The present paper presents findings from two studies addressing the effects of the employee’s intention to have rest breaks on rest-break frequency and the change of well-being during a workday.
Background:
Rest breaks are effective in avoiding an accumulation of fatigue during work. However, little is known about individual differences in rest-break behavior.
Method:
In Study 1, the association between rest-break intention and the daily number of rest breaks recorded over 4 consecutive workdays was determined by generalized linear model in a sample of employees (n = 111, 59% females). In Study 2, professional geriatric nurses (n = 95 females) who worked over two consecutive 12-hour day shifts recorded well-being (fatigue, distress, effort motivation) at the beginning and the end of their shifts. The effect of rest-break intention on the change of well-being was determined by multilevel modeling.
Results:
Rest-break intention was positively associated with the frequency of rest breaks (Study 1) and reduced the increase of fatigue and distress over the workday (Study 2).
Conclusion:
The results indicate that individual differences account for the number of breaks an employee takes and, as a consequence, for variations in the work-related fatigue and distress.
Application:
Strengthening rest-break intentions may help to increase rest-break behavior to avoid the buildup of fatigue and distress over a workday.
AartsH.DijksterhuisA.MiddenC. (1999). To plan or not to plan? Goal achievement or interrupting the performance of mundane behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 971–979.
2.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ.BeckmannJ. (Eds.), Action control: From cognitions to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.
3.
ArlinghausA.LombardiD. A.CourtneyT. K.ChristianiD. C.FolkardS.PerryM. J. (2012). The effect of rest breaks on time to injury—A study on work-related ladder-fall injuries in the United States. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 38, 560–567.
4.
BevanW.AvantL. L.LankfordH. G. (1967). Influence of interpolated periods of activity and inactivity upon the vigilance decrement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 352–356.
5.
BhatiaN.MurrellK. F. H. (1969). An industrial experiment in organized rest pauses. Human Factors, 11, 167–173.
6.
BlascheG.MarktlW. (2011). Recovery intention: Its association with fatigue in the working population. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84, 859–865.
7.
BoucseinW.ThumM. (1997). Design of work/rest schedules for computer work based on psychophysiological recovery measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 51–57.
8.
CervinkaR.SchwabM.SchönbauerR.HämmerleI.PirgieL.SudkampJ. (2016). My garden—My mate? Perceived restorativeness of private gardens and its predictors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16, 182–187.
9.
DababnehA. J.SwansonN.ShellR. L. (2001). Impact of added rest breaks on the productivity and well being of workers. Ergonomics, 44, 164–174.
10.
de RooijA. H. P. M.LuijkxK. G.DeclercqA. G.EmmerinkP. M. J.ScholsJ. M. G. A. (2012). Professional caregivers’ mental health problems and burnout in small-scale and traditional long term care settings for elderly people with dementia in The Netherlands and Belgium. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13, 486.e7–486.e11.
11.
DroryA. (1985). Effects of rest and secondary task on simulated truck-driving task performance. Human Factors, 27, 201–207.
FritzC.LamC.SpreitzerG. (2011). It’s the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers’ energy management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 28–39.
14.
GodinG.KokG. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 87–98.
15.
GollwitzerP. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
16.
GollwitzerP. M.SheeranP. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.
17.
GrafO. (1923). Über lohnendste Arbeitspausen bei geistiger Arbeit [About rewarding rest breaks in mental work]. Psychologische Forschung, 3, 428–429.
18.
GrafO.RutenfranzU.UlichE. (1970). Arbeitszeit und Arbeitspausen. In MayerA.GottschaldtK. (Eds.), Handbuch der psychologie, betriebspsychologie [Work time and rest breaks] (Vol. 9, pp. 244–277). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
19.
HahnE. (1989). Erholungswirkungen ausgewählter Pausenorganisationsvarianten bei Routinebildschirmarbeitstätigkeiten [Recovery effects of selected rest break schedules in VDT work]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 33, 188–196.
20.
HamedM. M.JaradatA. S.EasaS. M. (1998). Analysis of commercial mini-bus accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 555–567.
21.
HenningR. A.SauterS. L.SalvendyG.KriegE. F.Jr. (1989). Microbreak length, performance, and stress in a data entry task. Ergonomics, 32, 855–864.
22.
HockeyG. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73–93.
23.
LeubaJ. H. (1901). Ueber Arbeit und Ruhe [About work and rest]. Psychological Review, 8, 635–638.
24.
MaesS.KarolyP. (2005). Self-regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: A review. Applied Psychology, 54, 267–299.
25.
McCormackP. D. (1958). Performance in a vigilance task as a function of inter-stimulus interval and interpolated rest. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 12, 242–246.
26.
MeijmanT. F. (1997). Mental fatigue and the efficiency of information processing in relation to work times. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 31–38.
MurrellK. F. H. (1961). Operator variability and its industrial consequences. International Journal of Production Research, 1, 39–55.
29.
NitschJ. (1976). Die Eigenzustandsskala (EZ-Skalal)—Ein Verfahren zur hierarchisch-mehrdimensionalen Befindlichkeitsskalierung [Personal state scale—A hierarchical-multidimensional procedure to assess well-being]. In NitschJ. R.UdrisI. (Eds.), Beanspruchung im Sport (pp. 81–102). Bad Hombug v.d.H., Germany: Limpert.
30.
PokornyM. L.BlomD. H.van LeeuwenP.van NootenW. N. (1987). Shift sequences, duration of rest periods, and accident risk of bus drivers. Human Factors, 29, 73–81.
31.
RichterA. (2013). Bestimmung der Validität des “Fragebogens zur Erfassung erholungsrelevanter Eigenschaften” [Determining the validity of the Questionnaire Assessing Recovery Related Traits]. Unpublished PhD disertation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
32.
SarnaL.BialousS. A.WellsM. J.KotlermanJ.FroelicherE. S.WewersM. E. (2009). Do you need to smoke to get a break? Smoking status and missed work breaks among staff nurses. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37, S165–S171.
33.
SarnaL.BialousS. A.WewersM. E.FroelicherE. S.DanaoL. (2005). Nurses, smoking, and the workplace. Research in Nursing and Health, 28, 79–90.
34.
SheeranP. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1–30.
35.
SiegristJ.WegeN.PuhlhoferF.WahrendorfM. (2009). A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: Effort-reward imbalance. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 82, 1005–1013.
36.
SonnentagS.MojzaE. J.BinnewiesC.SchollA. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement, psychological detachment, and affect. Work and Stress, 22, 257–276.
37.
StaveA. M. (1977). The effects of cockpit environment on long-term pilot performance. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 19, 503–514.
38.
TuckerP. (2003). The impact of rest breaks upon accident risk, fatigue and performance: A review. Work and Stress, 17, 123–137.
39.
TuckerP.FolkardS.MacdonaldI. (2003). Rest breaks and accident risk. Lancet, 361, 680.
40.
TuckerP.LombardiD.SmithL.FolkardS. (2006). The impact of rest breaks on temporal trends in injury risk. Chronobiology International, 23, 1423–1434.
41.
van HooffM. L. M.GeurtsS. A. E.BeckersD. G. J.KompierM. A. J. (2011). Daily recovery from work: The role of activities, effort and pleasure. Work Stress, 25, 55–74.
42.
van VeldhovenM. J.SluiterJ. K. (2009). Work-related recovery opportunities: Testing scale properties and validity in relation to health. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 82, 1065–1075.
43.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268.
44.
ZacherH.BrailsfordH. A.ParkerS. L. (2014). Micro-breaks matter: A diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85, 287–297.
