Head Rotation Movement Times

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to measure head rotation movement times in a Fitts’ paradigm and to investigate the transition region from ballistic movements to visually controlled movements as the task index of difficulty (ID) increases.

Background:

For head rotation, there are gaps in the knowledge of the effects of movement amplitude and task difficulty around the critical transition region from ballistic movements to visually controlled movements.

Method:

Under the conditions of 11 ID values (from 1.0 to 6.0) and five movement amplitudes (20° to 60°), participants performed a head rotation task, and movement times were measured.

Results:

Both the movement amplitude and task difficulty have effects on movement times at low IDs, but movement times are dependent only on ID at higher ID values. Movement times of participants are higher than for arm/hand movements, for both ballistic and visually controlled movements. The information-processing rate of head rotational movements, at high ID values, is about half that of arm movements.

Conclusion:

As an input mode, head rotations are not as efficient as the arm system either in ability to use rapid ballistic movements or in the rate at which information may be processed.

Application:

The data of this study add to those in the review of Hoffmann for the critical IDs of different body motions. The data also allow design for the best arrangement of display that is under the design constraints of limited display area and difficulty of head-controlled movements in a data-inputting task.

Keywords

head rotation move times Fitts’ law critical index of difficulty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andres

R. O.

Hartung

K. J.

(1989). Prediction of head movement time using Fitts’ law. Human Factors, 31, 703–713.

Bate

P. J.

Hoffmann

E. R.

(1999). Kinematic analysis of effects of task constraints on prehension in ataxic brain-injured subjects. Human Movement Science, 18, 241–262.

Descarreaux

Passmore

S. R.

Cantin

(2010). Head movement kinematics during rapid aiming task performance in healthy and neck-pain participants: The importance of optimal task difficulty. Manual Therapy, 15, 445–450.

Fitts

P. M.

(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

Fitts

P. M.

Peterson

J. R.

(1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103–112.

Gan

K. C.

Hoffmann

E. R.

(1988). Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually-controlled movements. Ergonomics, 31, 829–839.

Hoffmann

E. R.

(1992). Fitts’ law with transmission delay. Ergonomics, 35, 37–48.

Hoffmann

E. R.

(2016). Critical index of difficulty for different body motions: A review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 48, 277–288.

Jagacinski

R. J.

Monk

D. L.

(1985). Fitts’ law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 77–95.

10.

Lin

M. L.

Radwin

R. G.

Vanderheiden

G. C.

(1992). Gain effects using a head-controlled computer input device. Ergonomics, 33(2), 159-175.

11.

Lin

R. F.

Tsai

Y.-C.

(2015). The use of ballistic movement as an additional method to assess performance of computer mice. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 45, 71–81.

12.

Marchand

A.-A.

Cantin

Murphy

Stern

Descarreaux

(2014). Is performance in goal orientated head movements altered in patients with tension type headache? Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15, 179–186.

13.

Passmore

S. R.

Burke

(2007). Older adults demonstrate reduced performance in a Fitts’ task involving cervical spine movement. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24, 352–363.

14.

Passmore

S. R.

Burke

J. R.

Good

Lyon

J. L.

Dunn

A. S.

(2009). Spinal manipulation impacts cervical spine movement and Fitts’ task performance: A single blind randomized before-after trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 33, 189–192.

15.

Pereira

C. A. M.

Neto

R. B.

Reynaldo

A. C.

Luzo

M. C. M.

Oliveira

R. P.

(2009). Development and evaluation of a head-controlled human-computer interface with mouse-like functions for physically disabled users. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 64, 975–981.

16.

Radwin

R. G.

Vanderheiden

G. C.

Lin

M.-L.

(1990). A method for evaluating head-controlled computer input devices using Fitts’ law. Human Factors, 32, 423–438.

17.

Schaab

J. A.

Radwin

R. G.

Vanderheiden

G. C.

Hansen

P. K.

(1996). A comparison of two control-display gain measures for head-controlled computer input devices. Human Factors, 38, 390–403.

18.

R. H. Y.

Chung

G. K. M.

(2002). Combined and interacting effects of hand and head movement delays on discrete manual performance in a virtual environment. Ergonomics, 45, 105–123.

19.

R. H. Y.

Chung

G. K. M.

Goonetilleke

R. S.

(1999). Target-directed head movements in a head-coupled virtual environment: Predicting the effects of delay using Fitts’ law. Human Factors, 41, 474–486.

20.

Soede

Stassen

H. G.

van Lunteren

Luitse

W. J.

(1973). A lightspot operated typewriter for severely physically handicapped patients. Ergonomics, 16, 829–844.

21.

van der Heijden

P. H.

Meyer

Sanders

A. H. T.

Sanders

H. A. J.

Melotte

H. E. M.

Bouma

1997. Writing apparatus controlled by head movements for motor handicapped people. Applied Ergonomics, 10, 39–45.