulletin, 67(4), 249–272.
40.
ParasuramanR. (1979). Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science, 205, 924–927.
41.
RobertsonI. H.GaravanH. (2004). Vigilance attention. In GazzanigaM. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 563–578). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
42.
RobertsonI. H.ManlyT.AndradeJ.BaddeleyB. T.YiendJ. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.
43.
ShawT. H.ParasuramanR.SikdarS.WarmJ. (2009). Knowledge of results and signal salience modify vigilance performance and cerebral hemovelocity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53, 1062–1065.
44.
SzalmaJ. L.HancockP. A.DemberW. N.WarmJ. S. (2006). Training for vigilance: The effect of KR format and dispositional optimism and pessimism on performance and stress. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 115–135.
45.
SzalmaJ. L.HancockP. A.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.ParsonsK. S. (2006). Training for vigilance: Using predictive power to evaluate feedback effectiveness. Human Factors, 48, 682–689.
46.
SzalmaJ. L.WarmJ. S.MatthewsG.DemberW. N.WeilerE. M.MeierA.EggemeierT. (2004). Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance workload and stress in sustained attention. Human Factors, 46, 219–233.
47.
TempleJ. G.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.JonesK. S.LaGrangeC. M.MatthewsG. (2000). The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Human Factors, 42(2), 183–194.
48.
ThackrayJ.BaileyP.TouchstoneR. M. R. I. (1975). Physiological, subjective, and performance correlates of reported boredom and monotony while performing a simulated radar control task. In MackieR. R. (Ed.), Vigilance: Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates (pp. 203–215). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
49.
ThackrayR. I. (1981). The stress of boredom and monotony: A consideration of the evidence. Psychosomatic Medicine, 43, 165–176.
50.
ThackrayR. I.JonesK. N.TouchstoneR. M. (1974). Personality and physiological correlates of performance decrement on a monotonous task requiring sustained attention. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 351–358.
51.
ThomsonD. R.BesnerD.SmilekD. (2016). A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks. Psychological Review, 123(1), 70–83.
52.
WarmJ. S. (Ed.). (1984). Sustained attention in human performance. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
53.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N. (1998). Test of a vigilance taxonomy. In HoffmanR. R.SherrickM. F.WarmJ. S. (Eds.), Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember (pp. 87–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.HancockP. A. (1996). Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 183–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.ParasuramanR. (1991). Effects of olfactory stimulation on performance and stress. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, 42(3), 199–210.
56.
WarmJ. S.FinomoreV. S.VidulichM. A.FunkeM. E. (2015). Vigilance: A perceptual challenge. In HoffmanR. R.HancockP. A.ScerboM. W.ParasuramanR.SzalmaJ. L. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of applied perception research (Vol. 1, pp. 241–283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
WarmJ. S.MorrisJ. R.KewJ. K. (1963). Temporal judgment as a function of nosological classification and experimental method. The Journal of Psychology, 66, 287–297.
58.
WarmJ. S.ParasuramanR.MatthewsG. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441.
59.
WarmJ. S.SeemanW.BeanL. H.ChinN.WesslingN. F. (1977). Meditation and sustained attention. Washington, DC: Psychonomic society.
60.
WickensC. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50(3), 449–455.
61.
WienerE. L. (1987). Application of vigilance research: Rare, medium, or well done. Human Factors, 87, 725–736.
62.
WilkinsonR. T. (1963). Interaction of noise with knowledge of results and sleep deprivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(4) 332–337.
63.
WohleberR. W.MatthewsG.LinJ.SzalmaJ. L.CalhounG. L.FunkeG. J.. . . RuffH. A. (2019). Vigilance and automation dependence in operation of multiple unmanned aerial systems (UAS): A simulation study. Human Factors. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0018720818799468
