A study was undertaken of over a hundred professionals working with drug users in one English county, drawn from health, community care, social services, the criminal justice system and a number of voluntary organisations. The study set out to discover perceptions of professional roles and in particular of the differing aims of drug education. Three distinct and conflicting models of education were described: education for prevention, education for harm minimisation and education for individual empowerment. Conflict of roles and responsibilities was evident and the favoured solution was clarification of aims.
Dingwall R., Lewis P.The Sociology of the Professions: Lawyers Doctors and Others. London: Macmillan, 1989.
2.
Macdonald KMThe Sociology of the Professions. London: Sage, 1995.
3.
Dorn N., Murji K.Drug prevention: a review of the English language literature. ISDD Research Monograph 5. London: Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence, 1992.
4.
Davies JB, Coggans N.The Facts about Adolescent Drug Use. London: Cassel, 1991.
5.
Fullerton D., Holland J., Oakley A.Towards effective intervention: eyaluating HIV prevention and sexual health education interventions. In: Aggleton P, Davies P, Hart G (eds), AIDS: Safety, Sexuality and Risk. London : Taylor and Francis, 1995, 90-108.
6.
Davidsonrada J., Caldis S., Tonkin SLNew Zealand SIDS prevention programme and reduction in infant mortality. Health Education Quarterly1995: 22(2): 161-71.
7.
Feingold RSMaking connections: an agenda for the future. Quest1995: 46(3): 357-67.
8.
Negreiros J.Theoretical orientations in drug abuse prevention research. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy1995: 1(2): 135-42.
9.
Secker J., Wimbush E, Watson J, Milburn K. Qualitative methods in health promotion research: some criteria for quality. Health Education Journal1995: 54(1): 74-87.
