Objective: The current study is intended to evaluate the stability of a scissor lift and the performance of various fall-arrest harnesses/lanyards during drop/fall-arrest conditions and to quantify the dynamic loading to the head/neck caused by fall-arrest forces.
Background: No data exist that establish the efficacy of fall-arrest systems for use on scissor lifts or the injury potential from the fall incidents using a fall-arrest system.
Method: The authors developed a multibody dynamic model of the scissor lift and a human lift operator model using ADAMS™ and LifeMOD™ Bio-mechanics Human Modeler. They evaluated lift stability for four fall-arrest system products and quantified biomechanical impacts on operators during drop/fall arrest, using manikin drop tests. Test conditions were constrained to flat surfaces to isolate the effect of manikin-lanyard interaction.
Results: The fully extended scissor lift maintained structural and dynamic stability for all manikin drop test conditions. The maximum arrest forces from the harnesses/lanyards were all within the limits of ANSI Z359.1. The dynamic loading in the lower neck during the fall impact reached a level that is typically observed in automobile crash tests, indicating a potential injury risk for vulnerable participants.
Conclusion: Fall-arrest systems may function as an effective mechanism for fall injury protection for operators of scissor lifts. However, operators may be subjected to significant biomechanical loadings on the lower neck during fall impact.
Application: Results suggest that scissor lifts retain stability under test conditions approximating human falls from predefined distances but injury could occur to vulnerable body structures.
American National Standards Institute. (2006). Self-propelled elevating aerial work platforms (ANSI/ASSE A92.6). New York, NY: Author.
2.
American National Standards Institute. (2007). Safety requirements for personal fall arrest safety systems, subsystems and components (ANSI/ASSE Z359.1). New York, NY: Author.
3.
Ashton-MillerJ. A.SchultzA. B. (1988). Biomechanics of the human spine and trunk. Exercise and Sports Sciences Review, 16, 169–204.
4.
BostromO.HalandY.SvenssonM. (2000). Neck injury criterion (nic) and its relevance to various possible injury mechanisms. In YoganandanN.PintarF. (Eds.), Frontiers in whiplash trauma: Clinical and biomechanical (pp. 456–467). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
5.
BurkartM. J.McCannM.PaineD. M. (2004). Aerial work platforms. In Elevated work platforms and scaffolding (pp. 239–300). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
6.
DeakinR. S. (1993). Military aircrew head support system. Journal of Aircraft, 30, 100–104.
7.
DelahayeR. P. (1982). Physiopathology and pathology of affections of the spine in aerospace medicine (AGARD-AG-250(Eng)). Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development.
8.
DengY. C.GoldsmithW. (1987). Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading—physical model. Journal of Biomechanics, 20, 471–486.
EllisJ. N. (2001). Aerial lifts and platforms. In Introduction to fall protection (pp. 115–118). Des Plaines, IL: American Society of Safety Engineers.
11.
EppingerR.SunE.KuppaS.SaulR. (2000). Supplement: Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems, II. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
12.
GreenJ. D.YannacconeJ. R.CurrentR. S.SicherL. A.MooreP. H.WhitmanG. R. (2010). Assessing the performance of various restraints on ambulance patient compartment workers during crash events. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 15, 517–541.
13.
HarrisJ. R.PowersJ. R.PanC. S.BoehlerB. (2010). Fall arrest characteristics of a scissor lift. Journal of Safety Research, 41, 213–220.
14.
HartsellJ. (2010). The development of a dynamic scissor lift model (Unpublished master’s thesis). West Virginia University, Morgantown.
15.
HeathF. G. (2006, May–June). Accident waiting to happen. Lift and Access, pp. 46–50.
16.
HenzelJ. H. (1967). The human spinal column and upward ejection acceleration: Appraisal of biodynamic implications (Rep. No. AMRL-TR-66-233). Pensacola, FL: U.S. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
17.
HsiaoH.BradtmillerB.WhitestoneJ. (2003). Sizing and fit of fall-protection harnesses. Ergonomics, 46, 1233–1258.
18.
International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Mobile elevating work platforms—design calculations, safety requirements and test methods (ISO 16368, 2003(E)). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
19.
LuoZ. P.GoldsmithW. (1991). Reaction of a human head/neck/torso system to shock. Journal of Biomechanics, 24, 499–510.
20.
McCannM. (2003). Death in construction related to personnel lifts, 1992–1999. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 507–514.
21.
National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. (2008). Title 49, CFR Pt. 571.208, occupant crash protection. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
NightingaleR. W.McElhaneyJ. H.RichardsonW. J.BestT. M.MyersB. S. (1996). Experimental impact injury to the cervical spine: Relating motion of the head and the mechanism of injury. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 78, 412–421.
23.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2010). Top 10 most frequently cited standards for fiscal 2010 (Oct. 1, 2009 to Sept. 30, 2010). Retrieved from http://63.234.227.130/Top_Ten_Standards.html
24.
PanC. S.HoskinA.LinM.McCannM.FernK.KeaneP. (2007). Aerial lift fall injuries: A surveillance and evaluation approach for targeting prevention activities. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 617–625.
25.
PanjabiM. M.ItoS.IvancicP. C.RubinW. (2005). Evaluation of the intervertebral neck injury criterion using simulated rear impacts. Journal of Biomechanics, 38, 1694–1701.
26.
PanjabiM.WangJ.DelsonN. (1999). Neck injury criterion based on intervertebral motions and its evaluation using an instrumented neck dummy. In Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference (pp. 179–190). Zurich, Switzerland: International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury.
27.
RamseyG.ParrishK.WhiteheadE. (2009, March). Sharp scissors: Analyzing the 19-foot-tall elevator class. Lift and Access, pp. 24–36.
28.
RichesD. (2002). Analysis and evaluation of different types of test surrogate employed in the dynamic performance testing of fall-arrest equipment. Health and Safety Executive, 411. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2002/crr02411.pdf
29.
RonaghiM.WuJ. Z.PanC. S.HarrisJ.WelcomeD.ChiouS.DongR. G. (2009). Scissor lift safety—An initiative to model static stability. Professional Safety, 54(4), 43–48.
30.
StemperB. D.YoganandanN.PintarF. A.ShenderB. S.PaskoffG. R. (2009). Physical effects of ejection on the head-neck complex: Demonstration of a cadaver model. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 80, 489–494.
31.
TeyssandierM. J.DelahayeR. P. (1967). Les Fractures Du Rachis Chez Le Parachutiste [Fractures of the spine in the parachutist]. Aeronautical and Space Medicine, 6(24), 19–23.
VianoD. C.ParenteauC. S. (2008). Analysis of head impacts causing neck compression injury. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9, 144–152.
34.
WhiteA. A.PanjabiM. M. (1978). Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
35.
WuJ. Z.PowersJ. R.HarrisJ. R.PanC. S. (in press). Estimation of the kinetic energy dissipation in fall arrest system and human body during fall impact. Ergonomics.
36.
YangK.BegemanP.MuserM.NiedererP.WalzF. (1997). On the role of cervical facet joints in rear end impact neck injury mechanisms (970497). Troy, MI: Society of Automotive Engineers.
37.
YoganandanN.PintarF. A.StemperB. D.SchlickM. B.PhilippensM.WismansJ. (2000). Biomechanics of human occupants in simulated rear crashes: Documentation of neck injuries and comparison of injury criteria. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 44, 189–204.
