Hangar Talk Survey

Abstract

Objective:

The current study developed an online hangar talk survey (HTS) to solicit narratives describing challenging scenarios that professional pilots encountered during the hours-building phase of their career.

Background:

The predicted pilot shortage will effectively reduce the minimum flying hours required for pilots to be hired at an airline, resulting in less opportunity to develop nontechnical skills naturalistically. To compensate, threat and error data from the hours-building phase of a pilot’s career are required to inform training development. Pilots often share stories of such experiences, colloquially termed “hangar talk.”

Method:

The HTS gathered 132 narrative descriptions of general aviation (GA) events from pilots along with the event’s impact and whether the pilots would react differently if the scenario were encountered again.

Results:

The distribution of threats reported by GA pilots was similar to that reported at the airline level. Logistic regression analysis revealed that decision-making errors were associated with recognition of the need to react differently in the future, and decision-making errors and proficiency errors were associated with greater perceived impact on skill development.

Conclusion:

The current HTS solicited an array of data similar to the findings of airline-based threat and error observations. Pilots perceive decision-making and proficiency errors as impactful on skill development.

Application:

An HTS can be used to gather naturalistic threat and error data and to create a database of operational stories that can be used to develop nontechnical training based on narrative thought.

Keywords

hours-building phase narrative thought nontechnical skills pilot training

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aviation Safety Reporting System. (n.d.). ASRS concept and mission. Retrieved from http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/overview/briefing/br_1.html

Bruner

(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Helmreich

R. L.

(2000). Culture and error in space: Implications from analog environments. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 71, 133–139.

Helmreich

R. L.

Klinect

J. R.

Wilhelm

J. A.

(2001). System safety and threat and error management: The line operations safety audit (LOSA). In Jensen

R. S.

(Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1–6). Columbus: Ohio State University.

Helmreich

R. L.

Merritt

A. C.

Wilhelm

J. A.

(1999). The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 19–32.

Helmreich

R. L.

Wilhelm

J. A.

Klinect

J. R.

Merritt

A. C.

(in press). Culture, error and crew resource management. In Salas

Bowers

C. A.

Edens

(Eds.), Applying resource management in organizations: A guide for professionals. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hull

(1993). Opening minds, opening doors: The rebirth of American education. Waco, TX: Center for Occupational Research and Development.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2002). Line operations safety audit (LOSA). Montreal, Canada: Author.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2011). Global and regional 20-year forecasts: Pilots. Maintenance personnel. Air traffic controllers. Montreal, Canada: Author.

10.

Kearns

(2009). Canadian aviation. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.

11.

Kearns

Sutton

J. E.

(in press). Exploring the experiences of pilots within Canadian general aviation flight operations. Collegiate Aviation Review.

12.

Klinect

J. R.

(2005). Line operations safety audit: A cockpit observation methodology for monitoring commercial airline safety performance (Unpublished doctoral disertation). University of Texas, Austin. Retrieved from https://www.lib.utexas.edu/etd/d/2005/klinectj57340/klinectj57340.pdf

13.

Klinect

Murray

Merritt

Helmreich

(2003). Line operations safety audit (LOSA): Definition and operating characteristics. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 663–668). Dayton: Ohio State University.

14.

Klinect

J. R.

Wilhelm

J. A.

Helmreich

R. L.

(1999). Threat and error management: Data from line operations safety audits. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 683–688). Columbus: Ohio State University.

15.

W.-C.

Harris

(2006). Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 77, 1056–1061.

16.

Maurino

D. E.

Reason

J. T.

Johnston

Lee

R. B.

(1995). Beyond aviation human factors. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

17.

O’Hare

(2003). Aeronautical decision making: Metaphors, models, and methods. In Tsang

P. S.

Vidulich

M. A.

(Eds.), Principles and practice of aviation psychology: Human factors in transportation (pp. 201–237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

Sarbin

T. R.

(1986). The narrative as root metaphor for psychology. In Lanfield

A. W.

(Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Praeger.

19.

Shappell

Detwiler

Holcomb

Hackworth

Boquet

Wiegmann

D. A.

(2007). Human error and commercial aviation accidents: An analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. Human Factors, 49, 227–242.

20.

Thomas

M. J.

(2004). Predictors of threat and error management: Identification of core nontechnical skills and implications for training systems design. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 207–231.

21.

Trollip

S. R.

Jensen

R. S.

(1991). Human factors for general aviation. Englewood, CO: Jeppesen Sanderson.

22.

Vitz

P. C.

(1990). The use of stories in moral development: New psychological reasons for an old education method. American Psychologist, 45, 709–720.