Recurrence-based measures of communication determinism and pattern information are described and validated using previously collected team interaction data.
Background:
Team coordination dynamics has revealed that “mixing” team membership can lead to flexible interaction processes, but keeping a team “intact” can lead to rigid interaction processes. We hypothesized that communication of intact teams would have greater determinism and higher pattern information compared to that of mixed teams.
Method:
Determinism and pattern information were measured from three-person Uninhabited Air Vehicle team communication sequences over a series of 40-minute missions. Because team members communicated using push-to-talk buttons, communication sequences were automatically generated during each mission.
Results:
The Composition × Mission determinism effect was significant. Intact teams’ determinism increased over missions, whereas mixed teams’ determinism did not change. Intact teams had significantly higher maximum pattern information than mixed teams.
Conclusion:
Results from these new communication analysis methods converge with content-based methods and support our hypotheses.
Application:
Because they are not content based, and because they are automatic and fast, these new methods may be amenable to real-time communication pattern analysis.
AchilleL. B.SchultzK. G.Schmidt-NielsonA. (1995). An analysis of communication and the use of military terms in Navy team training. Military Psychology, 7, 95–107.
2.
BakemanR.GottmanJ. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BandtC. (2005). Ordinal time series analysis. Ecological Modeling, 182, 229–238.
4.
BowersC. A.JentschF.SalasE.BraunC. C. (1998). Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40, 672–679.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CookeN. J.GormanJ. C. (2010). The pragmatics of communication-based methods for measuring macrocognition. In PattersonE. S.MillerJ. E. (Eds.), Macrocognition metrics and scenarios (pp. 161–178). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
7.
CookeN. J.ShopeS. M. (2005). Synthetic task environments for teams: CERTT’s UAV-STE. In Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods (pp. 46-1–46-6). Boca Raton, FL: CLC Press.
8.
CoverT. M.ThomasJ. A. (2006). Elements of information theory (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
9.
DaleR.SpiveyM. J. (2006). Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns of syntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56, 391–430.
10.
DaleR.WarlaumontA. S.RichardsonD. C. (in press). Nominal cross recurrence as a generalized lag sequential analysis for behavioral streams. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos.
EmmertP.BarkerL. L. (1989). Measurement of communication behavior. White Plains, NY: Longman.
13.
FischerU.McDonnellL.OrasanuJ. (2007). Linguistic correlates of team performance: Toward a tool for monitoring team functioning during space missions. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78, B86–B95.
14.
FoltzP. W.MartinM. J. (2009). Automated communication analysis of teams. In SalasE.GoodwinJ.BurkeC. S. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 411–431; SIOP Organizational Frontiers Series). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
GallagerR. G. (1968). Information theory and reliable communication. New York, NY: John Wiley.
16.
GersickC.J.G.HackmanJ. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65–97.
17.
GoldbergerA. L.AmaralL.A.N.HausdorffJ. M.IvanovP. Ch.PengC.–K.StanleyH. E. (2002). Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 2466–2472.
18.
GormanJ. C.AmazeenP. G.CookeN. J. (2010). Team coordination dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 14, 265–289.
19.
GormanJ. C.CookeN. J. (2011). Changes in team cognition after a retention interval: The benefits of mixing it up. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a002514910.1037/a0025149.
20.
GormanJ. C.CookeN. J.AmazeenP. G. (2010). Training adaptive teams. Human Factors, 52, 295–307.
21.
GormanJ. C.CookeN. J.PedersenH. K.WinnerJ. L.AndrewsD.AmazeenP. G. (2006). Changes in team composition after a break: Building adaptive command-and-control teams. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th annual meeting (pp. 487–492). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
22.
GormanJ. C.FoltzP. W.KiekelP. A.MartinM. J.CookeN. J. (2003). Evaluation of latent semantic analysis-based measures of team communication content. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (pp. 424–428). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
23.
HubermanB. A.GlanceN. S. (1998). Fluctuating efforts and sustainable cooperation. In PrietulaM. J.CarleyK. M.GasserL. (Eds.), Simulating organizations (pp. 89–103). Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
24.
JanisI. L. (1972). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
25.
KankiB. G.LozitoS.FousheeC. H. (1989). Communication indices of crew coordination. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 56–60.
26.
KatzR. L. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81–104.
27.
MarwanN.KurthsJ. (2002). Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots. Physics Letters A, 302, 299–307.
28.
MarwanN.RomanoM. C.ThielM.KurthsJ. (2007). Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Physics Reports, 5–6, 237–329.
29.
MillerA.ScheinkestelC.JosephM. (2009). Coordination and continuity of intensive care unit patient care. Human Factors, 51, 354–367.
30.
PincusD.FoxK. M.PerezK. A.TurnerJ. S.McGeehanA. R. (2008). Nonlinear dynamics of individual and interpersonal conflict in an experimental group. Small Group Research, 39, 150–178.
31.
QueraV. (2008). RAP: A computer program for exploring similarities in behavior sequences using random projections. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 21–32.
32.
RichardsonD. C.DaleR. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29, 1045–1060.
33.
SextonJ. B.HelmreichR. L. (2000). Analyzing cockpit communication: The links between language, performance, error, and workload. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5, 63–68.
34.
ShannonC. E.WeaverW. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35.
ShockleyK.ButwillM.ZbilutJ. P.WebberC. L.Jr. (2002). Cross recurrence quantification of coupled oscillators. Physics Letters A, 305, 59–69.
36.
ShockleyK.SantanaM. V.FowlerC. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 326–332.
37.
TheilerJ.EubankS.LongtinA.GaldrikianB.FarmerJ. D. (1992). Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data. Physica D, 15, 77–94.
38.
Van OrdenG. C.HoldenJ. G.TurveyM. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 331–350.
39.
Van OrdenG. C.KloosH.WallotS. (2009). Living in the pink: Intentionality, wellbeing, and complexity. In HookerC. (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science Volume 10: Philosophy of complex systems (pp. 639–683). New York, NY: Elsevier.
40.
WebberC. L.Jr.ZbilutJ. P. (1994). Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. Journal of Applied Physiology, 76, 965–973.
41.
XiaoY.SeagullF. J.MackenzieC. F.KleinK. J.ZiegertJ. (2008). Adaptation of team communication patterns: Exploring the effects of leadership at a distance, task urgency, and shared team experience. In WeisbandS. P. (Ed.), Leadership at a distance: Research in technology-supported work (pp. 71–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
