A county extension-delivered,email-mediated walking intervention: A programme evaluation

Abstract

Objective:

The promotion of walking could be a feasible population-level physical activity strategy because it requires little planning, is low cost and can be done year-round across settings. Community, nonprofit organisations offer one means by which to help increase walking through community programmes. The US Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service has a history that spans more than a century and is known for quality in the delivery of educational programmes to help improve the lives of people in communities across the USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of the Get WalkIN’ intervention – an initiative supported by this programme – from the perspectives of both programme participants and county extension educators.

Methods:

Participants were recruited from 15 county extension sites in the Midwest region of the USA. Intervention emails targeted self-efficacy, social support, goal-setting and benefits/barriers to walking. To assess the perceptions of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, participants and extension educators were asked to respond to a series of Likert-type scale and open-ended questions. Self-reported physical activity was assessed using the Godin Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Results:

On average, participants and extension educators agreed that the programme was easy to use and would consider either recommending the programme to a friend or implementing the programme again within the community. Post-intervention, 69.1% of respondents were classified as sufficiently active compared to 60.5% pre-intervention.

Conclusion:

The use of the county-based US Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service is an effective option for health promotion programming. Furthermore, a theory-based, email-mediated intervention is a valuable strategy as an independent and convenient way to facilitate increase in physical activity.

Keywords

Cooperative Extension intervention physical activity social cognitive theory USA walking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

(1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Self Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012a) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, GA. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_tools.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012b) Defining overweight and obesity. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015) BMI calculation and interpretation. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/index.html#Interpreted

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) BRFSS prevalence and trends data. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence

Department of Health and Human Services (2008) Physical activities guidelines advisory committee report. Available at: http://health.gov/paguidelines/report/pdf/committeereport.pdf

Godin

Shephard

(1985) A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 10: 141–146.

Maddux

(1995) Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum Press.

Marcus

Ciccolo

Sciamanna

(2009) Using electronic/computer interventions to promote physical activity. British Journal of Sports Medicine 43: 102–105.

10.

Marcus

Nigg

Riebe

et al . (2000) Interactive communication strategies: Implications for population-based physical-activity promotion. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 19: 121–126.

11.

Marcus

Williams

Dubbert

et al . (2006) Physical activity intervention studies: What we know and what we need to know – A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation 114: 2739–2752.

12.

Napolitano

Marcus

(2002) Targeting and tailoring physical activity information using print and information technologies. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 30: 122–128.

13.

Plotnikoff

Pickering

McCargar

et al . (2010) Six-month follow-up and participant use and satisfaction of an electronic mail intervention promoting physical activity and nutrition. American Journal of Health Promotion 24: 255–259.

14.

Rhodes

Pfaeffli

(2010) Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: A review update. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 7: 1–11.

15.

Richards

Ogata

Cheng

(2016) Randomized, controlled e-mail based walking intervention: Differences between dog owners and non-dog owners. Clinical Nursing Research 65(3): 191–201. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000155.

16.

Richards

Ogata

Ting

(2015) Dogs, Physical Activity, and Walking (Dogs PAW): Acceptability and feasibility of a pilot physical activity intervention. Health Promotion Practice 16(2): 362–370.

17.

Sallis

Grossman

Pinski

et al . (1987) The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Preventive Medicine 16: 825–836.

18.

Sallis

Pinski

Grossman

et al . (1988) Development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise. Health Education Research 3: 283–292.

19.

Strath

Kaminsky

Ainsworth

et al . (2013) Guide to the assessment of physical activity: Clinical and research applications – A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 128: 2259–2279.

20.

United States Department of Agriculture (2016) Rural-urban continuum codes. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes/documentation.aspx

21.

United States Department of Agriculture (2018) Cooperative extension history. Available at: https://nifa.usda.gov/cooperative-extension-history

22.

US Census Bureau (2016) Indiana quick facts. Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/IN/PST045216

23.

US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/

24.

US Department of Health and Human Services (2015) Step It up! The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Promote Walking and Walkable Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General.

25.

Van den Berg

Schoones

Vliet Vlieland

(2007) Internet-based physical activity interventions: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 9: e26.

26.

World Health Organization. (2017). Physical activity. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/topics/physical_activity/en/